Discussion of the implementations of VIRTIO specification
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Virtio-Dev <virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org>
Subject: Re: [virtio-dev] Re: queue_enable vs QueueReady
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2020 14:46:09 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <de4dcb99-ac2c-5740-d97c-78f8256eaca0@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200602001440-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>


On 2020/6/2 下午12:20, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 02, 2020 at 10:57:19AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>> On 2020/6/1 下午2:01, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>> On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 09:06:36PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>>>> Hi:
>>>>
>>>> I found ambiguity in the virtio specification:
>>>>
>>>> In PCI part, it describes the queue_enable as:
>>>>
>>>> The driver uses this to selectively prevent the device from executing
>>>> requests from this virtqueue. 1 - enabled; 0 - disabled.
>>>>
>>>> In MMIO part, it describes the QueueReady as:
>>>>
>>>> Writing one (0x1) to this register notifies the device that it can execute
>>>> requests from this virtual queue. Reading from this register returns the
>>>> last value written to it. Both read and write accesses apply to the queue
>>>> selected by writing to QueueSel.
>>>>
>>>> If I understand this correctly, they have the same meaning, but the driver
>>>> requirements section looks conflict:
>>>>
>>>> PCI said: The driver MUST NOT write a 0 to queue_enable.
>>>>
>>>> MMIO said:
>>>>
>>>> To stop using the queue the driver MUST write zero (0x0) to this QueueReady
>>>> and MUST read the value back to ensure synchronization.
>>>>
>>>> So we can't disable a queue via queue_enable but QueueReady. Any reason for
>>>> such inconsistency?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>> PCI assumed device reset is enough to stop all queues.  We had tons of
>>> bugs around shutdown because of this, so in hindsight, MMIO had maybe a
>>> better idea.
>>>
>>> Ability to stop a queue and take back buffers would be nice, e.g. serial
>>> is kind of messed up around port disconnect without it.
>>
>> Yes, but this inconsistency brings trouble for vDPA implementation which has
>> a set_queue_ready() and we do the following in virtio_vdpa as MMIO did:
>>
>>      /* Select and deactivate the queue */
>>      ops->set_vq_ready(vdpa, index, 0);
>>      WARN_ON(ops->get_vq_ready(vdpa, index));
>>
>> The codes seems to work fine for IFC (a violation of the spec probably) but
>> not Qemu's virtio-net-pci.
>>
>> Thanks
> What do you mean "not Qemu's virtio-net-pci"? Which implementation
> of .set_vq_ready do you use?


I meant the queue_enable implemented in qemu virtio-net-pci.

See my patch: [PATCH] virtio-pci: fix queue_enable write


>
> According to spec, I would expect this callback to do something
> other that writing into queue_enable.
>
> BTW I noticed this:
>
>          if (cmd == VHOST_VDPA_SET_VRING_ENABLE) {
>                  if (copy_from_user(&s, argp, sizeof(s)))
>                          return -EFAULT;
>                  ops->set_vq_ready(vdpa, idx, s.num);
>                  return 0;
>          }
>
> I'm guessing s.num should be 1, right?


It was a value set by userspace, so I think we can't have this assumption.

Thanks


>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-help@lists.oasis-open.org


      reply	other threads:[~2020-06-02  6:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-28 13:06 [virtio-dev] queue_enable vs QueueReady Jason Wang
2020-05-28 14:00 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2020-05-29  2:57   ` Jason Wang
2020-06-01  6:01 ` [virtio-dev] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-06-02  2:57   ` Jason Wang
2020-06-02  4:20     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-06-02  6:46       ` Jason Wang [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=de4dcb99-ac2c-5740-d97c-78f8256eaca0@redhat.com \
    --to=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox