From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com,
virtualization@lists.osdl.org,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: The virtuailization patches break Voyager.
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 11:13:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1177751601.7646.58.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200704281042.48440.ak@suse.de>
On Sat, 2007-04-28 at 10:42 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Saturday 28 April 2007 09:52:30 Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> > Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > > Next time I'm in a really tormenting mood I will fire up my
> > > my ibm ps2 with it's 16Mhz 386 and 6MB and verify that all is working
> > > well there.
> > >
> >
> > Well, that would be interesting. From a subarch perspective, it would
> > just be the normal default, and in theory it should work fine. But I
> > suspect the fpu emulator is probably broken, and non-WP is likely to
> > have rotted,
>
> AFAIK it's been tested occasionally on some embedded 386 systems
> (e.g. by Thomas Gleixner). Probably not with the recent changes though.
Last test was 2.6.21-rc7, where I fixed the non-WP thing. The
FP-emulator seems to work.
Which kind of breakage is new ?
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-28 9:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-28 6:40 The virtuailization patches break Voyager Eric W. Biederman
2007-04-28 6:59 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-04-28 7:25 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-04-28 7:52 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-04-28 8:32 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-04-28 8:52 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-04-28 9:34 ` Andi Kleen
2007-04-28 16:05 ` James Bottomley
2007-04-28 17:15 ` Andi Kleen
2007-04-28 8:42 ` Andi Kleen
2007-04-28 9:13 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2007-04-28 9:15 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-04-28 9:39 ` Andi Kleen
2007-04-28 9:48 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-04-28 9:15 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-04-28 9:37 ` Andi Kleen
2007-04-28 15:24 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-04-28 16:08 ` James Bottomley
2007-04-28 15:54 ` James Bottomley
2007-04-28 17:15 ` Andi Kleen
2007-04-28 16:40 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-04-28 17:00 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-04-28 17:07 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-04-28 15:47 ` James Bottomley
2007-04-28 16:02 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-04-28 16:18 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-04-28 16:20 ` James Bottomley
2007-04-28 17:23 ` Andi Kleen
2007-04-28 17:22 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1177751601.7646.58.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).