Re: [virtio-dev] Re: [virtio-comment] Re: [VIRTIO PCI PATCH v5 1/1] transport-pci: Add freeze_mode to virtio_pci_common_cfg

Chen, Jiqian
2023-09-20T07:53:40Z

Hi Lingshan,
Please reply to your own email thread, below are not related to my patches. Thanks a lot.

On 2023/9/20 15:47, Zhu, Lingshan wrote:
>
>
> On 9/20/2023 3:35 PM, Parav Pandit wrote:
>>> From: Zhu, Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@intel.com>
>>> Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2023 1:00 PM
>>>
>>> On 9/20/2023 3:24 PM, Chen, Jiqian wrote:
>>>> Hi Lingshan,
>>>> It seems you reply to the wrong email thread. They are not related to my
>>> patch.
>>> These reply to Parva's comments.
>>> @Parva, if you want to discuss more about live migration, please reply in my
>>> thread, lets don't flood here.
>> You made the point that "this is not live migration".
>> I am not discussing live migration in this thread.
>>
>> I replied for the point that device restoration from suspend for physical and hypevisor based device is not a 40nsec worth of work to restore by just doing a register write.
>> This is not live or device migration. This is restoring the device context initiated by the driver owning the device.
> restore the device context should be done by the hypervisor before setting DRIVER_OK and waking up the guest, not a concern here, out of spec
>

--
Best regards,
Jiqian Chen.