From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Babis Chalios <bchalios@amazon.es>
Cc: virtio-comment@lists.oasis-open.org,
virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org, "Cali,
Marco" <xmarcalx@amazon.co.uk>, "Graf (AWS),
Alexander" <graf@amazon.de>,
"Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>,
aams@amazon.de
Subject: Re: [virtio-dev] [PATCH RFC 3/3] rng: leak detection support
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2023 17:05:27 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230912170032-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0abb7518-16e0-4227-bfe1-a29bd27124e8@amazon.es>
On Thu, Aug 31, 2023 at 12:16:22PM +0200, Babis Chalios wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> On 21/11/22 17:30, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > Add virtqueues to support reporting entropy leaks (similar to virtio based vmgenid).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > virtio-rng.tex | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 60 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/virtio-rng.tex b/virtio-rng.tex
> > index 1ec7164..4760dfa 100644
> > --- a/virtio-rng.tex
> > +++ b/virtio-rng.tex
> > @@ -9,10 +9,14 @@ \subsection{Device ID}\label{sec:Device Types / Entropy Device / Device ID}
> > \subsection{Virtqueues}\label{sec:Device Types / Entropy Device / Virtqueues}
> > \begin{description}
> > \item[0] requestq
> > +\item[1] leakq1 (only if VIRTIO_RNG_F_LEAK is offered)
> > +\item[2] leakq2 (only if VIRTIO_RNG_F_LEAK is offered)
> > \end{description}
> > \subsection{Feature bits}\label{sec:Device Types / Entropy Device / Feature bits}
> > - None currently defined
> > +\begin{description}
> > +\item[VIRTIO_RNG_F_LEAK (0)] Device can report and handle information leaks.
> > +\end{description}
> > \subsection{Device configuration layout}\label{sec:Device Types / Entropy Device / Device configuration layout}
> > None currently defined.
> > @@ -21,6 +25,7 @@ \subsection{Device Initialization}\label{sec:Device Types / Entropy Device / Dev
> > \begin{enumerate}
> > \item The \field{requestq} virtqueue is initialized
> > +\item If VIRTIO_RNG_F_LEAK has been negotiated, \field{leakq1} and \field{leakq2} are initialized
> > \end{enumerate}
> > \subsection{Device Operation}\label{sec:Device Types / Entropy Device / Device Operation}
> > @@ -41,3 +46,57 @@ \subsection{Device Operation}\label{sec:Device Types / Entropy Device / Device O
> > The device MUST place one or more random bytes into the buffer
> > made available to it through \field{requestq}, but it
> > MAY use less than the entire buffer length.
> > +
> > +\subsubsection{Reporting Information Leaks}{Device Types / Entropy Device / Device Operation / Reporting Information Leaks}
> > +
> > +The device might, after the fact, detect that some of the entropy
> > +it supplied to the driver has after the fact degraded in quality
> > +or leaked to the outside world. One example is when the device
> > +is part of the virtual machine undergoing a restore from snapshot
> > +operation. Another example is when the information leaks from the
> > +host system through a side-channel.
> > +
> > +The driver would typically react by causing regeneration of any
> > +information that might have leaked and that has to be secret or
> > +unique. It is understood that when an information leak has been
> > +detected it is likely not limited to the entropy received through
> > +the specific device. In particular, this is the case for
> > +snapshoting It is thus suggested that the system fully
> > +regenerate any unique/secret information in this scenario.
> > +
> > +If VIRTIO_RNG_F_LEAK has been negotiated the device can report
> > +such leaks to the driver through a set of dedicated leak
> > +queues: \field{leakq1} and \field{leakq2}.
> > +
> > +Buffers added to the leak queues can have one of two forms:
> > +\begin{enumerate}
> > +\item A write-only buffer. It will be completely filled by random data by the device.
> > +\item A buffer consisting of read-only section followed by a
> > +write-only section, both of identical size. The
> > +device will copy data from the read-only section to the write-only
> > +section.
> > +\end{enumerate}
> > +
> > +The steps for operating the virtqueue are:
> > +
> > +\begin{enumerate}
> > +\item At each time, only one of \field{leakq1}, \field{leakq2} is active
> > + (has buffers added/used).
> > +\item After initialization, \field{leakq1} is active.
> > +\item Driver adds multiple buffers to the active leak queue.
> > +\item The buffers are not used until an information leak is
> > + detected, as long as that is the case driver can
> > + add more buffers to the active queue.
> > +\item Upon detecting an information leak, device starts
> > + using buffers in the active leak queue.
> > +\item Upon detecting that buffers have been used, driver
> > + switches to another leak queue making it active
> > + (e.g. from \field{leakq1} to \field{leakq2} or vice versa).
> > + It then starts adding buffers to the new leak queue.\
>
> I have been discussing with Alex and we think there's a potential race here,
> between the time the driver
> sees the used buffers in the active leak queue until the time it adds new
> buffers to the next leak queue.
> If a new entropy leak event arrives the VMM won't find any buffers in the
> queue.
I do not understand why this matters though. we know there was a leak,
why does it matter whether there was one or two leaks?
> In the last RFC implementing this in Linux we sent to LKML [1] we avoid the
> issue by pre-populating both
> queues, but that does not solve the problem if a third entropy leak event
> arrives. The probability of this
> happening is indeed small, but we thought of a potential solution to this.
>
> What if we modify the spec here to instruct the VMM to deny taking a
> snapshot if there are not any buffers
> in the active leak queue? If we did this, we could even simplify the spec to
> just introduce a single entropy
> leak queue, so we could avoid the complexity of switching between active
> leak queues in the driver and
> the device. WDYT?
here's the problem:
- driver adds batch 1 of buffers
- leak
- device starts using buffers from batch 1
- driver sees some buffers and starts adding batch 2
- device sees batch 2 and thinks this is part of batch 1
consumes them all
> Cheers,
> Babis
>
> [1]
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230823090107.65749-3-bchalios@amazon.es/T/
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-help@lists.oasis-open.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-help@lists.oasis-open.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-12 21:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-21 16:30 [virtio-comment] [PATCH RFC 0/3] virtio-rng based entropy leak reporting Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-11-21 16:30 ` [virtio-comment] [PATCH RFC 1/3] rng: move to a file of its own Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-11-21 16:30 ` [virtio-comment] [PATCH RFC 2/3] rng: be specific about the virtqueue Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-11-21 16:30 ` [virtio-dev] [PATCH RFC 3/3] rng: leak detection support Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-11-25 12:41 ` [virtio-dev] " Babis Chalios
2022-12-12 10:10 ` Babis Chalios
2023-01-11 13:57 ` Babis Chalios
2023-08-31 10:16 ` [virtio-dev] " Babis Chalios
2023-09-12 21:05 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2023-09-13 9:32 ` Babis Chalios
2023-09-13 9:37 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-09-13 11:19 ` Babis Chalios
2023-09-18 11:14 ` Babis Chalios
2023-09-18 12:41 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-09-18 13:00 ` Babis Chalios
2023-09-18 13:58 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-09-18 14:02 ` Babis Chalios
2023-09-18 14:05 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-09-18 16:30 ` Babis Chalios
2023-09-19 7:32 ` Babis Chalios
2023-09-19 10:01 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-09-19 10:11 ` Babis Chalios
2023-09-22 12:30 ` Babis Chalios
2023-09-22 15:06 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-09-22 15:40 ` Babis Chalios
2023-09-22 16:01 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-09-27 10:43 ` Babis Chalios
2023-09-27 21:47 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-09-28 18:16 ` Babis Chalios
2023-10-13 7:49 ` Babis Chalios
2023-10-13 13:38 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-11-02 11:20 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-11-02 11:38 ` Babis Chalios
2023-11-02 11:51 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-11-02 13:42 ` Babis Chalios
2023-11-02 11:25 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-11-02 11:51 ` Babis Chalios
2023-01-12 7:02 ` [virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH RFC 0/3] virtio-rng based entropy leak reporting Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-01-16 11:39 ` Babis Chalios
[not found] ` <CAHmME9ry2fss2gsbPs2zVJkY=8Cdeae0XFD9FzCVnW67Xy3thA@mail.gmail.com>
2023-01-16 18:11 ` [virtio-comment] " Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230912170032-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
--cc=aams@amazon.de \
--cc=bchalios@amazon.es \
--cc=graf@amazon.de \
--cc=virtio-comment@lists.oasis-open.org \
--cc=virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org \
--cc=xmarcalx@amazon.co.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox