Discussion of the implementations of VIRTIO specification
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org, jasowang@redhat.com
Subject: [virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] virtio: pci support virtqueue reset
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2021 18:33:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87tui349zu.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1632883462.8908377-1-xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>

On Wed, Sep 29 2021, Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 28 Sep 2021 12:20:46 +0200, Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 28 2021, Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>> > +The device MUST reset the queue when 1 is written to \field{queue_reset}, and
>> > +present a 1 in \field{queue_reset} after the queue has been reset, until the
>> > +driver re-enables the queue via \field{queue_enable}. (see \ref{sec:Virtqueues / Virtqueue Reset}).
>>
>> "...or the device is reset." ?
>>
>
>     The device MUST reset the queue when 1 is written to \field{queue_reset}, and
>     present a 1 in \field{queue_reset} after the queue has been reset, until the
>     driver re-enables the queue via \field{queue_enable} or the device is reset. (see \ref{sec:Virtqueues / Virtqueue Reset}).
>
> Is that so? Doesn't it feel necessary?

Is queue_reset supposed to persist across device reset? That feels a bit
odd to me.

>
>
>> Maybe also
>>
>> "The device MAY change the value of \field{queue_size} if the queue has
>> been reset." ?
>>
>> Should it always set that field to the currently maximum supported queue
>> size (assuming that can change dynamically)? Do we need some kind of
>> synchronization for those changes?
>
> When the queue is reset, all states of this queue MUST be modified to the
> initial value. For example, queue_size MUST be reset to the maximum value
> supported by the device. Because in the last reset queue or the entire device
> reset process, the driver will modify the queue_size of the device so that its
> value may be less than the maximum value.

I think the question is whether the device may choose a different
initial maximum value once the queue has been reset. If it does change
the value, there may be a race where the driver has reset the queue,
read queue_reset back, read the max queue size, and the device only then
changing the max queue size. Maybe I'm overthinking this.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-help@lists.oasis-open.org


  reply	other threads:[~2021-09-29 16:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-28  7:55 [PATCH v4 0/3] virtio: introduce VIRTIO_F_RING_RESET for reset queue Xuan Zhuo
2021-09-28  7:55 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] virtio: introduce virtqueue reset as basic facility Xuan Zhuo
2021-09-28 10:06   ` [virtio-dev] " Cornelia Huck
2021-09-29  2:01     ` Xuan Zhuo
2021-09-29  2:19       ` Jason Wang
2021-09-29 16:24         ` Cornelia Huck
2021-09-30  1:21           ` Jason Wang
2021-09-30 11:02             ` Cornelia Huck
2021-09-28  7:55 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] virtio: pci support virtqueue reset Xuan Zhuo
2021-09-28 10:20   ` [virtio-dev] " Cornelia Huck
2021-09-29  2:44     ` Xuan Zhuo
2021-09-29 16:33       ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2021-09-30  1:18         ` Jason Wang
2021-09-30 11:08           ` [virtio-dev] " Cornelia Huck
2021-10-11  2:42             ` Jason Wang
2021-09-28  7:55 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] virtio: mmio " Xuan Zhuo
2021-09-28 10:43   ` [virtio-dev] " Cornelia Huck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87tui349zu.fsf@redhat.com \
    --to=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org \
    --cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox