From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
Subject: Re: Per-cpu patches on top of PDA stuff...
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 08:54:28 -0400
Message-ID: <1158756868.9633.0.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com>
References: <1158635617.21726.8.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	<450FA6FB.9020100@goop.org>
	<1158710822.2480.14.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	<200609200900.17193.ak@muc.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <virtualization-bounces@lists.osdl.org>
In-Reply-To: <200609200900.17193.ak@muc.de>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization>,
	<mailto:virtualization-request@lists.osdl.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.osdl.org/pipermail/virtualization>
List-Post: <mailto:virtualization@lists.osdl.org>
List-Help: <mailto:virtualization-request@lists.osdl.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization>,
	<mailto:virtualization-request@lists.osdl.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.osdl.org
Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.osdl.org
To: Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, virtualization@lists.osdl.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org

On Wed, 2006-09-20 at 09:00 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> boot CPU =3D=3D 0 should be true. You just can't assume anything about its
> APIC ID, but we decouple APIC ID and logical processor id anyways.

No, it is not.  Voyager has fixed and immutable CPU IDs dependent on CPU
position in the system.  If CPU 0 is missing or logically deconfigured,
the boot CPU is definitely non zero.

James