From: "Zhu, Lingshan" <lingshan.zhu@intel.com>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Cc: jasowang@redhat.com, mst@redhat.com, eperezma@redhat.com,
cohuck@redhat.com, virtio-comment@lists.oasis-open.org,
virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [virtio-dev] Re: [virtio-comment] [RFC PATCH 1/5] virtio: introduce SUSPEND bit in device status
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2023 18:31:23 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56c6411d-2ee9-f2c2-4da7-8d708f7729a2@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230814143039.GD3146793@fedora>
On 8/14/2023 10:30 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 03:29:00AM +0800, Zhu Lingshan wrote:
>> This patch introudces a new status bit in the device status: SUSPEND.
>>
>> This SUSPEND bit can be used by the driver to suspend a device,
>> in order to stablize the device states and virtqueue states.
>>
>> Its main use case is live migration.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Eugenio PÃrez <eperezma@redhat.com>
> There is an character encoding issue in Eugenio's surname.
Oh, I copied his SOB form his email, I will copy from git log to fix this,
thanks for point out it.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@intel.com>
>> ---
>> content.tex | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
> This patch hints at the asynchronous nature of the SUSPEND bit (the
> driver must re-read the Device Status Field) but doesn't explain the
> rationale or any limits.
>
> For example, is there a timeout or should the driver re-read the Device
> Status Field forever?
It depends on the driver, normally we expect this operation can be done
successfully
like how the driver/device handles FEATURES_OK.
Once failed due to:
1) driver timeout, the driver can reset the device
2) device failure, the device can set NEEDS_RESET.
>
> Does the driver need to re-read the Device Status Field after clearing
> the SUSPEND bit?
I think the driver should re-read, I will add this in the next version.
>
>> diff --git a/content.tex b/content.tex
>> index 0a62dce..1bb4401 100644
>> --- a/content.tex
>> +++ b/content.tex
>> @@ -47,6 +47,9 @@ \section{\field{Device Status} Field}\label{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Dev
>> \item[DRIVER_OK (4)] Indicates that the driver is set up and ready to
>> drive the device.
>>
>> +\item[SUSPEND (16)] When VIRTIO_F_SUSPEND is negotiated, indicates that the
>> + device has been suspended by the driver.
>> +
>> \item[DEVICE_NEEDS_RESET (64)] Indicates that the device has experienced
>> an error from which it can't recover.
>> \end{description}
>> @@ -73,6 +76,10 @@ \section{\field{Device Status} Field}\label{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Dev
>> recover by issuing a reset.
>> \end{note}
>>
>> +The driver MUST NOT set SUSPEND if FEATURES_OK is not set.
>> +
>> +When set SUSPEND, the driver MUST re-read \field{device status} to ensure the SUSPEND bit is set.
> "When setting SUSPEND, ..." would be grammatically correct. Another
> option is "After setting the SUSPEND bit, ...".
Will fix in the next version.
>
>> +
>> \devicenormative{\subsection}{Device Status Field}{Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Device Status Field}
>>
>> The device MUST NOT consume buffers or send any used buffer
>> @@ -82,6 +89,13 @@ \section{\field{Device Status} Field}\label{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Dev
>> that a reset is needed. If DRIVER_OK is set, after it sets DEVICE_NEEDS_RESET, the device
>> MUST send a device configuration change notification to the driver.
>>
>> +The device MUST ignore SUSPEND if FEATURES_OK is not set.
>> +
>> +The deivce MUST ignore SUSPEND if VIRTIO_F_SUSPEND is not negotiated.
>> +
>> +If VIRTIO_F_SUSPEND is negotiated and SUSPEND is set, the device MUST clear SUSPEND
>> +and resumes operation upon DRIVER_OK.
> I can't parse this sentence. If the driver writes SUSPEND | DRIVER_OK |
> ... to the Device Status Field, then the device accepts DRIVER_OK and
> clears SUSPEND?
>
> Why?
I expect DRIVER_OK can clear SUSPEND, so that the device can resume running
in case of a failed live migration.
Maybe I should say: DRIVER_OK clears SUSPEND, and if DRIVER_OK is set to
a suspended device, the device should resume operation
Thanks
>
>> +
>> \section{Feature Bits}\label{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Feature Bits}
>>
>> Each virtio device offers all the features it understands. During
>> @@ -872,6 +886,10 @@ \chapter{Reserved Feature Bits}\label{sec:Reserved Feature Bits}
>> \ref{devicenormative:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Feature Bits} for
>> handling features reserved for future use.
>>
>> + \item[VIRTIO_F_SUSPEND(41)] This feature indicates that the driver can
>> + SUSPEND the device.
>> + See \ref{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Device Status Field}.
>> +
>> \end{description}
>>
>> \drivernormative{\section}{Reserved Feature Bits}{Reserved Feature Bits}
>> --
>> 2.35.3
>>
>>
>> This publicly archived list offers a means to provide input to the
>> OASIS Virtual I/O Device (VIRTIO) TC.
>>
>> In order to verify user consent to the Feedback License terms and
>> to minimize spam in the list archive, subscription is required
>> before posting.
>>
>> Subscribe: virtio-comment-subscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
>> Unsubscribe: virtio-comment-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
>> List help: virtio-comment-help@lists.oasis-open.org
>> List archive: https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-comment/
>> Feedback License: https://www.oasis-open.org/who/ipr/feedback_license.pdf
>> List Guidelines: https://www.oasis-open.org/policies-guidelines/mailing-lists
>> Committee: https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/virtio/
>> Join OASIS: https://www.oasis-open.org/join/
>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-help@lists.oasis-open.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-15 10:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-14 19:28 [virtio-dev] [RFC PATCH 0/5] virtio: introduce SUSPEND bit and vq state Zhu Lingshan
2023-08-14 14:20 ` [virtio-dev] Re: [virtio-comment] " Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-08-14 15:47 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-08-15 1:38 ` Jason Wang
2023-08-15 10:14 ` Zhu, Lingshan
2023-08-14 19:29 ` [virtio-dev] [RFC PATCH 1/5] virtio: introduce SUSPEND bit in device status Zhu Lingshan
2023-08-14 14:30 ` [virtio-dev] Re: [virtio-comment] " Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-08-15 10:31 ` Zhu, Lingshan [this message]
2023-08-15 12:29 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-08-17 15:15 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2023-08-17 16:04 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-08-18 9:55 ` Zhu, Lingshan
2023-08-21 13:45 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-08-15 0:26 ` [virtio-dev] " Jason Wang
2023-08-15 0:37 ` Jason Wang
2023-08-15 10:48 ` Zhu, Lingshan
2023-08-16 1:58 ` Jason Wang
2023-08-16 2:17 ` Zhu, Lingshan
2023-08-15 10:50 ` Zhu, Lingshan
2023-08-16 2:05 ` [virtio-dev] Re: [virtio-comment] " Jason Wang
2023-08-16 2:20 ` Zhu, Lingshan
2023-08-14 19:29 ` [virtio-dev] [RFC PATCH 2/5] virtio: introduce vq state as basic facility Zhu Lingshan
2023-08-14 14:49 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-08-15 10:53 ` Zhu, Lingshan
2023-08-14 19:29 ` [virtio-dev] [RFC PATCH 3/5] virtio: The actions by the device upon SUSPEND Zhu Lingshan
2023-08-14 15:00 ` [virtio-dev] Re: [virtio-comment] " Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-08-15 11:07 ` Zhu, Lingshan
2023-08-15 12:33 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-08-16 4:25 ` Zhu, Lingshan
2023-08-16 12:33 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-08-15 0:29 ` [virtio-dev] " Jason Wang
2023-08-15 11:16 ` Zhu, Lingshan
2023-08-16 2:10 ` Jason Wang
2023-08-16 4:53 ` Zhu, Lingshan
2023-08-14 19:29 ` [virtio-dev] [RFC PATCH 4/5] virtqueue: constraints for virtqueue state Zhu Lingshan
2023-08-14 15:15 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-08-15 11:18 ` Zhu, Lingshan
2023-08-15 0:34 ` [virtio-dev] " Jason Wang
2023-08-15 11:30 ` Zhu, Lingshan
2023-08-16 2:11 ` Jason Wang
2023-08-16 5:07 ` Zhu, Lingshan
[not found] ` <SN6PR11MB3517EF23D99CE4FDA8DDB22DFF1AA@SN6PR11MB3517.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
2023-08-17 8:42 ` [virtio-dev] Re: [virtio-comment] " Zhu, Lingshan
2023-08-21 4:03 ` Jason Wang
2023-08-17 15:19 ` [virtio-dev] " Eugenio Perez Martin
2023-08-18 9:44 ` Zhu, Lingshan
2023-08-21 9:26 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2023-08-21 10:32 ` [virtio-dev] Re: [virtio-comment] " Zhu, Lingshan
2023-09-05 9:08 ` Zhu, Lingshan
2023-09-07 8:09 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2023-09-07 9:34 ` Zhu, Lingshan
2023-09-08 6:23 ` Si-Wei Liu
2023-09-08 8:41 ` Zhu, Lingshan
2023-08-14 19:29 ` [virtio-dev] [RFC PATCH 5/5] virtio-pci: implement VIRTIO_F_QUEUE_STATE Zhu Lingshan
2023-08-14 15:18 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-08-15 11:31 ` [virtio-dev] Re: [virtio-comment] " Zhu, Lingshan
2023-08-15 0:35 ` [virtio-dev] " Jason Wang
2023-08-15 11:31 ` Zhu, Lingshan
2023-08-17 3:04 ` [virtio-dev] Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] virtio: introduce SUSPEND bit and vq state Zhu, Lingshan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56c6411d-2ee9-f2c2-4da7-8d708f7729a2@intel.com \
--to=lingshan.zhu@intel.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=virtio-comment@lists.oasis-open.org \
--cc=virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox