public inbox for virtio-dev@lists.linux.dev
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Babis Chalios <bchalios@amazon.es>
Cc: virtio-comment@lists.oasis-open.org,
	virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org, "Cali,
	Marco" <xmarcalx@amazon.co.uk>, "Graf (AWS),
	Alexander" <graf@amazon.de>,
	"Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>,
	aams@amazon.de
Subject: Re: [virtio-dev] [PATCH RFC 3/3] rng: leak detection support
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2023 08:41:13 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230918083722-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d7d17e9f-e6ad-4106-a408-99281382a93f@amazon.es>

On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 01:19:49PM +0200, Babis Chalios wrote:
> 
> 
> On 13/9/23 11:37, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the content is safe.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 11:32:57AM +0200, Babis Chalios wrote:
> > > > I do not understand why this matters though. we know there was a leak,
> > > > why does it matter whether there was one or two leaks?
> > > > 
> > > > > In the last RFC implementing this in Linux we sent to LKML [1] we avoid
> > > the
> > > > > issue by pre-populating both
> > > > > queues, but that does not solve the problem if a third entropy leak
> > > event
> > > > > arrives. The probability of this
> > > > > happening is indeed small, but we thought of a potential solution to
> > > this.
> > > > > What if we modify the spec here to instruct the VMM to deny taking a
> > > > > snapshot if there are not any buffers
> > > > > in the active leak queue? If we did this, we could even simplify the
> > > spec to
> > > > > just introduce a single entropy
> > > > > leak queue, so we could avoid the complexity of switching between active
> > > > > leak queues in the driver and
> > > > > the device. WDYT?
> > > > here's the problem:
> > > > 
> > > > - driver adds batch 1 of buffers
> > > > - leak
> > > > - device starts using buffers from batch 1
> > > > - driver sees some buffers and starts adding batch 2
> > > If understand this clause:
> > > 
> > > > > +\item Upon detecting that buffers have been used, driver
> > > > > +      switches to another leak queue making it active
> > > > > +      (e.g. from \field{leakq1} to \field{leakq2} or vice versa).
> > > > > +      It then starts adding buffers to the new leak queue.
> > > correctly:
> > > 
> > > At this point, the driver will first switch active leak queue and
> > > then add batch 2 to the new leak queue.
> > > 
> > > and due to this:
> > > 
> > > > > +\item Device will keep using buffers in the active leak queue
> > > > > +      until it detects that both the current leak queue is empty and
> > > another
> > > > > +      leak queue has buffers. At that point device switches to
> > > > > +      another leak queue, making it active.
> > > > > +\item After the switch, buffers from the new leak queue are not
> > > > > +      used until an information leak is detected.
> > > > > +\end{enumerate}
> > > the following won't happen:
> > > 
> > > > - device sees batch 2 and thinks this is part of batch 1
> > > >      consumes them all
> > > Does it make sense?
> > > 
> > > Cheers,
> > > Babis
> > yes, the queue switch is used as a barrier to detect a new leak event.
> 
> Right, so I think that there is a race condition between the time the driver
> sees the used buffers of the first
> batch and until it adds the second batch on the next leak queue.
> 
> 1. driver adds batch 1
> 2. leak event
> 3. device uses batch 1
> 4. driver sees the used buffers and
>     a. switches leak queues
>     b. adds batch 2.
> 5. devices finds initial leak queue empty and sees buffers in second leak
> queue.
> 
> If a second leak event happens after step 3 above and before all of steps 4
> complete then batch 2 will not
> be processed as part of the second leak event.

driver can just pre-add buffers in the second queue.

1. available buffers to queue 1-X
2. available buffers to queue X


3. poll queue X
4. used buffers in queue X
5. avail buffers in queue X
6. poll queue 1-X
7. used buffers in queue X
8. avail buffers in queue X
9. goto 3




> > --
> > MST
> > 
> > 
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-help@lists.oasis-open.org
> > 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-help@lists.oasis-open.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-help@lists.oasis-open.org


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-09-18 12:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-21 16:30 [virtio-comment] [PATCH RFC 0/3] virtio-rng based entropy leak reporting Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-11-21 16:30 ` [virtio-comment] [PATCH RFC 1/3] rng: move to a file of its own Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-11-21 16:30 ` [virtio-comment] [PATCH RFC 2/3] rng: be specific about the virtqueue Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-11-21 16:30 ` [virtio-dev] [PATCH RFC 3/3] rng: leak detection support Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-11-25 12:41   ` [virtio-dev] " Babis Chalios
2022-12-12 10:10     ` Babis Chalios
2023-01-11 13:57   ` Babis Chalios
2023-08-31 10:16   ` [virtio-dev] " Babis Chalios
2023-09-12 21:05     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-09-13  9:32       ` Babis Chalios
2023-09-13  9:37         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-09-13 11:19           ` Babis Chalios
2023-09-18 11:14             ` Babis Chalios
2023-09-18 12:41             ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2023-09-18 13:00               ` Babis Chalios
2023-09-18 13:58                 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-09-18 14:02                   ` Babis Chalios
2023-09-18 14:05                     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-09-18 16:30                       ` Babis Chalios
2023-09-19  7:32                         ` Babis Chalios
2023-09-19 10:01                           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-09-19 10:11                             ` Babis Chalios
2023-09-22 12:30                               ` Babis Chalios
2023-09-22 15:06                               ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-09-22 15:40                                 ` Babis Chalios
2023-09-22 16:01                                   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-09-27 10:43                                     ` Babis Chalios
2023-09-27 21:47                                       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-09-28 18:16                                         ` Babis Chalios
2023-10-13  7:49                                           ` Babis Chalios
2023-10-13 13:38                                             ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-11-02 11:20                                           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-11-02 11:38                                             ` Babis Chalios
2023-11-02 11:51                                               ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-11-02 13:42                                                 ` Babis Chalios
2023-11-02 11:25                                   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-11-02 11:51                                     ` Babis Chalios
2023-01-12  7:02 ` [virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH RFC 0/3] virtio-rng based entropy leak reporting Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-01-16 11:39   ` Babis Chalios
     [not found]     ` <CAHmME9ry2fss2gsbPs2zVJkY=8Cdeae0XFD9FzCVnW67Xy3thA@mail.gmail.com>
2023-01-16 18:11       ` [virtio-comment] " Michael S. Tsirkin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230918083722-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
    --to=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
    --cc=aams@amazon.de \
    --cc=bchalios@amazon.es \
    --cc=graf@amazon.de \
    --cc=virtio-comment@lists.oasis-open.org \
    --cc=virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org \
    --cc=xmarcalx@amazon.co.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox