public inbox for virtio-dev@lists.linux.dev
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Heng Qi <hengqi@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org,
	virtio-comment@lists.oasis-open.org,
	Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>, Parav Pandit <parav@nvidia.com>,
	Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>
Subject: [virtio-dev] Re: [virtio-comment] Re: [virtio-dev] Re: [Proposal] Relationship between XDP and rx-csum in virtio-net
Date: Wed, 24 May 2023 02:07:14 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230524020227-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230523135144.GD23504@h68b04307.sqa.eu95>

On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 09:51:44PM +0800, Heng Qi wrote:
> On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 09:30:28AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 05:18:20PM +0800, Heng Qi wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 03:15:37AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 10:41:18AM +0800, Heng Qi wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 03:10:05PM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > > > On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 08:12:00PM +0800, Heng Qi wrote:
> > > > > > > 1) Add a feature bit to the virtio specification to tell the sender that a fully
> > > > > > > csumed packet must be sent.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Who is the sender in this picture? The driver?
> > > > > 
> > > > > The device or the driver.
> > > > > 
> > > > > When the device is hw, the sender is more likely to be a device.
> > > > > When the device is sw, the sender can be a device or a driver.
> > > > >
> > > > > But in general, this feature is inclined to constrain the behavior of the device and
> > > > > the driver from the receiving side.
> > > > 
> > > > Based on above I am guessing you are talking about driver getting
> > > > packets from device, I wish you used terms from virtio spec.
> > > 
> > > Yes, I'm going to use the terminology of the virtio spec.
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > > For example: 
> > > > > VIRTIO_NET_F_UNNECESSARY_CSUM : The driver tells the device that you must send me a fully csumed packet.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Then the specific implementation can be
> > > > > 
> > > > > (1) the sender sends a fully csumed packet;
> > > > > (2) the receiver receives a CHECKSUM_PARTIAL packet, and the device helps calculate the fully csum
> > > > >     (because the two parties in the communication are located on the same host, the packet is trusted.).
> > > > > 
> > > > > In summary, if VIRTIO_NET_F_UNNECESSARY_CSUM is negotiated, the driver will no longer receive any packets marked CHECKSUM_PARTIAL.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Thanks.
> > > > 
> > > > This is what clearing VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_CSUM does.
> > > 
> > > Yes, but with VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_CSUM cleared, although the device can
> > > receive a fully checksummed packet, we can no longer enjoy
> > > the device's ability to validate the packet checksum. That is, the value
> > > of \field{flags} in the virtio_net_hdr structure is set to 0, which means
> > > that the packet received by the driver will not be marked as
> > > VIRTIO_NET_HDR_F_DATA_VALID.
> > > 
> > > So, we need a feature bit (let's say VIRTIO_NET_F_UNNECESSARY_CSUM).
> > > If VIRTIO_NET_F_UNNECESSARY_CSUM is negotiated, the device must give the
> > > driver a fully checksummed packet, and the packet is validated by the
> > > device with \field{flags} set to VIRTIO_NET_HDR_F_DATA_VALID.
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > I feel you are trying to say that clearing VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_CSUM
> > > > disables all offloads but you want to keep some of them?
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > No, what I mean is that a feature VIRTIO_NET_F_UNNECESSARY_CSUM is needed
> > > in addition to VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_CSUM, if both features are negotiated,
> > > then the driver may always receive packets marked as
> > > VIRTIO_NET_HDR_F_DATA_VALID, which means that we can now load XDP at the
> > > same time.
> > 
> > Makes no sense to me. VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_CSUM set already allows
> > VIRTIO_NET_HDR_F_DATA_VALID:
> 
> We need to focus on what happens when the XDP program is loaded:
> 
> The current virtio-net needs to turn off the VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_CSUM
> feature when loading XDP. The main reason for doing this is because
> VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_CSUM allows to receive packets marked as
> VIRTIO_NET_HDR_F_NEEDS_CSUM. Such packets are not compatible with
> XDP programs, because we cannot guarantee that the csum_{start, offset}
> fields are correct after XDP modifies the packets.

What do you want the device to do with these packets?
Just clear VIRTIO_NET_HDR_F_NEEDS_CSUM?
Then ... why don't you have the driver clear that bit?

> So in order for the driver to continue to enjoy the device's ability to
> validate packets while XDP is loaded, we need a new feature to tell the
> device not to deliver packets marked as VIRTIO_NET_HDR_F_NEEDS_CSUM (in
> other words, the device can only deliver packets marked as
> VIRTIO_NET_HDR_F_DATA_VALID).
> 
> Thanks.




> > \item If the VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_CSUM feature was negotiated, the
> >   VIRTIO_NET_HDR_F_NEEDS_CSUM bit in \field{flags} can be
> >   set: if so, the packet checksum at offset \field{csum_offset}
> >   from \field{csum_start} and any preceding checksums
> >   have been validated.  The checksum on the packet is incomplete and
> >   if bit VIRTIO_NET_HDR_F_RSC_INFO is not set in \field{flags}, 
> >   then \field{csum_start} and \field{csum_offset} indicate how to calculate it
> >   (see Packet Transmission point 1).
> > 
> > Did you maybe mean if either feature is negotiated?
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > > > Again please use virtio terminology not Linux. to help you out,
> > > > in current linux, VIRTIO_NET_HDR_F_NEEDS_CSUM and VIRTIO_NET_HDR_F_DATA_VALID
> > > > will set CHECKSUM_PARTIAL and CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY respectively.
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > Sure. Will do as you suggested.
> > > 
> > > Thanks.
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > -- 
> > > > MST
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-help@lists.oasis-open.org
> > 
> > 
> > This publicly archived list offers a means to provide input to the
> > OASIS Virtual I/O Device (VIRTIO) TC.
> > 
> > In order to verify user consent to the Feedback License terms and
> > to minimize spam in the list archive, subscription is required
> > before posting.
> > 
> > Subscribe: virtio-comment-subscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
> > Unsubscribe: virtio-comment-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
> > List help: virtio-comment-help@lists.oasis-open.org
> > List archive: https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-comment/
> > Feedback License: https://www.oasis-open.org/who/ipr/feedback_license.pdf
> > List Guidelines: https://www.oasis-open.org/policies-guidelines/mailing-lists
> > Committee: https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/virtio/
> > Join OASIS: https://www.oasis-open.org/join/


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-help@lists.oasis-open.org


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-05-24  6:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-22 12:12 [virtio-dev] [Proposal] Relationship between XDP and rx-csum in virtio-net Heng Qi
2023-05-22 19:10 ` [virtio-dev] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-05-23  2:41   ` Heng Qi
2023-05-23  7:15     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-05-23  9:18       ` Heng Qi
2023-05-23 13:30         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-05-23 13:51           ` [virtio-dev] Re: [virtio-comment] " Heng Qi
2023-05-24  4:09             ` Jason Wang
2023-05-24  5:07               ` [virtio-dev] Re: [virtio-comment] Re: [virtio-dev] Re: [Proposal] Relationship between XDP and rx-csum in virtio-nety Heng Qi
2023-05-24  5:52                 ` Jason Wang
2023-05-24  7:24                   ` Heng Qi
2023-05-26  7:58                     ` [virtio-dev] Re: [virtio-comment] " Heng Qi
2023-05-24  5:17               ` [virtio-dev] Re: [virtio-comment] Re: [virtio-dev] Re: [Proposal] Relationship between XDP and rx-csum in virtio-net Heng Qi
2023-05-24  6:07             ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2023-05-24  8:12               ` Heng Qi
2023-05-30 19:33                 ` [virtio-dev] Re: [virtio-comment] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-05-31  6:57                   ` Heng Qi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230524020227-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
    --to=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=hengqi@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=parav@nvidia.com \
    --cc=virtio-comment@lists.oasis-open.org \
    --cc=virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org \
    --cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox