From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
To: Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@intel.com>
Cc: jasowang@redhat.com, mst@redhat.com, eperezma@redhat.com,
cohuck@redhat.com, virtio-comment@lists.oasis-open.org,
virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [virtio-dev] Re: [virtio-comment] [RFC PATCH 1/5] virtio: introduce SUSPEND bit in device status
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2023 10:30:39 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230814143039.GD3146793@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230814192904.30062-2-lingshan.zhu@intel.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4452 bytes --]
On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 03:29:00AM +0800, Zhu Lingshan wrote:
> This patch introudces a new status bit in the device status: SUSPEND.
>
> This SUSPEND bit can be used by the driver to suspend a device,
> in order to stablize the device states and virtqueue states.
>
> Its main use case is live migration.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Eugenio PÃrez <eperezma@redhat.com>
There is an character encoding issue in Eugenio's surname.
> Signed-off-by: Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@intel.com>
> ---
> content.tex | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
This patch hints at the asynchronous nature of the SUSPEND bit (the
driver must re-read the Device Status Field) but doesn't explain the
rationale or any limits.
For example, is there a timeout or should the driver re-read the Device
Status Field forever?
Does the driver need to re-read the Device Status Field after clearing
the SUSPEND bit?
>
> diff --git a/content.tex b/content.tex
> index 0a62dce..1bb4401 100644
> --- a/content.tex
> +++ b/content.tex
> @@ -47,6 +47,9 @@ \section{\field{Device Status} Field}\label{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Dev
> \item[DRIVER_OK (4)] Indicates that the driver is set up and ready to
> drive the device.
>
> +\item[SUSPEND (16)] When VIRTIO_F_SUSPEND is negotiated, indicates that the
> + device has been suspended by the driver.
> +
> \item[DEVICE_NEEDS_RESET (64)] Indicates that the device has experienced
> an error from which it can't recover.
> \end{description}
> @@ -73,6 +76,10 @@ \section{\field{Device Status} Field}\label{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Dev
> recover by issuing a reset.
> \end{note}
>
> +The driver MUST NOT set SUSPEND if FEATURES_OK is not set.
> +
> +When set SUSPEND, the driver MUST re-read \field{device status} to ensure the SUSPEND bit is set.
"When setting SUSPEND, ..." would be grammatically correct. Another
option is "After setting the SUSPEND bit, ...".
> +
> \devicenormative{\subsection}{Device Status Field}{Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Device Status Field}
>
> The device MUST NOT consume buffers or send any used buffer
> @@ -82,6 +89,13 @@ \section{\field{Device Status} Field}\label{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Dev
> that a reset is needed. If DRIVER_OK is set, after it sets DEVICE_NEEDS_RESET, the device
> MUST send a device configuration change notification to the driver.
>
> +The device MUST ignore SUSPEND if FEATURES_OK is not set.
> +
> +The deivce MUST ignore SUSPEND if VIRTIO_F_SUSPEND is not negotiated.
> +
> +If VIRTIO_F_SUSPEND is negotiated and SUSPEND is set, the device MUST clear SUSPEND
> +and resumes operation upon DRIVER_OK.
I can't parse this sentence. If the driver writes SUSPEND | DRIVER_OK |
... to the Device Status Field, then the device accepts DRIVER_OK and
clears SUSPEND?
Why?
> +
> \section{Feature Bits}\label{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Feature Bits}
>
> Each virtio device offers all the features it understands. During
> @@ -872,6 +886,10 @@ \chapter{Reserved Feature Bits}\label{sec:Reserved Feature Bits}
> \ref{devicenormative:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Feature Bits} for
> handling features reserved for future use.
>
> + \item[VIRTIO_F_SUSPEND(41)] This feature indicates that the driver can
> + SUSPEND the device.
> + See \ref{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Device Status Field}.
> +
> \end{description}
>
> \drivernormative{\section}{Reserved Feature Bits}{Reserved Feature Bits}
> --
> 2.35.3
>
>
> This publicly archived list offers a means to provide input to the
> OASIS Virtual I/O Device (VIRTIO) TC.
>
> In order to verify user consent to the Feedback License terms and
> to minimize spam in the list archive, subscription is required
> before posting.
>
> Subscribe: virtio-comment-subscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
> Unsubscribe: virtio-comment-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
> List help: virtio-comment-help@lists.oasis-open.org
> List archive: https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-comment/
> Feedback License: https://www.oasis-open.org/who/ipr/feedback_license.pdf
> List Guidelines: https://www.oasis-open.org/policies-guidelines/mailing-lists
> Committee: https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/virtio/
> Join OASIS: https://www.oasis-open.org/join/
>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-14 16:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-14 19:28 [virtio-dev] [RFC PATCH 0/5] virtio: introduce SUSPEND bit and vq state Zhu Lingshan
2023-08-14 14:20 ` [virtio-dev] Re: [virtio-comment] " Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-08-14 15:47 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-08-15 1:38 ` Jason Wang
2023-08-15 10:14 ` Zhu, Lingshan
2023-08-14 19:29 ` [virtio-dev] [RFC PATCH 1/5] virtio: introduce SUSPEND bit in device status Zhu Lingshan
2023-08-14 14:30 ` Stefan Hajnoczi [this message]
2023-08-15 10:31 ` [virtio-dev] Re: [virtio-comment] " Zhu, Lingshan
2023-08-15 12:29 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-08-17 15:15 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2023-08-17 16:04 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-08-18 9:55 ` Zhu, Lingshan
2023-08-21 13:45 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-08-15 0:26 ` [virtio-dev] " Jason Wang
2023-08-15 0:37 ` Jason Wang
2023-08-15 10:48 ` Zhu, Lingshan
2023-08-16 1:58 ` Jason Wang
2023-08-16 2:17 ` Zhu, Lingshan
2023-08-15 10:50 ` Zhu, Lingshan
2023-08-16 2:05 ` [virtio-dev] Re: [virtio-comment] " Jason Wang
2023-08-16 2:20 ` Zhu, Lingshan
2023-08-14 19:29 ` [virtio-dev] [RFC PATCH 2/5] virtio: introduce vq state as basic facility Zhu Lingshan
2023-08-14 14:49 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-08-15 10:53 ` Zhu, Lingshan
2023-08-14 19:29 ` [virtio-dev] [RFC PATCH 3/5] virtio: The actions by the device upon SUSPEND Zhu Lingshan
2023-08-14 15:00 ` [virtio-dev] Re: [virtio-comment] " Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-08-15 11:07 ` Zhu, Lingshan
2023-08-15 12:33 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-08-16 4:25 ` Zhu, Lingshan
2023-08-16 12:33 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-08-15 0:29 ` [virtio-dev] " Jason Wang
2023-08-15 11:16 ` Zhu, Lingshan
2023-08-16 2:10 ` Jason Wang
2023-08-16 4:53 ` Zhu, Lingshan
2023-08-14 19:29 ` [virtio-dev] [RFC PATCH 4/5] virtqueue: constraints for virtqueue state Zhu Lingshan
2023-08-14 15:15 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-08-15 11:18 ` Zhu, Lingshan
2023-08-15 0:34 ` [virtio-dev] " Jason Wang
2023-08-15 11:30 ` Zhu, Lingshan
2023-08-16 2:11 ` Jason Wang
2023-08-16 5:07 ` Zhu, Lingshan
[not found] ` <SN6PR11MB3517EF23D99CE4FDA8DDB22DFF1AA@SN6PR11MB3517.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
2023-08-17 8:42 ` [virtio-dev] Re: [virtio-comment] " Zhu, Lingshan
2023-08-21 4:03 ` Jason Wang
2023-08-17 15:19 ` [virtio-dev] " Eugenio Perez Martin
2023-08-18 9:44 ` Zhu, Lingshan
2023-08-21 9:26 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2023-08-21 10:32 ` [virtio-dev] Re: [virtio-comment] " Zhu, Lingshan
2023-09-05 9:08 ` Zhu, Lingshan
2023-09-07 8:09 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2023-09-07 9:34 ` Zhu, Lingshan
2023-09-08 6:23 ` Si-Wei Liu
2023-09-08 8:41 ` Zhu, Lingshan
2023-08-14 19:29 ` [virtio-dev] [RFC PATCH 5/5] virtio-pci: implement VIRTIO_F_QUEUE_STATE Zhu Lingshan
2023-08-14 15:18 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-08-15 11:31 ` [virtio-dev] Re: [virtio-comment] " Zhu, Lingshan
2023-08-15 0:35 ` [virtio-dev] " Jason Wang
2023-08-15 11:31 ` Zhu, Lingshan
2023-08-17 3:04 ` [virtio-dev] Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] virtio: introduce SUSPEND bit and vq state Zhu, Lingshan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230814143039.GD3146793@fedora \
--to=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=lingshan.zhu@intel.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=virtio-comment@lists.oasis-open.org \
--cc=virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox