public inbox for virtio-dev@lists.linux.dev
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
To: Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@intel.com>
Cc: jasowang@redhat.com, mst@redhat.com, eperezma@redhat.com,
	cohuck@redhat.com, virtio-comment@lists.oasis-open.org,
	virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [virtio-dev] Re: [virtio-comment] [RFC PATCH 1/5] virtio: introduce SUSPEND bit in device status
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2023 10:30:39 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230814143039.GD3146793@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230814192904.30062-2-lingshan.zhu@intel.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4452 bytes --]

On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 03:29:00AM +0800, Zhu Lingshan wrote:
> This patch introudces a new status bit in the device status: SUSPEND.
> 
> This SUSPEND bit can be used by the driver to suspend a device,
> in order to stablize the device states and virtqueue states.
> 
> Its main use case is live migration.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Eugenio PÃrez <eperezma@redhat.com>

There is an character encoding issue in Eugenio's surname.

> Signed-off-by: Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@intel.com>
> ---
>  content.tex | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)

This patch hints at the asynchronous nature of the SUSPEND bit (the
driver must re-read the Device Status Field) but doesn't explain the
rationale or any limits.

For example, is there a timeout or should the driver re-read the Device
Status Field forever?

Does the driver need to re-read the Device Status Field after clearing
the SUSPEND bit?

> 
> diff --git a/content.tex b/content.tex
> index 0a62dce..1bb4401 100644
> --- a/content.tex
> +++ b/content.tex
> @@ -47,6 +47,9 @@ \section{\field{Device Status} Field}\label{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Dev
>  \item[DRIVER_OK (4)] Indicates that the driver is set up and ready to
>    drive the device.
>  
> +\item[SUSPEND (16)] When VIRTIO_F_SUSPEND is negotiated, indicates that the
> +  device has been suspended by the driver.
> +
>  \item[DEVICE_NEEDS_RESET (64)] Indicates that the device has experienced
>    an error from which it can't recover.
>  \end{description}
> @@ -73,6 +76,10 @@ \section{\field{Device Status} Field}\label{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Dev
>  recover by issuing a reset.
>  \end{note}
>  
> +The driver MUST NOT set SUSPEND if FEATURES_OK is not set.
> +
> +When set SUSPEND, the driver MUST re-read \field{device status} to ensure the SUSPEND bit is set.

"When setting SUSPEND, ..." would be grammatically correct. Another
option is "After setting the SUSPEND bit, ...".

> +
>  \devicenormative{\subsection}{Device Status Field}{Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Device Status Field}
>  
>  The device MUST NOT consume buffers or send any used buffer
> @@ -82,6 +89,13 @@ \section{\field{Device Status} Field}\label{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Dev
>  that a reset is needed.  If DRIVER_OK is set, after it sets DEVICE_NEEDS_RESET, the device
>  MUST send a device configuration change notification to the driver.
>  
> +The device MUST ignore SUSPEND if FEATURES_OK is not set.
> +
> +The deivce MUST ignore SUSPEND if VIRTIO_F_SUSPEND is not negotiated.
> +
> +If VIRTIO_F_SUSPEND is negotiated and SUSPEND is set, the device MUST clear SUSPEND
> +and resumes operation upon DRIVER_OK.

I can't parse this sentence. If the driver writes SUSPEND | DRIVER_OK |
... to the Device Status Field, then the device accepts DRIVER_OK and
clears SUSPEND?

Why?

> +
>  \section{Feature Bits}\label{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Feature Bits}
>  
>  Each virtio device offers all the features it understands.  During
> @@ -872,6 +886,10 @@ \chapter{Reserved Feature Bits}\label{sec:Reserved Feature Bits}
>  	\ref{devicenormative:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Feature Bits} for
>  	handling features reserved for future use.
>  
> +  \item[VIRTIO_F_SUSPEND(41)] This feature indicates that the driver can
> +   SUSPEND the device.
> +   See \ref{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Device Status Field}.
> +
>  \end{description}
>  
>  \drivernormative{\section}{Reserved Feature Bits}{Reserved Feature Bits}
> -- 
> 2.35.3
> 
> 
> This publicly archived list offers a means to provide input to the
> OASIS Virtual I/O Device (VIRTIO) TC.
> 
> In order to verify user consent to the Feedback License terms and
> to minimize spam in the list archive, subscription is required
> before posting.
> 
> Subscribe: virtio-comment-subscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
> Unsubscribe: virtio-comment-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
> List help: virtio-comment-help@lists.oasis-open.org
> List archive: https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-comment/
> Feedback License: https://www.oasis-open.org/who/ipr/feedback_license.pdf
> List Guidelines: https://www.oasis-open.org/policies-guidelines/mailing-lists
> Committee: https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/virtio/
> Join OASIS: https://www.oasis-open.org/join/
> 

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2023-08-14 16:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-14 19:28 [virtio-dev] [RFC PATCH 0/5] virtio: introduce SUSPEND bit and vq state Zhu Lingshan
2023-08-14 14:20 ` [virtio-dev] Re: [virtio-comment] " Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-08-14 15:47 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-08-15  1:38   ` Jason Wang
2023-08-15 10:14     ` Zhu, Lingshan
2023-08-14 19:29 ` [virtio-dev] [RFC PATCH 1/5] virtio: introduce SUSPEND bit in device status Zhu Lingshan
2023-08-14 14:30   ` Stefan Hajnoczi [this message]
2023-08-15 10:31     ` [virtio-dev] Re: [virtio-comment] " Zhu, Lingshan
2023-08-15 12:29       ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-08-17 15:15         ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2023-08-17 16:04           ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-08-18  9:55             ` Zhu, Lingshan
2023-08-21 13:45               ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-08-15  0:26   ` [virtio-dev] " Jason Wang
2023-08-15  0:37     ` Jason Wang
2023-08-15 10:48       ` Zhu, Lingshan
2023-08-16  1:58         ` Jason Wang
2023-08-16  2:17           ` Zhu, Lingshan
2023-08-15 10:50       ` Zhu, Lingshan
2023-08-16  2:05         ` [virtio-dev] Re: [virtio-comment] " Jason Wang
2023-08-16  2:20           ` Zhu, Lingshan
2023-08-14 19:29 ` [virtio-dev] [RFC PATCH 2/5] virtio: introduce vq state as basic facility Zhu Lingshan
2023-08-14 14:49   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-08-15 10:53     ` Zhu, Lingshan
2023-08-14 19:29 ` [virtio-dev] [RFC PATCH 3/5] virtio: The actions by the device upon SUSPEND Zhu Lingshan
2023-08-14 15:00   ` [virtio-dev] Re: [virtio-comment] " Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-08-15 11:07     ` Zhu, Lingshan
2023-08-15 12:33       ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-08-16  4:25         ` Zhu, Lingshan
2023-08-16 12:33           ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-08-15  0:29   ` [virtio-dev] " Jason Wang
2023-08-15 11:16     ` Zhu, Lingshan
2023-08-16  2:10       ` Jason Wang
2023-08-16  4:53         ` Zhu, Lingshan
2023-08-14 19:29 ` [virtio-dev] [RFC PATCH 4/5] virtqueue: constraints for virtqueue state Zhu Lingshan
2023-08-14 15:15   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-08-15 11:18     ` Zhu, Lingshan
2023-08-15  0:34   ` [virtio-dev] " Jason Wang
2023-08-15 11:30     ` Zhu, Lingshan
2023-08-16  2:11       ` Jason Wang
2023-08-16  5:07         ` Zhu, Lingshan
     [not found]       ` <SN6PR11MB3517EF23D99CE4FDA8DDB22DFF1AA@SN6PR11MB3517.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
2023-08-17  8:42         ` [virtio-dev] Re: [virtio-comment] " Zhu, Lingshan
2023-08-21  4:03           ` Jason Wang
2023-08-17 15:19       ` [virtio-dev] " Eugenio Perez Martin
2023-08-18  9:44         ` Zhu, Lingshan
2023-08-21  9:26           ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2023-08-21 10:32             ` [virtio-dev] Re: [virtio-comment] " Zhu, Lingshan
2023-09-05  9:08             ` Zhu, Lingshan
2023-09-07  8:09               ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2023-09-07  9:34                 ` Zhu, Lingshan
2023-09-08  6:23                   ` Si-Wei Liu
2023-09-08  8:41                     ` Zhu, Lingshan
2023-08-14 19:29 ` [virtio-dev] [RFC PATCH 5/5] virtio-pci: implement VIRTIO_F_QUEUE_STATE Zhu Lingshan
2023-08-14 15:18   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-08-15 11:31     ` [virtio-dev] Re: [virtio-comment] " Zhu, Lingshan
2023-08-15  0:35   ` [virtio-dev] " Jason Wang
2023-08-15 11:31     ` Zhu, Lingshan
2023-08-17  3:04 ` [virtio-dev] Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] virtio: introduce SUSPEND bit and vq state Zhu, Lingshan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230814143039.GD3146793@fedora \
    --to=stefanha@redhat.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=lingshan.zhu@intel.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=virtio-comment@lists.oasis-open.org \
    --cc=virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox