[virtio-dev] RE: [virtio-comment] [PATCH 5/5] virtio-pci: implement VIRTIO_F_QUEUE_STATE

Parav Pandit
2023-09-12T05:51:41Z

> From: Zhu, Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@intel.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2023 9:19 AM
>
> On 9/11/2023 7:50 PM, Parav Pandit wrote:
> >> From: Zhu, Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@intel.com>
> >> Sent: Monday, September 11, 2023 3:03 PM By the way, do you see
> >> anything we need to improve in this series?
> > Admin commands for passthrough devices of [1] is comprehensive proposal
> covering all the aspects.
> >
> > To me [1] is superset work that covers all needed functionality and downtime
> aspects.
> >
> > I plan to improve [1] with v1 this week by extending device context and
> addressing other review comments.
> >
> > [1]
> > https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-comment/202309/msg00061.h
> > tml
> I am not sure, we have discussed a lot about the potential issues in the treads. I
> guess we should resolve them first. E.g., nested use cases.
You are using nesting use case as the _only_ use case and attempt to steer using that.
Not right.

If you want to discuss, then lets have both the use cases, attempt to converge and if we can its really good.
If we cannot, both requirements should be handled differently.