From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>,
virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org, jasowang@redhat.com,
Parav Pandit <parav@nvidia.com>
Subject: [virtio-dev] 1.3 and branching (was: [virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH v12] virtio-net: support device stats)
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2023 14:24:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87mszp8nae.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230712082616-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
On Wed, Jul 12 2023, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 02:24:32PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 12 2023, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
>> > Yes we were supposed to freeze for 1.3. This change can be merged on a
>> > main branch after 1.3 forks and is under review.
>>
>> Nod, that's what I would prefer to do. Being merged on virtio-next
>> should be enough for including device/driver implementations.
>
> Except I'd prefer a v1.3 branch instead of a next branch - adding things
> on the branch should be harder, not easier.
Just to clarify: What I had planned for 1.3 (and what we already did for
1.2) is to fork a -next branch, finish 1.3 on the master branch, and
then merge -next back into master after we'd be done with 1.3.
I'm not sure what you mean by "adding things on the branch should be
harder, not easier" -- I think it is already a bit harder because it is
a branch :)
We can of course do a v1.3 branch instead and continue developing on
master, but shouldn't we then create branches (glorified tags) for the
older releases as well?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-help@lists.oasis-open.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-21 12:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-15 3:24 [virtio-dev] [PATCH v12] virtio-net: support device stats Xuan Zhuo
2022-03-22 7:57 ` [virtio-dev] " Jason Wang
2023-07-10 7:28 ` [virtio-dev] " Xuan Zhuo
2023-07-12 8:08 ` Jason Wang
2023-07-12 9:11 ` Xuan Zhuo
2023-07-13 2:21 ` Jason Wang
2023-07-13 2:27 ` [virtio-dev] Re: [virtio-comment] " Xuan Zhuo
2023-07-12 11:34 ` [virtio-dev] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-07-12 11:44 ` Xuan Zhuo
2023-07-12 11:54 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-07-12 12:24 ` Cornelia Huck
2023-07-12 12:33 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-07-21 12:24 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2023-07-21 12:41 ` [virtio-dev] Re: 1.3 and branching (was: [virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH v12] virtio-net: support device stats) Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-07-21 13:05 ` [virtio-dev] Re: 1.3 and branching Cornelia Huck
2023-07-21 14:13 ` [virtio-dev] RE: 1.3 and branching (was: [virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH v12] virtio-net: support device stats) Parav Pandit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87mszp8nae.fsf@redhat.com \
--to=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=parav@nvidia.com \
--cc=virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org \
--cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox