Re: [virtio-dev] Re: queue_reset register polarity to improve

[Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>]

On Sun, Apr 24 2022, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> wrote:

> On Sun, Apr 24, 2022 at 12:49:19AM +0000, Parav Pandit wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> A recently defined queue_reset register has a little weird definition that we should improve.
>> When driver initiate queue reset, it writes queue_reset = 1.
>> When device is busy resetting the queue, on this driver request, it is expected to return queue_reset=0.
>> Once queue reset is completed it is expected to return queue_reset = 1.
>> (Polarity changed twice to same value as what was driver set). See more below.
>> 
>> So state wise,
>> # q_enable, q_reset represents :
>> a) 0,0 -> device init time value
>> b) 1,0 -> vq is enabled and working
>> c) 1,1 -> vq is enabled, driver initiated reset
>> d) 1,0 -> vq is enabled, but device is busy doing the reset (conflicting definition with above #b )
> it is not great but don't see a conflict here
>
>> e) 0,1 -> vq reset is complete in the device and VQ is now disabled (again conflict with #a above )
> this one is ugly in that state is really mostly same as (1)
> but the flag values are different
>
>
>> f) 1,0 -> vq is enabled and working again
>
>
>
> It can actually be any value, the spec just says
>
> If VIRTIO_F_RING_RESET has been negotiated, after the driver writes 1 to
> \field{QueueReset} to reset the queue, it MUST verify that the queue
> has been reset by reading back \field{QueueReset} and ensuring that it
> is 1.
>
> So can be 2 or whatever, so one can distinguish between the two states.
>
> Spec really should clarify what to do if it is not 1 (i.e. read it again
> until it is 1) .
>
>
>> Instead, I think we should have below better, consistent definition, no matter how queue reset occurs (init time or later).
>> 
>> q_enable, q_reset
>> A) 0, 0 -> default, device init time
>> B) 1, 0 -> driver has enabled vq
>> C) 1, 1 -> driver started q reset
>> D) 1, 1 -> q_reset stays 1 until device is busy resetting vq (communicating that its working on resetting, consistent with #C)
>> E) 0, 0 -> q_reset by device is completed, q got disabled (now matches the state same as device init time #A)
>> 
>> Parav
>
>
> Well it's been merged since November. Probably too late unless you can
> convince the TC that the current feature should be abandoned
> and the feature completely redesigned. Above does not look like
> a deal breaker.

Agreed. We can add clarifications on top, though.

>
> If we are to re-design it, I would maybe instead rework things so queue_enable can be
> written to, to stop vq without a reset. Will need careful work for
> transports other than PCI since those already allow writing into e.g.
> QueueReady.

For ccw, we have not yet added queue reset; but looking at the spec, I
notice that the queue discovery section could also benefit from some
clarifications as it stands (do we need to specify special semantics for
SET_VQ with 0? do we need to forbid interactions with the queues when
SET_VQ has succeeded, but we have not yet set up indicators? etc.)


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-help@lists.oasis-open.org