From: Bui Quang Minh <minhquangbui99@gmail.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, "Jason Wang" <jasowang@redhat.com>,
"Xuan Zhuo" <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>,
"Eugenio Pérez" <eperezma@redhat.com>,
"Andrew Lunn" <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
"Jesper Dangaard Brouer" <hawk@kernel.org>,
"John Fastabend" <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
"Stanislav Fomichev" <sdf@fomichev.me>,
virtualization@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/3] virtio-net: make refill work a per receive queue work
Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2025 00:03:05 +0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0d5469f9-9918-4707-a390-533f53eadbe4@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251224051747-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
On 12/24/25 17:19, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 23, 2025 at 10:25:31PM +0700, Bui Quang Minh wrote:
>> Currently, the refill work is a global delayed work for all the receive
>> queues. This commit makes the refill work a per receive queue so that we
>> can manage them separately and avoid further mistakes. It also helps the
>> successfully refilled queue avoid the napi_disable in the global delayed
>> refill work like before.
>>
> this commit log is unreadable. before what? what is the problem with
> "refilled queue napi_disable" this refers to.
I mean that currently even if one RX queue is refilled successfully but
another is not, then the successful one still gets napi_disable() in the
global refill work. It will unnecessarily disrupt that queue I think.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Bui Quang Minh <minhquangbui99@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 155 ++++++++++++++++++---------------------
>> 1 file changed, 72 insertions(+), 83 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
>> index 1bb3aeca66c6..63126e490bda 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
>> @@ -379,6 +379,15 @@ struct receive_queue {
>> struct xdp_rxq_info xsk_rxq_info;
>>
>> struct xdp_buff **xsk_buffs;
>> +
>> + /* Is delayed refill enabled? */
>> + bool refill_enabled;
>> +
>> + /* The lock to synchronize the access to refill_enabled */
>> + spinlock_t refill_lock;
>> +
>> + /* Work struct for delayed refilling if we run low on memory. */
>> + struct delayed_work refill;
>> };
>>
>> #define VIRTIO_NET_RSS_MAX_KEY_SIZE 40
>> @@ -441,9 +450,6 @@ struct virtnet_info {
>> /* Packet virtio header size */
>> u8 hdr_len;
>>
>> - /* Work struct for delayed refilling if we run low on memory. */
>> - struct delayed_work refill;
>> -
>> /* UDP tunnel support */
>> bool tx_tnl;
>>
>> @@ -451,12 +457,6 @@ struct virtnet_info {
>>
>> bool rx_tnl_csum;
>>
>> - /* Is delayed refill enabled? */
>> - bool refill_enabled;
>> -
>> - /* The lock to synchronize the access to refill_enabled */
>> - spinlock_t refill_lock;
>> -
>> /* Work struct for config space updates */
>> struct work_struct config_work;
>>
>> @@ -720,18 +720,18 @@ static void virtnet_rq_free_buf(struct virtnet_info *vi,
>> put_page(virt_to_head_page(buf));
>> }
>>
>> -static void enable_delayed_refill(struct virtnet_info *vi)
>> +static void enable_delayed_refill(struct receive_queue *rq)
>> {
>> - spin_lock_bh(&vi->refill_lock);
>> - vi->refill_enabled = true;
>> - spin_unlock_bh(&vi->refill_lock);
>> + spin_lock_bh(&rq->refill_lock);
>> + rq->refill_enabled = true;
>> + spin_unlock_bh(&rq->refill_lock);
>> }
>>
>> -static void disable_delayed_refill(struct virtnet_info *vi)
>> +static void disable_delayed_refill(struct receive_queue *rq)
>> {
>> - spin_lock_bh(&vi->refill_lock);
>> - vi->refill_enabled = false;
>> - spin_unlock_bh(&vi->refill_lock);
>> + spin_lock_bh(&rq->refill_lock);
>> + rq->refill_enabled = false;
>> + spin_unlock_bh(&rq->refill_lock);
>> }
>>
>> static void enable_rx_mode_work(struct virtnet_info *vi)
>> @@ -2950,38 +2950,19 @@ static void virtnet_napi_disable(struct receive_queue *rq)
>>
>> static void refill_work(struct work_struct *work)
>> {
>> - struct virtnet_info *vi =
>> - container_of(work, struct virtnet_info, refill.work);
>> + struct receive_queue *rq =
>> + container_of(work, struct receive_queue, refill.work);
>> bool still_empty;
>> - int i;
>> -
>> - for (i = 0; i < vi->curr_queue_pairs; i++) {
>> - struct receive_queue *rq = &vi->rq[i];
>>
>> - /*
>> - * When queue API support is added in the future and the call
>> - * below becomes napi_disable_locked, this driver will need to
>> - * be refactored.
>> - *
>> - * One possible solution would be to:
>> - * - cancel refill_work with cancel_delayed_work (note:
>> - * non-sync)
>> - * - cancel refill_work with cancel_delayed_work_sync in
>> - * virtnet_remove after the netdev is unregistered
>> - * - wrap all of the work in a lock (perhaps the netdev
>> - * instance lock)
>> - * - check netif_running() and return early to avoid a race
>> - */
>> - napi_disable(&rq->napi);
>> - still_empty = !try_fill_recv(vi, rq, GFP_KERNEL);
>> - virtnet_napi_do_enable(rq->vq, &rq->napi);
>> + napi_disable(&rq->napi);
>> + still_empty = !try_fill_recv(rq->vq->vdev->priv, rq, GFP_KERNEL);
>> + virtnet_napi_do_enable(rq->vq, &rq->napi);
>>
>> - /* In theory, this can happen: if we don't get any buffers in
>> - * we will *never* try to fill again.
>> - */
>> - if (still_empty)
>> - schedule_delayed_work(&vi->refill, HZ/2);
>> - }
>> + /* In theory, this can happen: if we don't get any buffers in
>> + * we will *never* try to fill again.
>> + */
>> + if (still_empty)
>> + schedule_delayed_work(&rq->refill, HZ / 2);
>> }
>>
>> static int virtnet_receive_xsk_bufs(struct virtnet_info *vi,
>> @@ -3048,10 +3029,10 @@ static int virtnet_receive(struct receive_queue *rq, int budget,
>>
>> if (rq->vq->num_free > min((unsigned int)budget, virtqueue_get_vring_size(rq->vq)) / 2) {
>> if (!try_fill_recv(vi, rq, GFP_ATOMIC)) {
>> - spin_lock(&vi->refill_lock);
>> - if (vi->refill_enabled)
>> - schedule_delayed_work(&vi->refill, 0);
>> - spin_unlock(&vi->refill_lock);
>> + spin_lock(&rq->refill_lock);
>> + if (rq->refill_enabled)
>> + schedule_delayed_work(&rq->refill, 0);
>> + spin_unlock(&rq->refill_lock);
>> }
>> }
>>
>> @@ -3226,13 +3207,13 @@ static int virtnet_open(struct net_device *dev)
>> struct virtnet_info *vi = netdev_priv(dev);
>> int i, err;
>>
>> - enable_delayed_refill(vi);
>> -
>> for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) {
>> - if (i < vi->curr_queue_pairs)
>> + if (i < vi->curr_queue_pairs) {
>> + enable_delayed_refill(&vi->rq[i]);
>> /* Make sure we have some buffers: if oom use wq. */
>> if (!try_fill_recv(vi, &vi->rq[i], GFP_KERNEL))
>> - schedule_delayed_work(&vi->refill, 0);
>> + schedule_delayed_work(&vi->rq[i].refill, 0);
>> + }
>>
>> err = virtnet_enable_queue_pair(vi, i);
>> if (err < 0)
>> @@ -3251,10 +3232,9 @@ static int virtnet_open(struct net_device *dev)
>> return 0;
>>
>> err_enable_qp:
>> - disable_delayed_refill(vi);
>> - cancel_delayed_work_sync(&vi->refill);
>> -
>> for (i--; i >= 0; i--) {
>> + disable_delayed_refill(&vi->rq[i]);
>> + cancel_delayed_work_sync(&vi->rq[i].refill);
>> virtnet_disable_queue_pair(vi, i);
>> virtnet_cancel_dim(vi, &vi->rq[i].dim);
>> }
>> @@ -3447,14 +3427,15 @@ static void virtnet_rx_pause_all(struct virtnet_info *vi)
>> {
>> int i;
>>
>> - /*
>> - * Make sure refill_work does not run concurrently to
>> - * avoid napi_disable race which leads to deadlock.
>> - */
>> - disable_delayed_refill(vi);
>> - cancel_delayed_work_sync(&vi->refill);
>> - for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++)
>> + for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) {
>> + /*
>> + * Make sure refill_work does not run concurrently to
>> + * avoid napi_disable race which leads to deadlock.
>> + */
>> + disable_delayed_refill(&vi->rq[i]);
>> + cancel_delayed_work_sync(&vi->rq[i].refill);
>> __virtnet_rx_pause(vi, &vi->rq[i]);
>> + }
>> }
>>
>> static void virtnet_rx_pause(struct virtnet_info *vi, struct receive_queue *rq)
>> @@ -3463,8 +3444,8 @@ static void virtnet_rx_pause(struct virtnet_info *vi, struct receive_queue *rq)
>> * Make sure refill_work does not run concurrently to
>> * avoid napi_disable race which leads to deadlock.
>> */
>> - disable_delayed_refill(vi);
>> - cancel_delayed_work_sync(&vi->refill);
>> + disable_delayed_refill(rq);
>> + cancel_delayed_work_sync(&rq->refill);
>> __virtnet_rx_pause(vi, rq);
>> }
>>
>> @@ -3481,25 +3462,26 @@ static void __virtnet_rx_resume(struct virtnet_info *vi,
>> virtnet_napi_enable(rq);
>>
>> if (schedule_refill)
>> - schedule_delayed_work(&vi->refill, 0);
>> + schedule_delayed_work(&rq->refill, 0);
>> }
>>
>> static void virtnet_rx_resume_all(struct virtnet_info *vi)
>> {
>> int i;
>>
>> - enable_delayed_refill(vi);
>> for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) {
>> - if (i < vi->curr_queue_pairs)
>> + if (i < vi->curr_queue_pairs) {
>> + enable_delayed_refill(&vi->rq[i]);
>> __virtnet_rx_resume(vi, &vi->rq[i], true);
>> - else
>> + } else {
>> __virtnet_rx_resume(vi, &vi->rq[i], false);
>> + }
>> }
>> }
>>
>> static void virtnet_rx_resume(struct virtnet_info *vi, struct receive_queue *rq)
>> {
>> - enable_delayed_refill(vi);
>> + enable_delayed_refill(rq);
>> __virtnet_rx_resume(vi, rq, true);
>> }
>>
>> @@ -3830,10 +3812,16 @@ static int virtnet_set_queues(struct virtnet_info *vi, u16 queue_pairs)
>> succ:
>> vi->curr_queue_pairs = queue_pairs;
>> /* virtnet_open() will refill when device is going to up. */
>> - spin_lock_bh(&vi->refill_lock);
>> - if (dev->flags & IFF_UP && vi->refill_enabled)
>> - schedule_delayed_work(&vi->refill, 0);
>> - spin_unlock_bh(&vi->refill_lock);
>> + if (dev->flags & IFF_UP) {
>> + int i;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < vi->curr_queue_pairs; i++) {
>> + spin_lock_bh(&vi->rq[i].refill_lock);
>> + if (vi->rq[i].refill_enabled)
>> + schedule_delayed_work(&vi->rq[i].refill, 0);
>> + spin_unlock_bh(&vi->rq[i].refill_lock);
>> + }
>> + }
>>
>> return 0;
>> }
>> @@ -3843,10 +3831,6 @@ static int virtnet_close(struct net_device *dev)
>> struct virtnet_info *vi = netdev_priv(dev);
>> int i;
>>
>> - /* Make sure NAPI doesn't schedule refill work */
>> - disable_delayed_refill(vi);
>> - /* Make sure refill_work doesn't re-enable napi! */
>> - cancel_delayed_work_sync(&vi->refill);
>> /* Prevent the config change callback from changing carrier
>> * after close
>> */
>> @@ -3857,6 +3841,10 @@ static int virtnet_close(struct net_device *dev)
>> cancel_work_sync(&vi->config_work);
>>
>> for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) {
>> + /* Make sure NAPI doesn't schedule refill work */
>> + disable_delayed_refill(&vi->rq[i]);
>> + /* Make sure refill_work doesn't re-enable napi! */
>> + cancel_delayed_work_sync(&vi->rq[i].refill);
>> virtnet_disable_queue_pair(vi, i);
>> virtnet_cancel_dim(vi, &vi->rq[i].dim);
>> }
>> @@ -5802,7 +5790,6 @@ static int virtnet_restore_up(struct virtio_device *vdev)
>>
>> virtio_device_ready(vdev);
>>
>> - enable_delayed_refill(vi);
>> enable_rx_mode_work(vi);
>>
>> if (netif_running(vi->dev)) {
>> @@ -6559,8 +6546,9 @@ static int virtnet_alloc_queues(struct virtnet_info *vi)
>> if (!vi->rq)
>> goto err_rq;
>>
>> - INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&vi->refill, refill_work);
>> for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) {
>> + INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&vi->rq[i].refill, refill_work);
>> + spin_lock_init(&vi->rq[i].refill_lock);
>> vi->rq[i].pages = NULL;
>> netif_napi_add_config(vi->dev, &vi->rq[i].napi, virtnet_poll,
>> i);
>> @@ -6901,7 +6889,6 @@ static int virtnet_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
>>
>> INIT_WORK(&vi->config_work, virtnet_config_changed_work);
>> INIT_WORK(&vi->rx_mode_work, virtnet_rx_mode_work);
>> - spin_lock_init(&vi->refill_lock);
>>
>> if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_MRG_RXBUF)) {
>> vi->mergeable_rx_bufs = true;
>> @@ -7165,7 +7152,9 @@ static int virtnet_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
>> net_failover_destroy(vi->failover);
>> free_vqs:
>> virtio_reset_device(vdev);
>> - cancel_delayed_work_sync(&vi->refill);
>> + for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++)
>> + cancel_delayed_work_sync(&vi->rq[i].refill);
>> +
>> free_receive_page_frags(vi);
>> virtnet_del_vqs(vi);
>> free:
>> --
>> 2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-24 17:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-23 15:25 [PATCH net 0/3] virtio-net: fix the deadlock when disabling rx NAPI Bui Quang Minh
2025-12-23 15:25 ` [PATCH net 1/3] virtio-net: make refill work a per receive queue work Bui Quang Minh
2025-12-24 0:52 ` Jason Wang
2025-12-24 1:37 ` Xuan Zhuo
2025-12-24 1:47 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2025-12-24 16:49 ` Bui Quang Minh
2025-12-25 15:55 ` Bui Quang Minh
2025-12-25 16:27 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2025-12-25 7:33 ` Jason Wang
2025-12-25 16:27 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2025-12-26 1:31 ` Jason Wang
2025-12-26 7:37 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2025-12-29 2:57 ` Jason Wang
2025-12-30 16:28 ` Bui Quang Minh
2025-12-30 16:44 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2025-12-31 7:30 ` Jason Wang
2025-12-31 15:25 ` Bui Quang Minh
2025-12-24 16:43 ` Bui Quang Minh
2025-12-24 1:34 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2025-12-24 10:19 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2025-12-24 17:03 ` Bui Quang Minh [this message]
2025-12-23 15:25 ` [PATCH net 2/3] virtio-net: ensure rx NAPI is enabled before enabling refill work Bui Quang Minh
2025-12-24 1:45 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2025-12-24 17:49 ` Bui Quang Minh
2025-12-24 10:20 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2025-12-23 15:25 ` [PATCH net 3/3] virtio-net: schedule the pending refill work after being enabled Bui Quang Minh
2025-12-24 10:17 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0d5469f9-9918-4707-a390-533f53eadbe4@gmail.com \
--to=minhquangbui99@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).