From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
To: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.osdl.org,
akpm@osdl.org, nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au, frankeh@watson.ibm.com,
rhim@cc.gateh.edu
Subject: Re: [patch 1/9] Guest page hinting: unused / free pages.
Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2006 17:43:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1157125420.21733.28.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1157124821.28577.88.camel@localhost.localdomain>
On Fri, 2006-09-01 at 08:33 -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> > +++ linux-2.6-patched/mm/page_alloc.c 2006-09-01 12:49:35.000000000
> > +0200
> > @@ -515,6 +515,7 @@ static void __free_pages_ok(struct page
> > reserved += free_pages_check(page + i);
> > if (reserved)
> > return;
> > + page_set_unused(page, order);
> >
> > kernel_map_pages(page, 1 << order, 0);
> > local_irq_save(flags);
>
> Do these have anything in common with arch_free_page()? I thought
> marking the pages as being "unused by the kernel" was the whole idea of
> having that hook.
This question did come up already. arch_free_page() is done before the
PageReserved() check so it isn't suitable for stable/unused state
transitions. You can argue that arch_free_page() should be moved but who
knows what the architecture defined function is supposed to do?
page_set_stable/page_set_unused on the other hand have a clearly defined
meaning.
--
blue skies,
Martin.
Martin Schwidefsky
Linux for zSeries Development & Services
IBM Deutschland Entwicklung GmbH
"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-09-01 15:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-09-01 11:09 [patch 1/9] Guest page hinting: unused / free pages Martin Schwidefsky
2006-09-01 15:33 ` Dave Hansen
2006-09-01 15:43 ` Martin Schwidefsky [this message]
2006-09-01 15:56 ` Dave Hansen
2006-09-01 16:05 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2006-09-01 16:10 ` Dave Hansen
2006-09-12 22:47 ` Rik van Riel
2006-09-13 0:07 ` Hubertus Franke
2006-09-13 1:29 ` Rik van Riel
2006-09-13 8:56 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2006-09-13 12:06 ` Hubertus Franke
2006-09-13 12:45 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2006-09-13 13:06 ` Hubertus Franke
2006-09-13 14:45 ` Rik van Riel
2006-09-13 14:59 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2006-09-13 17:05 ` Hubertus Franke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1157125420.21733.28.camel@localhost \
--to=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=frankeh@watson.ibm.com \
--cc=haveblue@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=rhim@cc.gateh.edu \
--cc=virtualization@lists.osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).