From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <svaddagi@qti.qualcomm.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: "jasowang@redhat.com" <jasowang@redhat.com>,
"virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org"
<virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org>,
Trilok Soni <tsoni@quicinc.com>,
Pratik Patel <pratikp@quicinc.com>
Subject: Re: [virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH v1] virtio-mmio: Specify wait needed in driver during reset
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 17:21:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <875ywt2lit.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BY5PR02MB70731E359EB50CD2E3827239F9E99@BY5PR02MB7073.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
On Tue, Jul 27 2021, Srivatsa Vaddagiri <svaddagi@qti.qualcomm.com> wrote:
>> > > What about resets before FEATURES_OK? How are these handled?
>> >
>> > From device perspective, it's reset logic will always be same, independent of
>> > when reset was performed by driver (before or after feature negotiation). A
>> > driver that does not wait for reset completion will see undefined behavior
>> > after
>> > reset until it discovers that feature negotiation has failed?
>>
>> Hmm. that doesn't sound too good. Makes using
>> feature negotiation for this kind of useless ...
>> Device can actually detect a read from status, right?
>> Maybe if it sees status was not read it can just
>> stay in reset state and not exit it?
>
> Thinking on those lines, I am wondering if we can avoid the feature bit
> all together based on that logic.
>
> 1) Driver writes 0 to status register - device initiates reset sequence
> 2) Driver reads status - return 0x40 (VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_NEEDS_RESET)
> if reset sequence is in progress, otherwise return 0
I don't think we can have the device return NEEDS_RESET in that case;
that status is supposed to indicate "that the device has experienced an
error from which it can’t recover" -- which is not the case here,
especially since the driver has already initiated a reset.
> 3) Driver writes status (ACKNOWLEDGE Bit) - if this happened before reset
> sequence completed and before we returned 0 for status read, then reject
> further initialization by setting VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_NEEDS_RESET (until next
> reset that is)
>
> This should let device detect if we have a driver polling on reset completion or
> not?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-help@lists.oasis-open.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-29 15:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-23 14:55 [PATCH v1] virtio-mmio: Specify wait needed in driver during reset Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2021-07-26 11:03 ` [virtio-dev] " Cornelia Huck
2021-07-26 11:25 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2021-07-26 11:36 ` [virtio-dev] " Cornelia Huck
2021-07-26 13:19 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-07-26 14:09 ` [virtio-dev] " Cornelia Huck
2021-07-26 14:17 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2021-07-26 19:03 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-07-27 9:52 ` [virtio-dev] " Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2021-07-29 15:21 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2021-07-30 3:49 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2021-08-02 6:06 ` Jason Wang
2021-08-11 10:05 ` [virtio-dev] " Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2021-08-16 2:09 ` Jason Wang
2021-08-16 5:35 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
[not found] ` <20210816063550.GD5604@quicinc.com>
2021-08-16 11:48 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-08-16 13:34 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2021-08-16 14:37 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-08-16 14:58 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2021-08-17 5:45 ` Jason Wang
2021-08-17 7:51 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-08-17 8:15 ` Jason Wang
2021-08-17 10:03 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2021-08-17 12:48 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2021-08-18 2:57 ` Jason Wang
2021-08-18 2:54 ` Jason Wang
2021-08-18 5:15 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2021-08-18 5:40 ` Jason Wang
2021-08-18 5:51 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2021-08-18 6:04 ` Jason Wang
2021-08-18 6:13 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2021-08-24 16:57 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2021-08-20 3:56 ` Jason Wang
2021-08-20 11:15 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-07-26 13:18 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-07-26 14:13 ` [virtio-dev] " Cornelia Huck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=875ywt2lit.fsf@redhat.com \
--to=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pratikp@quicinc.com \
--cc=svaddagi@qti.qualcomm.com \
--cc=tsoni@quicinc.com \
--cc=virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox