From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>,
virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org
Cc: mst@redhat.com, stefanha@redhat.com,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
Subject: [virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH v2] content: Remove duplicate paragraph
Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2021 11:00:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <878rz5yzu7.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211006112816.71892-1-jean-philippe@linaro.org>
On Wed, Oct 06 2021, Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org> wrote:
> It looks like commit 356aeeb40d7a ("content: add vendor specific cfg
> type") had a merge issue. It includes the device normative paragraph for
> Shared memory capability, which was already added right above it by
> commit 855ad7af2bd6 ("shared memory: Define PCI capability").
>
> The two paragraphs differ, and the first paragraph is correct. It refers
> to struct virtio_pci_cap64 which embeds struct virtio_pci_cap:
>
> struct virtio_pci_cap64 {
> struct virtio_pci_cap {
> ...
> le32 offset;
> le32 length;
> } cap;
> u32 offset_hi;
> u32 length_hi;
> }
>
> Merge the two paragraph while keeping the best of both. Drop the spaces
> after \field to stay consistent with the rest of the document.
>
> Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
> ---
> v1: https://www.mail-archive.com/virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org/msg07815.html
> ---
> content.tex | 15 ++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
Thanks, pushed as an editorial update.
[While looking at this, I noticed that the normative statements for the
vendor data capability are not at the correct level. I'll do a patch to
fix that.]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-help@lists.oasis-open.org
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-07 9:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-06 11:28 [PATCH v2] content: Remove duplicate paragraph Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-10-07 8:41 ` [virtio-dev] " Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-10-07 8:43 ` [virtio-dev] " Cornelia Huck
2021-10-07 9:00 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=878rz5yzu7.fsf@redhat.com \
--to=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox