From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Parav Pandit <parav@nvidia.com>
Cc: "virtio-comment@lists.oasis-open.org"
<virtio-comment@lists.oasis-open.org>,
"cohuck@redhat.com" <cohuck@redhat.com>,
"david.edmondson@oracle.com" <david.edmondson@oracle.com>,
"virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org"
<virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org>,
"sburla@marvell.com" <sburla@marvell.com>,
"jasowang@redhat.com" <jasowang@redhat.com>,
Yishai Hadas <yishaih@nvidia.com>,
Maor Gottlieb <maorg@nvidia.com>,
Shahaf Shuler <shahafs@nvidia.com>
Subject: [virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH v6 3/4] admin: Add group member legacy register access commands
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2023 13:10:57 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230619130440-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <PH0PR12MB54816B14CE2DA659837D1C09DC5FA@PH0PR12MB5481.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 04:45:23PM +0000, Parav Pandit wrote:
>
>
> > From: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> > Sent: Monday, June 19, 2023 12:40 PM
> > > >
> > > > we can just say "the legacy interface of member devices"
> > > >
> > > What is the harm in telling explicitly what is currently supported, specially
> > when it theory of operation description section.
> >
> > The harm is that
> > - making things generic on the 1st try is the only stick we have
> > as contributors always push to make their solutions as
> > specific to their needs as possible
> > - people are lazy and they will copy text and then I get to repeat this argument
> > all over again.
> >
>
> The "legacy interface of member device" is a vague term. As implementer, reader I don't understand what that means.
> The commands clearly communicate the scope.
Add this as an example then.
> > If you want to also have a type specific text, be my guest "specifically, for an
> > SRIOV type" ....
> >
> SRIOV in generic section doesn't make sense. It is covered in the pci transport section.
When it's convenient to you you argue that it's clearer, when it's not
you want it generic. Just mention it quickly and link to the specific
text in the new section.
Look the only reason I personally am even entertaining this over
objections of several members is that this stuff has the potentional to
be well contained. That's the only argument, otherwise individual
features like _F_LEGACY_MAC would win hands down - this is how we always
did it. If you are intent on spreading this all over the spec
we'll need to rethink the whole approach.
> >
> > > > > using following listed
> > > >
> > > > using the following
> > > >
> > > > > +administrative commands:
> > > >
> > > > administration not administrative
> > > >
> > > Ack.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-help@lists.oasis-open.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-19 17:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-13 17:30 [virtio-dev] [PATCH v6 0/4] admin: Introduce legacy registers access using AQ Parav Pandit
2023-06-13 17:30 ` [virtio-dev] [PATCH v6 1/4] admin: Split opcode table rows with a line Parav Pandit
2023-06-13 17:30 ` [virtio-dev] [PATCH v6 2/4] admin: Fix section numbering Parav Pandit
2023-06-13 17:30 ` [virtio-dev] [PATCH v6 3/4] admin: Add group member legacy register access commands Parav Pandit
2023-06-19 16:20 ` [virtio-dev] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-06-19 16:29 ` [virtio-dev] " Parav Pandit
2023-06-19 16:40 ` [virtio-dev] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-06-19 16:45 ` [virtio-dev] " Parav Pandit
2023-06-19 17:10 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2023-06-19 17:21 ` [virtio-dev] " Parav Pandit
2023-06-19 17:33 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-06-19 17:38 ` Parav Pandit
2023-06-13 17:30 ` [virtio-dev] [PATCH v6 4/4] transport-pci: Introduce group legacy group member config region access Parav Pandit
2023-06-19 16:16 ` [virtio-dev] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-06-19 21:07 ` [virtio-dev] " Parav Pandit
2023-06-21 20:05 ` [virtio-dev] Re: [virtio-comment] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-06-21 20:22 ` [virtio-dev] " Parav Pandit
2023-06-21 20:31 ` [virtio-dev] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-06-21 20:43 ` [virtio-dev] " Parav Pandit
2023-06-19 16:37 ` [virtio-dev] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-06-19 16:39 ` [virtio-dev] " Parav Pandit
2023-06-19 17:19 ` [virtio-dev] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-06-19 17:26 ` [virtio-dev] " Parav Pandit
2023-06-19 17:37 ` [virtio-dev] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-06-19 17:45 ` [virtio-dev] " Parav Pandit
2023-06-19 17:57 ` [virtio-dev] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-06-19 18:07 ` [virtio-dev] " Parav Pandit
2023-06-20 14:12 ` Parav Pandit
2023-06-21 15:50 ` Parav Pandit
2023-06-21 15:56 ` [virtio-dev] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-06-21 16:01 ` [virtio-dev] " Parav Pandit
2023-06-21 19:43 ` [virtio-dev] Re: [virtio-comment] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-06-21 20:04 ` [virtio-dev] " Parav Pandit
2023-06-21 20:08 ` [virtio-dev] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-06-19 18:00 ` [virtio-dev] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-06-19 18:12 ` [virtio-dev] " Parav Pandit
2023-06-21 19:47 ` [virtio-dev] Re: [virtio-comment] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-06-19 17:04 ` [virtio-dev] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-06-19 17:11 ` Parav Pandit
2023-06-19 17:26 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-06-19 17:35 ` Parav Pandit
2023-06-19 17:46 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-06-20 0:14 ` Parav Pandit
2023-06-20 10:21 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-06-21 1:09 ` Parav Pandit
2023-06-21 5:05 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-06-19 12:38 ` [virtio-dev] RE: [PATCH v6 0/4] admin: Introduce legacy registers access using AQ Parav Pandit
2023-06-19 15:18 ` [virtio-dev] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-06-19 15:58 ` [virtio-dev] " Parav Pandit
2023-06-19 16:28 ` [virtio-dev] " Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230619130440-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david.edmondson@oracle.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=maorg@nvidia.com \
--cc=parav@nvidia.com \
--cc=sburla@marvell.com \
--cc=shahafs@nvidia.com \
--cc=virtio-comment@lists.oasis-open.org \
--cc=virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org \
--cc=yishaih@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox