From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rusty Russell Subject: Re: [RFC, PATCH 5/5] Paravirt_ops export.patch Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 09:57:13 +1000 Message-ID: <1177286233.17026.8.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <20070420015304.74394BFC@zach-dev2.vmware.com> <46284B40.5010106@goop.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: "Eric W. Biederman" Cc: Andrew Morton , Chaz Masden , Virtualization Mailing List , Petr Vandrovec , Chris Wright , Andi Kleen , Ingo Molnar List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org On Sun, 2007-04-22 at 08:28 -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > Yes. Has anyone thought more about David Miller's suggesting of just > using the linker and not doing the fancy binary replacement? > > Especially if you are beginning to reimplement the linker anyway. Nope. It doesn't do what we need. See discussion which followed it. Rusty.