From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Heng Qi <hengqi@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org,
virtio-comment@lists.oasis-open.org,
Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>, Parav Pandit <parav@nvidia.com>,
Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [virtio-dev] Re: [Proposal] Relationship between XDP and rx-csum in virtio-net
Date: Tue, 23 May 2023 09:30:28 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230523092237-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230523091820.GC23504@h68b04307.sqa.eu95>
On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 05:18:20PM +0800, Heng Qi wrote:
> On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 03:15:37AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 10:41:18AM +0800, Heng Qi wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 03:10:05PM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 08:12:00PM +0800, Heng Qi wrote:
> > > > > 1) Add a feature bit to the virtio specification to tell the sender that a fully
> > > > > csumed packet must be sent.
> > > >
> > > > Who is the sender in this picture? The driver?
> > >
> > > The device or the driver.
> > >
> > > When the device is hw, the sender is more likely to be a device.
> > > When the device is sw, the sender can be a device or a driver.
> > >
> > > But in general, this feature is inclined to constrain the behavior of the device and
> > > the driver from the receiving side.
> >
> > Based on above I am guessing you are talking about driver getting
> > packets from device, I wish you used terms from virtio spec.
>
> Yes, I'm going to use the terminology of the virtio spec.
>
> >
> > > For example:
> > > VIRTIO_NET_F_UNNECESSARY_CSUM : The driver tells the device that you must send me a fully csumed packet.
> > >
> > > Then the specific implementation can be
> > >
> > > (1) the sender sends a fully csumed packet;
> > > (2) the receiver receives a CHECKSUM_PARTIAL packet, and the device helps calculate the fully csum
> > > (because the two parties in the communication are located on the same host, the packet is trusted.).
> > >
> > > In summary, if VIRTIO_NET_F_UNNECESSARY_CSUM is negotiated, the driver will no longer receive any packets marked CHECKSUM_PARTIAL.
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> >
> > This is what clearing VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_CSUM does.
>
> Yes, but with VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_CSUM cleared, although the device can
> receive a fully checksummed packet, we can no longer enjoy
> the device's ability to validate the packet checksum. That is, the value
> of \field{flags} in the virtio_net_hdr structure is set to 0, which means
> that the packet received by the driver will not be marked as
> VIRTIO_NET_HDR_F_DATA_VALID.
>
> So, we need a feature bit (let's say VIRTIO_NET_F_UNNECESSARY_CSUM).
> If VIRTIO_NET_F_UNNECESSARY_CSUM is negotiated, the device must give the
> driver a fully checksummed packet, and the packet is validated by the
> device with \field{flags} set to VIRTIO_NET_HDR_F_DATA_VALID.
>
> >
> > I feel you are trying to say that clearing VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_CSUM
> > disables all offloads but you want to keep some of them?
> >
>
> No, what I mean is that a feature VIRTIO_NET_F_UNNECESSARY_CSUM is needed
> in addition to VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_CSUM, if both features are negotiated,
> then the driver may always receive packets marked as
> VIRTIO_NET_HDR_F_DATA_VALID, which means that we can now load XDP at the
> same time.
Makes no sense to me. VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_CSUM set already allows
VIRTIO_NET_HDR_F_DATA_VALID:
\item If the VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_CSUM feature was negotiated, the
VIRTIO_NET_HDR_F_NEEDS_CSUM bit in \field{flags} can be
set: if so, the packet checksum at offset \field{csum_offset}
from \field{csum_start} and any preceding checksums
have been validated. The checksum on the packet is incomplete and
if bit VIRTIO_NET_HDR_F_RSC_INFO is not set in \field{flags},
then \field{csum_start} and \field{csum_offset} indicate how to calculate it
(see Packet Transmission point 1).
Did you maybe mean if either feature is negotiated?
> > Again please use virtio terminology not Linux. to help you out,
> > in current linux, VIRTIO_NET_HDR_F_NEEDS_CSUM and VIRTIO_NET_HDR_F_DATA_VALID
> > will set CHECKSUM_PARTIAL and CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY respectively.
> >
>
> Sure. Will do as you suggested.
>
> Thanks.
>
> >
> > --
> > MST
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-help@lists.oasis-open.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-help@lists.oasis-open.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-23 13:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-22 12:12 [virtio-dev] [Proposal] Relationship between XDP and rx-csum in virtio-net Heng Qi
2023-05-22 19:10 ` [virtio-dev] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-05-23 2:41 ` Heng Qi
2023-05-23 7:15 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-05-23 9:18 ` Heng Qi
2023-05-23 13:30 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2023-05-23 13:51 ` [virtio-dev] Re: [virtio-comment] " Heng Qi
2023-05-24 4:09 ` Jason Wang
2023-05-24 5:07 ` [virtio-dev] Re: [virtio-comment] Re: [virtio-dev] Re: [Proposal] Relationship between XDP and rx-csum in virtio-nety Heng Qi
2023-05-24 5:52 ` Jason Wang
2023-05-24 7:24 ` Heng Qi
2023-05-26 7:58 ` [virtio-dev] Re: [virtio-comment] " Heng Qi
2023-05-24 5:17 ` [virtio-dev] Re: [virtio-comment] Re: [virtio-dev] Re: [Proposal] Relationship between XDP and rx-csum in virtio-net Heng Qi
2023-05-24 6:07 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-05-24 8:12 ` Heng Qi
2023-05-30 19:33 ` [virtio-dev] Re: [virtio-comment] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-05-31 6:57 ` Heng Qi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230523092237-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=hengqi@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=parav@nvidia.com \
--cc=virtio-comment@lists.oasis-open.org \
--cc=virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org \
--cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox