From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Hansen Subject: Re: [patch 1/9] Guest page hinting: unused / free pages. Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2006 08:56:02 -0700 Message-ID: <1157126162.28577.104.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <20060901110908.GB15684@skybase> <1157124821.28577.88.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1157125420.21733.28.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1157125420.21733.28.camel@localhost> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.osdl.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.osdl.org To: schwidefsky@de.ibm.com Cc: akpm@osdl.org, virtualization@lists.osdl.org, frankeh@watson.ibm.com, rhim@cc.gateh.edu, nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org On Fri, 2006-09-01 at 17:43 +0200, Martin Schwidefsky wrote: > This question did come up already. arch_free_page() is done before the > PageReserved() check so it isn't suitable for stable/unused state > transitions. You can argue that arch_free_page() should be moved but who > knows what the architecture defined function is supposed to do? > page_set_stable/page_set_unused on the other hand have a clearly defined > meaning. = With a patch set this large, I think it would at least be a nice thing to go through and review the other architectures' uses. -- Dave