From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: SF Markus Elfring Subject: [PATCH 0/4] block-virtio: Fine-tuning for two function implementations Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 14:10:05 +0200 Message-ID: <02054675-8395-ac81-6863-e3a5cbfc9032@users.sourceforge.net> References: <566ABCD9.1060404@users.sourceforge.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <566ABCD9.1060404@users.sourceforge.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: Julia Lawall , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, LKML List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org From: Markus Elfring Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 14:05:05 +0200 A few update suggestions were taken into account from static source code analysis. Markus Elfring (4): Use kmalloc_array() in init_vq() Less function calls in init_vq() after error detection Delete an unnecessary initialisation in init_vq() Rename a jump label in virtblk_get_id() drivers/block/virtio_blk.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) -- 2.10.0