From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
Subject: Re: Per-cpu patches on top of PDA stuff...
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 12:15:06 -0400
Message-ID: <1158768906.9633.63.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com>
References: <1158635617.21726.8.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	<450FA6FB.9020100@goop.org>
	<1158710822.2480.14.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	<200609200900.17193.ak@muc.de>
	<1158756868.9633.0.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com>
	<20060920160905.GA47657@muc.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <virtualization-bounces@lists.osdl.org>
In-Reply-To: <20060920160905.GA47657@muc.de>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization>,
	<mailto:virtualization-request@lists.osdl.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.osdl.org/pipermail/virtualization>
List-Post: <mailto:virtualization@lists.osdl.org>
List-Help: <mailto:virtualization-request@lists.osdl.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization>,
	<mailto:virtualization-request@lists.osdl.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.osdl.org
Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.osdl.org
To: Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, virtualization@lists.osdl.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org

On Wed, 2006-09-20 at 18:09 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> As APIC ID (hard_smp_processor_id()) possible, but surely not as linux lo=
gical
>  processor id (smp_processor_id()). That always starts with 0 and goes up.

Voyager is not APIC based.  The SMP hal is constructed so there's no
such thing as processor translation.  hard and soft processor IDs return
the same thing.

James