From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
virtualization@lists.osdl.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] x86 paravirt_ops: create no_paravirt.h for native ops
Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2006 16:04:28 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1154930669.7642.12.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200608070730.17813.ak@muc.de>
On Mon, 2006-08-07 at 07:30 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > ===================================================================
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/include/asm-i386/no_paravirt.h
>
> I can't say I like the name. After all that should be the normal
> case for a long time now ... native? normal? bareiron?
Yeah, I don't like it much either. native.h doesn't say what the
alternative is. native_paravirt.h is kind of contradictory.
> Also I would prefer if you split this file up a bit - the old
> processor/system/irqflags split wasn't too bad.
In the paravirt case, they all come into one ops structure, which has to
be declared in one place.
Of course, those headers can do:
#ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT
#include <asm/paravirt.h>
#else
...
#endif
I'll try this and see what happens. Playing with the x86 headers can be
extremely hairy 8(
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Set IOPL bits in EFLAGS from given mask
> > + */
> > +static inline void set_iopl_mask(unsigned mask)
>
> This function can be completely written in C using local_save_flags()/local_restore_flags()
> Please do that. I guess it's still a good idea to keep it separated
> though because it might allow other optimizations.
>
> e.g. i've been thinking about special casing IF changes in save/restore flags
> to optimize CPUs which have slow pushf/popf. If you already make sure
> all non IF manipulations of flags are separated that would help.
...
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Clear and set 'TS' bit respectively
> > + */
>
> The comment seems out of date (no set TS)
>
>
> > +#define clts() __asm__ __volatile__ ("clts")
> > +#define read_cr0() ({ \
> > + unsigned int __dummy; \
> > + __asm__ __volatile__( \
>
> Maybe it's just me, but can't you just drop all these __s around
> asm and volatile? They are completely useless as far I know.
>
> Also the assembly will be easier readable if you just keep it on a single
> line for the simple ones.
I'm just shuffling code here, and if the other approach works, I won't
even be doing that.
But I'm happy to submit a separate patch which cleans these...
Thanks!
Rusty.
--
Help! Save Australia from the worst of the DMCA: http://linux.org.au/law
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-07 6:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-07 4:43 [PATCH 1/4] x86 paravirt_ops: create no_paravirt.h for native ops Rusty Russell
2006-08-07 4:45 ` [PATCH 2/4] x86 paravirt_ops: paravirt_desc.h for native descriptor ops Rusty Russell
2006-08-07 4:47 ` [PATCH 3/4] x86 paravirt_ops: implementation of paravirt_ops Rusty Russell
2006-08-07 4:48 ` [PATCH 4/4] x86 paravirt_ops: binary patching infrastructure Rusty Russell
2006-08-07 5:14 ` Rusty Russell
2006-08-07 5:38 ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-07 5:56 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-08-07 5:39 ` [PATCH 3/4] x86 paravirt_ops: implementation of paravirt_ops Andi Kleen
2006-08-07 5:56 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-08-07 6:13 ` Rusty Russell
2006-08-07 6:20 ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-07 7:27 ` Rusty Russell
2006-08-07 5:40 ` [PATCH 2/4] x86 paravirt_ops: paravirt_desc.h for native descriptor ops Andi Kleen
2006-08-07 7:50 ` Rusty Russell
2006-08-07 8:53 ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-07 17:19 ` Dave Jones
2006-08-07 5:22 ` [PATCH 1/4] x86 paravirt_ops: create no_paravirt.h for native ops Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-08-07 5:30 ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-07 5:43 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-08-07 6:02 ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-07 6:23 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-08-07 6:03 ` Rusty Russell
2006-08-07 6:16 ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-07 6:04 ` Rusty Russell [this message]
2006-08-07 6:17 ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-07 6:27 ` Muli Ben-Yehuda
2006-08-07 7:34 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-08-07 8:40 ` Muli Ben-Yehuda
2006-08-07 17:54 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-08-07 20:51 ` Zachary Amsden
2006-08-08 1:59 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1154930669.7642.12.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=ak@muc.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=chrisw@sous-sol.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).