From: Dragos Tatulea <dtatulea@nvidia.com>
To: "mst@redhat.com" <mst@redhat.com>,
"eperezma@redhat.com" <eperezma@redhat.com>,
Linfeng Sun <linfeng.sun.dev@gmail.com>
Cc: "virtualization@lists.linux.dev" <virtualization@lists.linux.dev>,
Jason Wang <jasowangio@gmail.com>
Subject: [REGRESSION] vhost_iotlb: bound map allocation in add_range breaks vhost-vdpa on hosts with fragmented memory
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2026 13:44:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0f51918f-88c9-4930-ae5a-616bbe73e7cb@nvidia.com> (raw)
Hi,
We've started seeing regressions for a while in our verification CI for
vDPA Live Migration tests. Occasionally the FW returns a syndrome
related to invalid mappings during device reset.
We've narrowed this down to commit 1ed35ac7f3fe "vhost_iotlb: bound map
allocation in add_range" which limits the iotlbs to 2K by default. On a
host with fragmented memory you can get easily more than 2K entries.
This results in truncated/incomplete iotlbs mapped to the device and when
the rings happen to be outside of the first 2K mappings the FW will complain
because it got addresses that are not mapped.
I'm not sure how to fix this though:
- LLM suggests setting the 2K limit only in VA mode and using 0 as
before in PA mode because PA mode is limited anyway. Does this
work?
- Can we detect this and reject the device / stop the device at boot time?
Probably not as this doesn't cover Live Migration.
Any thoughts?
Thanks,
Dragos
next reply other threads:[~2026-10-28 12:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-28 12:44 Dragos Tatulea [this message]
2026-10-28 13:05 ` [REGRESSION] vhost_iotlb: bound map allocation in add_range breaks vhost-vdpa on hosts with fragmented memory Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-10-28 14:46 ` Dragos Tatulea
2026-10-28 15:17 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-10-30 13:47 ` Dragos Tatulea
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0f51918f-88c9-4930-ae5a-616bbe73e7cb@nvidia.com \
--to=dtatulea@nvidia.com \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=jasowangio@gmail.com \
--cc=linfeng.sun.dev@gmail.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox