From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jamal Subject: Re: [RFC] Arp announce (for Xen) Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2007 09:08:38 -0500 Message-ID: <1172844518.4864.42.camel@localhost> References: <20070301232443.195603797@goop.org> <20070301232529.648076372@goop.org> <20070301164214.4a40bc59@freekitty> <45E7764A.7000100@goop.org> <20070301173030.754514ec@freekitty> <20070302125428.GA67405@muc.de> Reply-To: hadi@cyberus.ca Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20070302125428.GA67405@muc.de> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Andi Kleen Cc: Stephen Hemminger , Jeremy Fitzhardinge , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.osdl.org, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Chris Wright , Zachary Amsden , Rusty Russell , Ian Pratt , Christian Limpach , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Garzik List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org On Fri, 2007-02-03 at 13:54 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: > Seems like the right solution to me (if it works) I like it as well given the simple change. These are the kind of optimizations that justify offloading things to the kernel (instead of user space) i.e very little lines of code, covers a large number of user-desires, and can be turned off if you want to do something complex. _Almost_ elegant Stephen;-> cheers, jamal