From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: The virtuailization patches break Voyager. Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 11:13:21 +0200 Message-ID: <1177751601.7646.58.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <4632FD3E.401@goop.org> <200704281042.48440.ak@suse.de> Reply-To: tglx@linutronix.de Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <200704281042.48440.ak@suse.de> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: Andi Kleen Cc: James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com, virtualization@lists.osdl.org, "Eric W. Biederman" , "H. Peter Anvin" , Andrew Morton List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org On Sat, 2007-04-28 at 10:42 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > On Saturday 28 April 2007 09:52:30 Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > > Eric W. Biederman wrote: > > > Next time I'm in a really tormenting mood I will fire up my > > > my ibm ps2 with it's 16Mhz 386 and 6MB and verify that all is working > > > well there. > > > > > > > Well, that would be interesting. From a subarch perspective, it would > > just be the normal default, and in theory it should work fine. But I > > suspect the fpu emulator is probably broken, and non-WP is likely to > > have rotted, > > AFAIK it's been tested occasionally on some embedded 386 systems > (e.g. by Thomas Gleixner). Probably not with the recent changes though. Last test was 2.6.21-rc7, where I fixed the non-WP thing. The FP-emulator seems to work. Which kind of breakage is new ? tglx