public inbox for virtio-dev@lists.linux.dev
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Zhu, Lingshan" <lingshan.zhu@intel.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: mst@redhat.com, eperezma@redhat.com, cohuck@redhat.com,
	virtio-comment@lists.oasis-open.org,
	virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [virtio-dev] Re: [RFC PATCH 1/5] virtio: introduce SUSPEND bit in device status
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2023 10:17:17 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2d0d78ed-fd2b-fe74-05b2-15abf0441e72@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACGkMEte7KEi6XS17HFTa=xLSuA2NA5XDUUevJuieNZ00k5+gg@mail.gmail.com>



On 8/16/2023 9:58 AM, Jason Wang wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 6:48 PM Zhu, Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@intel.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 8/15/2023 8:37 AM, Jason Wang wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 8:26 AM Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 7:29 PM Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@intel.com> wrote:
>>>>> This patch introudces a new status bit in the device status: SUSPEND.
>>>>>
>>>>> This SUSPEND bit can be used by the driver to suspend a device,
>>>>> in order to stablize the device states and virtqueue states.
>>>>>
>>>>> Its main use case is live migration.
>>>> I think patch 3 needs to be squashed into this one.
>> Patch 3 mentions Virtqueue State that is introduced in patch 2,
> Ok, so let's reorder the let patch 2 come first.
OK, I can work on that

Thanks
>
> Thanks
>
>> so I think patch 3 should placed after patch 2.
>>
>> Thanks
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Eugenio PÃrez <eperezma@redhat.com>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@intel.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>    content.tex | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>    1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/content.tex b/content.tex
>>>>> index 0a62dce..1bb4401 100644
>>>>> --- a/content.tex
>>>>> +++ b/content.tex
>>>>> @@ -47,6 +47,9 @@ \section{\field{Device Status} Field}\label{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Dev
>>>>>    \item[DRIVER_OK (4)] Indicates that the driver is set up and ready to
>>>>>      drive the device.
>>>>>
>>>>> +\item[SUSPEND (16)] When VIRTIO_F_SUSPEND is negotiated, indicates that the
>>>>> +  device has been suspended by the driver.
>>>>> +
>>>>>    \item[DEVICE_NEEDS_RESET (64)] Indicates that the device has experienced
>>>>>      an error from which it can't recover.
>>>>>    \end{description}
>>>>> @@ -73,6 +76,10 @@ \section{\field{Device Status} Field}\label{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Dev
>>>>>    recover by issuing a reset.
>>>>>    \end{note}
>>>>>
>>>>> +The driver MUST NOT set SUSPEND if FEATURES_OK is not set.
>>>>> +
>>>>> +When set SUSPEND, the driver MUST re-read \field{device status} to ensure the SUSPEND bit is set.
>>>>> +
>>>>>    \devicenormative{\subsection}{Device Status Field}{Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Device Status Field}
>>>>>
>>>>>    The device MUST NOT consume buffers or send any used buffer
>>>>> @@ -82,6 +89,13 @@ \section{\field{Device Status} Field}\label{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Dev
>>>>>    that a reset is needed.  If DRIVER_OK is set, after it sets DEVICE_NEEDS_RESET, the device
>>>>>    MUST send a device configuration change notification to the driver.
>>>>>
>>>>> +The device MUST ignore SUSPEND if FEATURES_OK is not set.
>>>> Is there any value to allow SUSPEND to be set without DRIVER_OK?
>> If live migration happens when the guest initializing the device,
>> maybe the guest driver has already configured some virtqueues or
>> modified the config space. At that point, We should allow to suspend
>> the device, because the hypervisor should not reset the device at
>> that moment.
>>
>> SUSPEND requires FEATURES_OK because VIRTIO_F_SUSPEND has to be negotiated.
>>>>> +
>>>>> +The deivce MUST ignore SUSPEND if VIRTIO_F_SUSPEND is not negotiated.
>>>> typo.
>> Yes
>>>> Thanks
>>> Btw, it's not clear to me if driver is allowed to clear this bit.
>> Patch 1 mentions that DRIVER_OK clears SUSPEND, so that the driver
>> can resume the device if LM fails.
>>
>> Thanks
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>>>> +
>>>>> +If VIRTIO_F_SUSPEND is negotiated and SUSPEND is set, the device MUST clear SUSPEND
>>>>> +and resumes operation upon DRIVER_OK.
>>>>> +
>>>>>    \section{Feature Bits}\label{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Feature Bits}
>>>>>
>>>>>    Each virtio device offers all the features it understands.  During
>>>>> @@ -872,6 +886,10 @@ \chapter{Reserved Feature Bits}\label{sec:Reserved Feature Bits}
>>>>>           \ref{devicenormative:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Feature Bits} for
>>>>>           handling features reserved for future use.
>>>>>
>>>>> +  \item[VIRTIO_F_SUSPEND(41)] This feature indicates that the driver can
>>>>> +   SUSPEND the device.
>>>>> +   See \ref{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Device Status Field}.
>>>>> +
>>>>>    \end{description}
>>>>>
>>>>>    \drivernormative{\section}{Reserved Feature Bits}{Reserved Feature Bits}
>>>>> --
>>>>> 2.35.3
>>>>>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-help@lists.oasis-open.org


  reply	other threads:[~2023-08-16  2:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-14 19:28 [virtio-dev] [RFC PATCH 0/5] virtio: introduce SUSPEND bit and vq state Zhu Lingshan
2023-08-14 14:20 ` [virtio-dev] Re: [virtio-comment] " Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-08-14 15:47 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-08-15  1:38   ` Jason Wang
2023-08-15 10:14     ` Zhu, Lingshan
2023-08-14 19:29 ` [virtio-dev] [RFC PATCH 1/5] virtio: introduce SUSPEND bit in device status Zhu Lingshan
2023-08-14 14:30   ` [virtio-dev] Re: [virtio-comment] " Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-08-15 10:31     ` Zhu, Lingshan
2023-08-15 12:29       ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-08-17 15:15         ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2023-08-17 16:04           ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-08-18  9:55             ` Zhu, Lingshan
2023-08-21 13:45               ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-08-15  0:26   ` [virtio-dev] " Jason Wang
2023-08-15  0:37     ` Jason Wang
2023-08-15 10:48       ` Zhu, Lingshan
2023-08-16  1:58         ` Jason Wang
2023-08-16  2:17           ` Zhu, Lingshan [this message]
2023-08-15 10:50       ` Zhu, Lingshan
2023-08-16  2:05         ` [virtio-dev] Re: [virtio-comment] " Jason Wang
2023-08-16  2:20           ` Zhu, Lingshan
2023-08-14 19:29 ` [virtio-dev] [RFC PATCH 2/5] virtio: introduce vq state as basic facility Zhu Lingshan
2023-08-14 14:49   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-08-15 10:53     ` Zhu, Lingshan
2023-08-14 19:29 ` [virtio-dev] [RFC PATCH 3/5] virtio: The actions by the device upon SUSPEND Zhu Lingshan
2023-08-14 15:00   ` [virtio-dev] Re: [virtio-comment] " Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-08-15 11:07     ` Zhu, Lingshan
2023-08-15 12:33       ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-08-16  4:25         ` Zhu, Lingshan
2023-08-16 12:33           ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-08-15  0:29   ` [virtio-dev] " Jason Wang
2023-08-15 11:16     ` Zhu, Lingshan
2023-08-16  2:10       ` Jason Wang
2023-08-16  4:53         ` Zhu, Lingshan
2023-08-14 19:29 ` [virtio-dev] [RFC PATCH 4/5] virtqueue: constraints for virtqueue state Zhu Lingshan
2023-08-14 15:15   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-08-15 11:18     ` Zhu, Lingshan
2023-08-15  0:34   ` [virtio-dev] " Jason Wang
2023-08-15 11:30     ` Zhu, Lingshan
2023-08-16  2:11       ` Jason Wang
2023-08-16  5:07         ` Zhu, Lingshan
     [not found]       ` <SN6PR11MB3517EF23D99CE4FDA8DDB22DFF1AA@SN6PR11MB3517.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
2023-08-17  8:42         ` [virtio-dev] Re: [virtio-comment] " Zhu, Lingshan
2023-08-21  4:03           ` Jason Wang
2023-08-17 15:19       ` [virtio-dev] " Eugenio Perez Martin
2023-08-18  9:44         ` Zhu, Lingshan
2023-08-21  9:26           ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2023-08-21 10:32             ` [virtio-dev] Re: [virtio-comment] " Zhu, Lingshan
2023-09-05  9:08             ` Zhu, Lingshan
2023-09-07  8:09               ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2023-09-07  9:34                 ` Zhu, Lingshan
2023-09-08  6:23                   ` Si-Wei Liu
2023-09-08  8:41                     ` Zhu, Lingshan
2023-08-14 19:29 ` [virtio-dev] [RFC PATCH 5/5] virtio-pci: implement VIRTIO_F_QUEUE_STATE Zhu Lingshan
2023-08-14 15:18   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-08-15 11:31     ` [virtio-dev] Re: [virtio-comment] " Zhu, Lingshan
2023-08-15  0:35   ` [virtio-dev] " Jason Wang
2023-08-15 11:31     ` Zhu, Lingshan
2023-08-17  3:04 ` [virtio-dev] Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] virtio: introduce SUSPEND bit and vq state Zhu, Lingshan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2d0d78ed-fd2b-fe74-05b2-15abf0441e72@intel.com \
    --to=lingshan.zhu@intel.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=virtio-comment@lists.oasis-open.org \
    --cc=virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox