From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: "Eugenio Pérez" <eperezma@redhat.com>,
virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org,
virtio-comment@lists.oasis-open.org, mst@redhat.com,
jasowang@redhat.com
Cc: amikheev@nvidia.com, stefanha@redhat.com, shahafs@nvidia.com,
oren@nvidia.com, pasic@linux.ibm.com, bodong@nvidia.com,
"Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>,
parav@nvidia.com, mgurtovoy@nvidia.com
Subject: [virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] content: Explain better the status clearing bits
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2021 11:34:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87sfw1oe5q.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211111185812.2326093-2-eperezma@redhat.com>
On Thu, Nov 11 2021, Eugenio Pérez <eperezma@redhat.com> wrote:
> The spec tells that "The driver MUST NOT clear a device status bit", but
> a device using PCI transport reset a virtio device writing 0 to device
I think MMIO uses that mechanism as well?
> status. In some way, that is to clear all its bits.
>
> Instead of add an exception, tell explicitely the status bits that
> the driver cannot clear anytime in a normal operation, so conformant
> device and drivers keeps being conformant.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eugenio Pérez <eperezma@redhat.com>
> ---
> content.tex | 7 ++++---
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/content.tex b/content.tex
> index 5d112af..2aa3006 100644
> --- a/content.tex
> +++ b/content.tex
> @@ -60,9 +60,10 @@ \section{\field{Device Status} Field}\label{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Dev
> initialization sequence specified in
> \ref{sec:General Initialization And Device Operation / Device
> Initialization}.
> -The driver MUST NOT clear a
> -\field{device status} bit. If the driver sets the FAILED bit,
> -the driver MUST later reset the device before attempting to re-initialize.
> +The driver MUST NOT clear ACKNOWLEDGE, DRIVER, DRIVER_OK, FEATURES_OK or
> +DEVICE_NEEDS_RESET bits of \field{device status}, except if resetting the whole
> +device. If the driver sets the FAILED bit, the driver MUST later reset the
> +device before attempting to re-initialize.
I think we need to distinguish "driver wants to clear a status bit" from
"driver is initiating a reset, and that transport implements that by
writing 0 to the device status". So, what about
"The driver MUST NOT clear a \field{device status} bit, except when
setting \field{device status} to 0 as a transport-specific way to
intitiate a reset."
If we introduce driver-clearable bits later, we can simply make that
"The driver MUST NOT clear a \field{device status} bit other than
NEW_BIT, ..."
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-help@lists.oasis-open.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-12 10:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-11 18:58 [PATCH v3 0/2] virtio: introduce STOP status bit Eugenio Pérez
2021-11-11 18:58 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] content: Explain better the status clearing bits Eugenio Pérez
2021-11-12 3:46 ` Jason Wang
2021-11-12 11:41 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2021-11-12 10:34 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2021-11-12 11:41 ` [virtio-dev] " Eugenio Perez Martin
2021-11-11 18:58 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] virtio: introduce STOP status bit Eugenio Pérez
2021-11-12 4:18 ` Jason Wang
2021-11-12 10:50 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2021-11-15 4:08 ` Jason Wang
2021-11-15 18:16 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2021-11-16 6:56 ` Jason Wang
2021-11-16 14:50 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2021-11-17 3:27 ` Jason Wang
2021-11-17 8:08 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2021-11-18 3:27 ` Jason Wang
2021-11-18 15:59 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-11-18 19:58 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2021-11-23 12:16 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-11-23 17:00 ` [virtio-dev] " Eugenio Perez Martin
2021-11-24 11:20 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-11-24 16:41 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2021-11-29 10:32 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-11-25 2:57 ` Jason Wang
2021-11-29 10:29 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-11-29 16:55 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2021-12-01 10:21 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-12-02 8:30 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2021-12-02 2:40 ` Jason Wang
2021-12-02 9:44 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-12-03 2:09 ` Jason Wang
2021-11-18 14:45 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] " Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-11-18 16:49 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2021-11-23 11:33 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-11-23 16:19 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2021-11-24 15:26 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-11-24 16:58 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2021-11-25 3:05 ` Jason Wang
2021-11-25 7:24 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2021-11-25 7:38 ` Jason Wang
2021-11-25 9:01 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2021-11-25 9:10 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
[not found] ` <CACGkMEvD+Z7cYszhMzBsnEaC0K0kfnHxzFDEfjT_qLOFiMR-XA@mail.gmail.com>
2021-11-26 8:26 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87sfw1oe5q.fsf@redhat.com \
--to=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=amikheev@nvidia.com \
--cc=bodong@nvidia.com \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=mgurtovoy@nvidia.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=oren@nvidia.com \
--cc=parav@nvidia.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=shahafs@nvidia.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=virtio-comment@lists.oasis-open.org \
--cc=virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox