From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
virtio-comment@lists.oasis-open.org,
virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org, virtio@lists.oasis-open.org,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [virtio-comment] Re: [virtio] [PATCH] virtio: clarify feature negotiation
Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2022 16:28:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87lewharyk.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YfET8pNaYoWZ6eFt@myrica>
[sorry about resurrecting an undead thread; I'm trying to collect some
editorial changes]
On Wed, Jan 26 2022, Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 04:42:35PM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> So from that point of view, we are actually relaxing the requirements,
>> and yes we'll need to carefully go over each instance of
>> "offered".
>> I thought I did, but now I did a quick grep again and I found instances
>> in virtio-iommu.tex and virtio-gpio.tex
>> Both of these are new, so I think we can just fix them to "negotiated".
>>
>> Jean-Philippe, Viresh, what do you think? Would it be a problem to
>> replace offered with negotiated, and restrict iommu and gpio drivers to
>> access config space after FEATURES_OK?
>
> No problem for iommu. The config space fields domain_range and input_range
> are not useful to the driver before DRIVER_OK. Reading field bypass
> earlier could be useful for debugging, but in that case going a few more
> steps into device initialization wouldn't hurt.
For domain_range and input_range, offered->negotiated looks like the
right thing to do. However, I'm a bit unsure about bypass. We currently
have:
"
An endpoint is in bypass mode if:
\begin{itemize}
\item the VIRTIO_IOMMU_F_BYPASS_CONFIG feature is offered and:
\begin{itemize}
\item config field \field{bypass} is 1 and the endpoint is
not attached to a domain. This applies even if the driver
does not accept the VIRTIO_IOMMU_F_BYPASS_CONFIG feature
and the device initializes field \field{bypass} to 1.
or
\item the endpoint is attached to a domain with
VIRTIO_IOMMU_ATTACH_F_BYPASS.
\end{itemize}
"
The "This applies even if..." clause refers to "offered, but not
accepted". I assume we want to do offered->negotiated even here, but
wanted to double-check.
This publicly archived list offers a means to provide input to the
OASIS Virtual I/O Device (VIRTIO) TC.
In order to verify user consent to the Feedback License terms and
to minimize spam in the list archive, subscription is required
before posting.
Subscribe: virtio-comment-subscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
Unsubscribe: virtio-comment-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
List help: virtio-comment-help@lists.oasis-open.org
List archive: https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-comment/
Feedback License: https://www.oasis-open.org/who/ipr/feedback_license.pdf
List Guidelines: https://www.oasis-open.org/policies-guidelines/mailing-lists
Committee: https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/virtio/
Join OASIS: https://www.oasis-open.org/join/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-07 14:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-14 22:50 [virtio-dev] [PATCH] virtio: clarify feature negotiation Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-01-17 15:39 ` Cornelia Huck
2022-01-17 22:26 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-01-19 12:23 ` Halil Pasic
2022-01-19 16:20 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-01-19 17:50 ` [virtio] " Cornelia Huck
2022-01-19 23:48 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-01-20 12:39 ` [virtio-comment] " Cornelia Huck
2022-01-20 15:07 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-01-20 15:24 ` Halil Pasic
2022-01-19 12:23 ` [virtio-comment] Re: [virtio] " Halil Pasic
2022-01-19 16:34 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-01-20 13:05 ` [virtio-dev] " Cornelia Huck
2022-01-20 16:52 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-01-21 2:38 ` Halil Pasic
2022-01-21 16:05 ` [virtio-dev] " Cornelia Huck
2022-01-24 16:40 ` Halil Pasic
2022-01-24 21:42 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-01-25 14:57 ` [virtio] " Cornelia Huck
2022-01-25 18:05 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-01-26 9:27 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2022-04-07 14:28 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2022-04-07 14:58 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-01-26 15:10 ` Halil Pasic
2022-01-25 15:22 ` [virtio-dev] " Cornelia Huck
2022-01-26 14:14 ` Halil Pasic
2022-01-21 3:17 ` Halil Pasic
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87lewharyk.fsf@redhat.com \
--to=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=virtio-comment@lists.oasis-open.org \
--cc=virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org \
--cc=virtio@lists.oasis-open.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox