From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hollis Blanchard Subject: Re: Re: [patch 12/21] Xen-paravirt: Allocate and free vmalloc areas Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 11:26:19 -0600 Message-ID: <1171646779.20683.5.camel@basalt> References: Reply-To: Hollis Blanchard Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Keir Fraser Cc: Zachary Amsden , Jimi Xenidis , Jeremy Fitzhardinge , xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Ian Pratt , virtualization@lists.osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jan Beulich , Chris Wright , Andi Kleen , Andrew Morton , Christian Limpach List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org On Fri, 2007-02-16 at 17:10 +0000, Keir Fraser wrote: > > > On 16/2/07 16:46, "Jeremy Fitzhardinge" wrote: > > > Yes, that would work. Unfortunately that's i386 arch-specific, whereas > > the rest of this code is generic. I guess I could just move it all to > > arch/i386/mm. > > This whole thing isn't an issue on ia64 (they no-op lock_vm_area) and > powerpc doesn't use any of the Xen driver code at this time. Not sure what you mean? PowerPC uses pretty much all of the Xen driver code: event channels, blkfront/back, netfront/back, console, etc. -- Hollis Blanchard IBM Linux Technology Center