From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2022 14:06:50 +0200 From: Leon Romanovsky Subject: Re: [virtio-dev] Re: [RFC] Virtio RDMA Message-ID: References: <19CC8304-C2B3-45A7-BFDB-28E9D0D4A02A@bytedance.com> <2818E401-AA08-42DB-90C0-75B199ECE47E@bytedance.com> <38D3D312-E507-426F-BB3E-211AC273593B@bytedance.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <38D3D312-E507-426F-BB3E-211AC273593B@bytedance.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To: Junji Wei Cc: Jason Wang , Doug Ledford , Jason Gunthorpe , mst , yuval.shaia.ml@gmail.com, Marcel Apfelbaum , Cornelia Huck , Hannes Reinecke , Virtio-Dev , Yongji Xie , =?utf-8?B?5p+056iz?= , Xiongchun Duan , zhoujielong@bytedance.com, zhangqianyu.sys@bytedance.com, RDMA mailing list List-ID: On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 06:03:29PM +0800, Junji Wei wrote: >=20 > > On Feb 16, 2022, at 5:48 PM, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > >=20 > > On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 04:00:53PM +0800, Junji Wei wrote: > >=20 > > <...> > >=20 > >>>=20 > >>> What is the use case for this virtio-rdma? Especially in context of R= XE. > >>=20 > >> Hmm... yes, we didn=E2=80=99t find one. In passthrough case we can use= RXE directly. > >=20 > > It doesn't sound like a good sales pitch. >=20 > Maybe I misunderstanded what you mean. We mean we didn=E2=80=99t find a u= ser case=20 > for virtio-rdma with passthrough net device. Do you want to know the user > case for our virtio-rdma(RoCE) proposal? Yes, please. >=20 > Thanks. >=20