From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: cohuck@redhat.com, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] virtio: Limit the retries on a virtio device reset
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2017 19:42:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <05de15a6-9c4f-f44f-b8bd-ca04e7e91499@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170824171253-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
On 24/08/2017 16:19, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 06:33:02PM +0200, Pierre Morel wrote:
>> Reseting a device can sometime fail, even a virtual device.
>> If the device is not reseted after a while the driver should
>> abandon the retries.
>> This is the change proposed for the modern virtio_pci.
>>
>> More generally, when this happens,the virtio driver can set the
>> VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_FAILED status flag to advertise the caller.
>>
>> The virtio core can test if the reset was succesful by testing
>> this flag after a reset.
>>
>> This behavior is backward compatible with existing drivers.
>> This behavior seems to me compatible with Virtio-1.0 specifications,
>> Chapters 2.1 Device Status Field.
>> There I definitively need your opinion: Is it right?
>>
>> This patch also lead to another question:
>> do we care if a device provided by the hypervisor is buggy?
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> So I think this is not the best place to start to add error recovery.
I agree, there can not be any error recovery there.
If reset does not work we can let fall the device until next reset of
the hypervisor.
> It should be much more common to have a situation where device gets
> broken while it's being used. Spec has a NEEDS_RESET flag for this.
Yes the device side can set this flag, but it is another problem, it is
supposing that:
- the transport, device side, still works.
- it is able to detect that the device need a reset
- a reset is effective
>
> I think we should start by coding up that support in all virtio drivers.
>
> As a next step, we can add more code to detect unexpected behaviour by
> the host and mark device as broken. Then we can do more things by
> looking at the broken flag.
It seems difficult to me.
But may be I went too fast to the conclusion that there is nothing to do.
I still think about it.
Best regards
Pierre
>
>
>> ---
>> drivers/virtio/virtio.c | 4 ++++
>> drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern.c | 11 ++++++++++-
>> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio.c
>> index 48230a5..6255dc4 100644
>> --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio.c
>> +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio.c
>> @@ -324,6 +324,8 @@ int register_virtio_device(struct virtio_device *dev)
>> /* We always start by resetting the device, in case a previous
>> * driver messed it up. This also tests that code path a little. */
>> dev->config->reset(dev);
>> + if (dev->config->get_status(dev) & VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_FAILED)
>> + return -EIO;
>>
>> /* Acknowledge that we've seen the device. */
>> virtio_add_status(dev, VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_ACKNOWLEDGE);
>> @@ -373,6 +375,8 @@ int virtio_device_restore(struct virtio_device *dev)
>> /* We always start by resetting the device, in case a previous
>> * driver messed it up. */
>> dev->config->reset(dev);
>> + if (dev->config->get_status(dev) & VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_FAILED)
>> + return -EIO;
>>
>> /* Acknowledge that we've seen the device. */
>> virtio_add_status(dev, VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_ACKNOWLEDGE);
>> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern.c
>> index 2555d80..bfc5fc1 100644
>> --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern.c
>> +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern.c
>> @@ -270,6 +270,7 @@ static void vp_set_status(struct virtio_device *vdev, u8 status)
>> static void vp_reset(struct virtio_device *vdev)
>> {
>> struct virtio_pci_device *vp_dev = to_vp_device(vdev);
>> + int retry_count = 10;
>> /* 0 status means a reset. */
>> vp_iowrite8(0, &vp_dev->common->device_status);
>> /* After writing 0 to device_status, the driver MUST wait for a read of
>> @@ -277,8 +278,16 @@ static void vp_reset(struct virtio_device *vdev)
>> * This will flush out the status write, and flush in device writes,
>> * including MSI-X interrupts, if any.
>> */
>> - while (vp_ioread8(&vp_dev->common->device_status))
>> + while (vp_ioread8(&vp_dev->common->device_status) && retry_count--)
>> msleep(1);
>> + /* If the read did not return 0 before the timeout consider that
>> + * the device failed.
>> + */
>> + if (retry_count <= 0) {
>> + virtio_add_status(vdev, VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_FAILED);
>> + return;
>> + }
>> + virtio_add_status(vdev, VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_ACKNOWLEDGE);
>> /* Flush pending VQ/configuration callbacks. */
>> vp_synchronize_vectors(vdev);
>> }
>> --
>> 2.3.0
>
--
Pierre Morel
Linux/KVM/QEMU in Böblingen - Germany
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-24 17:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-23 16:33 [PATCH] [RFC] virtio: Limit the retries on a virtio device reset Pierre Morel
2017-08-24 11:07 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-08-24 12:16 ` Pierre Morel
2017-08-24 14:12 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-08-24 17:07 ` Pierre Morel
2017-08-24 21:16 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-08-25 8:26 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-08-25 11:21 ` Pierre Morel
2017-08-25 16:43 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-08-24 14:19 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-08-24 17:42 ` Pierre Morel [this message]
2017-08-24 21:23 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-08-25 8:33 ` Pierre Morel
2017-08-25 16:46 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=05de15a6-9c4f-f44f-b8bd-ca04e7e91499@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=pmorel@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).