From: Parav Pandit <parav@nvidia.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
virtio-comment@lists.oasis-open.org,
virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org, jasowang@redhat.com,
cohuck@redhat.com, sgarzare@redhat.com, stefanha@redhat.com,
nrupal.jani@intel.com, Piotr.Uminski@intel.com,
hang.yuan@intel.com
Cc: virtio@lists.oasis-open.org, Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>,
Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@intel.com>,
pasic@linux.ibm.com, Shahaf Shuler <shahafs@nvidia.com>,
Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com>
Subject: [virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH v12 04/10] admin: introduce virtio admin virtqueues
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2023 18:32:50 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <916e2320-2874-329a-cf57-6a96644e6ba2@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2334f663f1fd0f11e79235425c6dcf9aa8fa8c1c.1682354275.git.mst@redhat.com>
On 4/24/2023 12:44 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> The admin virtqueues will be the first interface used to issue admin commands.
>
> Currently the virtio specification defines control virtqueue to manipulate
> features and configuration of the device it operates on:
> virtio-net, virtio-scsi, etc all have existing control virtqueues. However,
> control virtqueue commands are device type specific, which makes it very
> difficult to extend for device agnostic commands.
>
> Keeping the device-specific virtqueue separate from the admin virtqueue
> is simpler and has fewer potential problems. I don't think creating
> common infrastructure for device-specific control virtqueues across
> device types worthwhile or within the scope of this patch series.
>
> To support this requirement in a more generic way, this patch introduces
> a new admin virtqueue interface.
> The admin virtqueue can be seen as the virtqueue analog to a transport.
> The admin queue thus does nothing device type-specific (net, scsi, etc)
> and instead focuses on transporting the admin commands.
>
> We also support more than one admin virtqueue, for QoS and
> scalability requirements.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
>
> ---
>
> changes since v11:
> ack by stefan
> queues->enqueues to address comment by parav
>
> changes since v10:
>
> explain ordering of commands as suggested by Stefan
> dropped Max's S.O.B
> reword commit log as suggested by David
> minor wording fixes suggested by David
> ---
> admin.tex | 75 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> content.tex | 7 +++--
> 2 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/admin.tex b/admin.tex
> index d6042e4..91e0cba 100644
> --- a/admin.tex
> +++ b/admin.tex
> @@ -182,3 +182,78 @@ \subsection{Group administration commands}\label{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virti
> \field{command_specific_data} and \field{command_specific_result}
> depends on these structures and is described separately or is
> implicit in the structure description.
> +
> +\section{Administration Virtqueues}\label{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Administration Virtqueues}
> +
> +An administration virtqueue of an owner device is used to submit
> +group administration commands. An owner device can have more
> +than one administration virtqueue.
> +
> +If VIRTIO_F_ADMIN_VQ has been negotiated, an owner device exposes one
> +or more adminstration virtqueues. The number and locations of the
> +administration virtqueues are exposed by the owner device in a transport
> +specific manner.
> +
> +The driver enqueues requests to an arbitrary administration
> +virtqueue, and they are used by the device on that same
> +virtqueue. It is the responsibility of the driver to ensure
> +strict request ordering for commands, because they will be
> +consumed with no order constraints. For example, if consistency
> +is required then the driver can wait for the processing of a
> +first command by the device to be completed before submitting
> +another command depending on the first one.
> +
> +Administration virtqueues are used as follows:
> +\begin{itemize}
> +\item The driver submits the command using the \field{struct virtio_admin_cmd}
> +structure using a buffer consisting of two parts: a device-readable one followed by a
> +device-writable one.
> +\item the device-readable part includes fields from \field{opcode}
> +through \field{command_specific_data}.
> +\item the device-writeable buffer includes fields from \field{status}
> +through \field{command_specific_result} inclusive.
> +\end{itemize}
> +
> +For each command, this specification describes a distinct
> +format structure used for \field{command_specific_data} and
> +\field{command_specific_result}, the length of these fields
> +depends on the command.
> +
> +However, to ensure forward compatibility
> +\begin{itemize}
> +\item drivers are allowed to submit buffers that are longer
> +than the device expects
> +(that is, longer than the length of
> +\field{opcode} through \field{command_specific_data}).
> +This allows the driver to maintain
> +a single format structure even if some structure fields are
> +unused by the device.
> +\item drivers are allowed to submit buffers that are shorter
> +than what the device expects
> +(that is, shorter than the length of \field{status} through
> +\field{command_specific_result}). This allows the device to maintain
> +a single format structure even if some structure fields are
> +unused by the driver.
> +\end{itemize}
> +
> +The device compares the length of each part (device-readable and
> +device-writeable) of the buffer as submitted by driver to what it
> +expects and then silently truncates the structures to either the
> +length submitted by the driver, or the length described in this
> +specification, whichever is shorter. The device silently ignores
> +any data falling outside the shorter of the two lengths. Any
> +missing fields are interpreted as set to zero.
> +
> +Similarly, the driver compares the used buffer length
> +of the buffer to what it expects and then silently
> +truncates the structure to the used buffer length.
> +The driver silently ignores any data falling outside
> +the used buffer length reported by the device. Any missing
> +fields are interpreted as set to zero.
> +
> +This simplifies driver and device implementations since the
> +driver/device can simply maintain a single large structure (such
> +as a C structure) for a command and its result. As new versions
> +of the specification are designed, new fields can be added to the
> +tail of a structure, with the driver/device using the full
> +structure without concern for versioning.
> diff --git a/content.tex b/content.tex
> index 04592fb..2eb15fa 100644
> --- a/content.tex
> +++ b/content.tex
> @@ -99,10 +99,10 @@ \section{Feature Bits}\label{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Feature B
> \begin{description}
> \item[0 to 23, and 50 to 127] Feature bits for the specific device type
>
> -\item[24 to 40] Feature bits reserved for extensions to the queue and
> +\item[24 to 41] Feature bits reserved for extensions to the queue and
> feature negotiation mechanisms
>
> -\item[41 to 49, and 128 and above] Feature bits reserved for future extensions.
> +\item[42 to 49, and 128 and above] Feature bits reserved for future extensions.
> \end{description}
>
> \begin{note}
> @@ -7684,6 +7684,9 @@ \chapter{Reserved Feature Bits}\label{sec:Reserved Feature Bits}
> that the driver can reset a queue individually.
> See \ref{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Virtqueues / Virtqueue Reset}.
>
> + \item[VIRTIO_F_ADMIN_VQ(41)] This feature indicates that the device exposes one or more
> + administration virtqueues.
> +
> \end{description}
>
> \drivernormative{\section}{Reserved Feature Bits}{Reserved Feature Bits}
Reviewed-by: Parav Pandit <parav@nvidia.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-help@lists.oasis-open.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-24 22:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-24 16:44 [virtio-dev] [PATCH v12 00/10] Introduce device group and device management Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-04-24 16:44 ` [virtio-dev] [PATCH v12 01/10] virtio: document forward compatibility guarantees Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-04-24 16:44 ` [virtio-dev] [PATCH v12 02/10] admin: introduce device group and related concepts Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-04-24 21:47 ` [virtio-dev] " Parav Pandit
2023-04-24 16:44 ` [virtio-dev] [PATCH v12 03/10] admin: introduce group administration commands Michael S. Tsirkin
[not found] ` <d9b0454c-747a-4ac9-b00d-005e066fa3e4@nvidia.com>
2023-04-24 21:33 ` [virtio-dev] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-04-24 22:07 ` Parav Pandit
2023-04-25 6:20 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-04-25 13:25 ` [virtio-dev] " Parav Pandit
2023-04-25 13:31 ` [virtio-dev] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-04-25 13:38 ` [virtio-dev] " Parav Pandit
2023-04-25 20:04 ` [virtio-dev] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-04-25 20:18 ` [virtio-dev] " Parav Pandit
2023-04-25 20:55 ` [virtio-dev] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-04-26 18:18 ` [virtio-dev] RE: [virtio-comment] " Parav Pandit
2023-04-24 16:44 ` [virtio-dev] [PATCH v12 04/10] admin: introduce virtio admin virtqueues Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-04-24 22:32 ` Parav Pandit [this message]
2023-04-24 16:44 ` [virtio-dev] [PATCH v12 05/10] pci: add admin vq registers to virtio over pci Michael S. Tsirkin
[not found] ` <5858e2e6-0b50-c155-85e9-eea6dfb533e1@nvidia.com>
2023-04-24 22:14 ` [virtio-dev] " Parav Pandit
[not found] ` <5cb79b37-a066-283c-eee7-afd26146d988@nvidia.com>
2023-04-26 22:11 ` [virtio-dev] " Parav Pandit
[not found] ` <b7addd39-d913-700f-ac67-1412825d580b@nvidia.com>
2023-04-27 0:11 ` Parav Pandit
2023-05-05 15:12 ` [virtio-dev] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-05-05 15:14 ` [virtio-dev] " Parav Pandit
2023-04-27 17:57 ` [virtio-dev] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-05-05 15:22 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-05-05 15:25 ` [virtio-dev] " Parav Pandit
2023-04-24 22:29 ` [virtio-dev] " Parav Pandit
2023-04-24 16:44 ` [virtio-dev] [PATCH v12 06/10] mmio: document ADMIN_VQ as reserved Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-04-24 16:44 ` [virtio-dev] [PATCH v12 07/10] ccw: " Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-04-24 16:44 ` [virtio-dev] [PATCH v12 08/10] admin: command list discovery Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-04-24 22:27 ` [virtio-dev] " Parav Pandit
2023-04-24 16:44 ` [virtio-dev] [PATCH v12 09/10] admin: conformance clauses Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-04-24 16:44 ` [virtio-dev] [PATCH v12 10/10] ccw: document more reserved features Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-04-24 22:17 ` [virtio-dev] " Parav Pandit
2023-04-24 21:34 ` [virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH v12 00/10] Introduce device group and device management Parav Pandit
2023-05-02 7:51 ` [virtio-dev] Re: [virtio] " David Edmondson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=916e2320-2874-329a-cf57-6a96644e6ba2@nvidia.com \
--to=parav@nvidia.com \
--cc=Piotr.Uminski@intel.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=hang.yuan@intel.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=jiri@nvidia.com \
--cc=lingshan.zhu@intel.com \
--cc=mgurtovoy@nvidia.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=nrupal.jani@intel.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
--cc=shahafs@nvidia.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=virtio-comment@lists.oasis-open.org \
--cc=virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org \
--cc=virtio@lists.oasis-open.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox