From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Parav Pandit <parav@nvidia.com>
Cc: Heng Qi <hengqi@linux.alibaba.com>,
"virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org"
<virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org>,
"virtio-comment@lists.oasis-open.org"
<virtio-comment@lists.oasis-open.org>,
Alvaro Karsz <alvaro.karsz@solid-run.com>,
David Edmondson <david.edmondson@oracle.com>,
Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Subject: [virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH v10] virtio-net: support the virtqueue coalescing moderation
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2023 18:34:33 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230302183149-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <PH0PR12MB548192A8443A7F30A70CFE80DCB29@PH0PR12MB5481.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
On Thu, Mar 02, 2023 at 02:48:44PM +0000, Parav Pandit wrote:
>
>
> > From: Heng Qi <hengqi@linux.alibaba.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 1, 2023 9:10 AM
>
> > Currently, coalescing parameters are grouped for all transmit and receive
> > virtqueues. This patch supports setting or getting the parameters for a specified
> > virtqueue, and a typical application of this function is netdim[1].
> >
> > When the traffic between virtqueues is unbalanced, for example, one
> > virtqueue is busy and another virtqueue is idle, then it will be very useful to
> > control coalescing parameters at the virtqueue granularity.
> >
>
> [..]
> > +Read/Write attributes for coalescing parameters:
> > +\begin{itemize}
> > +\item For commands VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_NOTF_COAL_TX_SET and
> > VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_NOTF_COAL_RX_SET, \field{max_usecs}
> > + and \field{max_packets} are write-only for a driver.
> > +\item For the command VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_NOTF_COAL_VQ_SET, \field{vqn},
> > \field{reserved}, \field{max_usecs}
> > + and \field{max_packets} are write-only for a driver.
> > +\item For the command VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_NOTF_COAL_VQ_GET, \field{vqn}
> > and \field{reserved} are write-only
> > + for a driver, and, \field{max_usecs} and \field{max_packets} are read-only
> > for the driver.
> > +\end{itemize}
> > +
> Maybe I missed the conversation while I was sick.
> I remember we discussed that instead of mentioning each individual field, better to describe the whole structure being read-only or write-only.
we can't, for GET part is RO part is WO.
> > +The class VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_NOTF_COAL has 4 commands:
> > \begin{enumerate}
> > -\item VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_NOTF_COAL_TX_SET: set the \field{max_usecs} and
> > \field{max_packets} parameters for all transmit virtqueues.
> > -\item VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_NOTF_COAL_RX_SET: set the \field{max_usecs} and
> > \field{max_packets} parameters for all receive virtqueues.
> > +\item VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_NOTF_COAL_TX_SET: use the structure
> > virtio_net_ctrl_coal to set the \field{max_usecs} and \field{max_packets}
> > parameters for all transmit virtqueues.
> > +\item VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_NOTF_COAL_RX_SET: use the structure
> > virtio_net_ctrl_coal to set the \field{max_usecs} and \field{max_packets}
> > parameters for all receive virtqueues.
> > +\item VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_NOTF_COAL_VQ_SET: use the structure
> > virtio_net_ctrl_coal_vq to set the \field{max_usecs} and \field{max_packets}
> > parameters
> > + for an enabled transmit/receive virtqueue whose
> > number is \field{vqn}.
> > +\item VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_NOTF_COAL_VQ_GET: use the structure
> > virtio_net_ctrl_coal_vq to get the \field{max_usecs} and \field{max_packets}
> > parameters
> > + for an enabled transmit/receive virtqueue whose
> > number is \field{vqn}.
> > \end{enumerate}
> >
> > +\begin{note}
> > +The behavior of the device in response to these commands is best-effort:
> > +the device may generate notifications more or less frequently than specified.
> > +\end{note}
> > +
> Michael,
> Why this should be a note? Shouldn't it be a normative line in the device requirements?
the second part with
"may" should be upper case and used in a normative section, true.
We can also have a note with the best-effort part, just avoid "may".
> > +If coalescing parameters are being set, the device applies the last
> > +coalescing parameters received for a virtqueue, regardless of the
> s/received/set to match the if condition wording and regardless sentence after.
>
> > +command used to set the parameters. Use the following command sequence
> > with 2 pairs of virtqueues as an example:
> > +Each of the following commands sets \field{max_usecs} and
> > \field{max_packets} parameters for virtqueues.
> > +\begin{itemize}
> > +\item Command1: VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_NOTF_COAL_RX_SET sets coalescing
> > parameters for virtqueue0 and virtqueue2, and, virtqueue1 and virtqueue3
> > retain their previous parameter values.
> > +\item Command2: VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_NOTF_COAL_VQ_SET with \field{vqn} =
> > 0 sets coalescing parameters for virtqueue0, and virtqueue2 retains the values
> > from command1.
> > +\item Command3: VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_NOTF_COAL_VQ_GET with \field{vqn} =
> > 0, the device responds with coalescing parameters of virtqueue0 set by
> > command2.
> > +\item Command4: VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_NOTF_COAL_VQ_SET with \field{vqn} =
> > 1 sets coalescing parameters for virtqueue1, and virtqueue3 retains its previous
> > values.
> > +\item Command5: VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_NOTF_COAL_TX_SET sets coalescing
> > parameters for virtqueue1 and virtqueue3, and overrides the values set by
> > command4.
> > +\item Command6: VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_NOTF_COAL_VQ_GET with \field{vqn} =
> > 1, the device responds with coalescing parameters of virtqueue1 set by
> > command5.
> > +\end{itemize}
> > +
> > +Upon disabling and re-enabling the transmit virtqueue, the device will
> > +set the coalescing parameters of the virtqueue to those configured through
> > the VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_NOTF_COAL_TX_SET command, or to 0 if the command
> > did not set any TX coalescing parameters.
> > +
> > +Upon disabling and re-enabling the receive virtqueue, the device will
> > +set the coalescing parameters of the virtqueue to those configured through
> > the VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_NOTF_COAL_RX_SET command, or to 0 if the command
> > did not set any RX coalescing parameters.
> > +
> Looks good, however you have well covered in the device normative statements.
> So possibly it can be removed from here.
I think it's ok - more readable.
> > \subparagraph{Operation}\label{sec:Device Types / Network Device / Device
> > Operation / Control Virtqueue / Notifications Coalescing / Operation}
> >
> > The device sends a used buffer notification once the notification conditions are
> > met and if the notifications are not suppressed as explained in \ref{sec:Basic
> > Facilities of a Virtio Device / Virtqueues / Used Buffer Notification Suppression}.
> > @@ -1585,11 +1637,25 @@ \subsubsection{Control
> > Virtqueue}\label{sec:Device Types / Network Device / Devi
> >
> > \drivernormative{\subparagraph}{Notifications Coalescing}{Device Types /
> > Network Device / Device Operation / Control Virtqueue / Notifications
> > Coalescing}
> >
> > -If the VIRTIO_NET_F_NOTF_COAL feature has not been negotiated, the driver
> > MUST NOT issue VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_NOTF_COAL commands.
> > +A driver MUST negotiate the VIRTIO_NET_F_NOTF_COAL feature before
> > issuing commands VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_NOTF_COAL_TX_SET and
> > VIRIO_NET_CTRL_NOTF_COAL_RX_SET.
> > +
> > +A driver MUST negotiate the VIRTIO_NET_F_VQ_NOTF_COAL feature before
> > issuing commands VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_NOTF_COAL_VQ_SET and
> > VIRIO_NET_CTRL_NOTF_COAL_VQ_GET.
> > +
> > +A driver MUST ignore the values of coalescing parameters received from the
> > VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_NOTF_COAL_VQ_GET command if a device responds with
> > VIRTIO_NET_ERR.
> >
> > \devicenormative{\subparagraph}{Notifications Coalescing}{Device Types /
> > Network Device / Device Operation / Control Virtqueue / Notifications
> > Coalescing}
> >
> > -A device SHOULD respond to the VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_NOTF_COAL commands
> > with VIRTIO_NET_ERR if it was not able to change the parameters.
> > +A device MUST ignore \field{reserved}.
> > +
> > +A device SHOULD respond to VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_NOTF_COAL_TX_SET and
> > VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_NOTF_COAL_RX_SET commands with VIRTIO_NET_ERR if it
> > was not able to change the parameters.
> > +
> > +A device MUST respond to the VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_NOTF_COAL_VQ_SET
> > command with VIRTIO_NET_ERR if it was not able to change the parameters.
> > +
> > +A device MUST respond to VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_NOTF_COAL_VQ_SET and
> > VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_NOTF_COAL_VQ_GET commands with VIRTIO_NET_ERR if
> > the given virtqueue is disabled.
> > +
> > +After disabling and re-enabling a transmit/receive virtqueue, the
> > +device MUST set coalescing parameters of the virtqueue to those
> > +configured using the
> > VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_NOTF_COAL_TX_SET/VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_NOTF_COAL_RX_S
> > ET command, or, if the command did not configure TX/RX coalescing
> > parameters, to 0.
> >
> > A device SHOULD NOT send used buffer notifications to the driver if the
> > notifications are suppressed, even if the notification conditions are met.
> >
> > --
> > 2.19.1.6.gb485710b
>
> Rest looks good to me.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-help@lists.oasis-open.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-02 23:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-01 14:10 [virtio-dev] [PATCH v10] virtio-net: support the virtqueue coalescing moderation Heng Qi
2023-03-02 11:36 ` [virtio-dev] Re: [virtio-comment] " David Edmondson
2023-03-02 12:46 ` Heng Qi
2023-03-02 23:26 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-03-06 22:57 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-03-08 14:24 ` Heng Qi
2023-03-08 16:42 ` [virtio-dev] " Parav Pandit
2023-03-08 17:25 ` [virtio-dev] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-03-02 14:48 ` [virtio-dev] " Parav Pandit
2023-03-02 23:34 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2023-03-07 14:36 ` Parav Pandit
2023-03-03 3:26 ` Heng Qi
2023-03-08 22:30 ` Parav Pandit
2023-03-09 2:58 ` [virtio-dev] Re: [virtio-comment] " Heng Qi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230302183149-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=alvaro.karsz@solid-run.com \
--cc=david.edmondson@oracle.com \
--cc=hengqi@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=parav@nvidia.com \
--cc=virtio-comment@lists.oasis-open.org \
--cc=virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org \
--cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox