From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: virtio@lists.oasis-open.org, virtio-comment@lists.oasis-open.org,
virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [virtio-dev] Re: [virtio-comment] [RFC] virtio 1.3 schedule
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 18:16:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87r0spjct2.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230407071926-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
On Fri, Apr 07 2023, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 05, 2023 at 03:57:09PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
>> That said, let me propose the following timeline:
>>
>> - July 1st 2023: enter feature freeze; all proposed changes must at
>> least have an open github issue that refers to a proposal on-list
>> - August 1st 2023: enter change freeze; everything needs to have been
>> voted upon (i.e. we can start with preparations for a release like
>> compiling the change log)
>> - at the same time, fork virtio-next, which can be used for development
>> while we're working on the release
>> - August/September 2023: prepare draft, initiate initial voting etc.
>
> Hmm looks like you forgot a 30 day the public review period (or is that
> included in the "etc"? ). During this period we will likely receive
> review comments which we have to address. Should the changes turn out to
> be material, another public review period will be required.
> Let's spell it out please.
Yeah, that's what I meant with "etc"... let's make this:
- August 2023: prepare draft, aim to have it ready and voted upon by
August 31 the latest (preferrably earlier)
- September 2023: public review period (30 days)
- October 2023: another public review period, if needed; otherwise, get
comittee specification ready and voted upon
- October (maybe November, if we're running late) 2023: virtio 1.3
released
The most important dates are feature freeze on Jul 1 and change freeze
on Aug 1, I guess; for the rest, we depend on whether people are out on
PTO, which kind of feedback we get, etc. -- but as long as we release
1.3 in 2023, I'll be happy enough.
>
>
>
>> - by September/October 2023: have the final 1.3 spec ready, voted upon,
>> and released
>> - virtio-next can be merged into mainline, and we continue with business
>> as usual
>>
>> Thoughts? We might want to move things a tad earlier, but I don't think
>> we should push the schedule out much further.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-help@lists.oasis-open.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-12 16:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-05 13:57 [virtio-dev] [RFC] virtio 1.3 schedule Cornelia Huck
2023-04-05 14:05 ` [virtio-dev] RE: [virtio-comment] " Parav Pandit
2023-04-05 19:23 ` [virtio-dev] Re: [virtio] " Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-04-07 11:24 ` [virtio-dev] Re: [virtio-comment] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-04-12 16:16 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2023-06-29 17:41 ` [virtio-dev] " Parav Pandit
2023-06-29 19:35 ` [virtio-dev] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-06-30 8:47 ` Cornelia Huck
2023-06-30 8:55 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-06-30 11:14 ` [virtio-dev] " Parav Pandit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87r0spjct2.fsf@redhat.com \
--to=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=virtio-comment@lists.oasis-open.org \
--cc=virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org \
--cc=virtio@lists.oasis-open.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox