From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: The virtuailization patches break Voyager. Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 11:48:31 +0200 Message-ID: <1177753711.7646.61.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <200704281042.48440.ak@suse.de> <1177751601.7646.58.camel@localhost.localdomain> <200704281139.24959.ak@suse.de> Reply-To: tglx@linutronix.de Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <200704281139.24959.ak@suse.de> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: Andi Kleen Cc: James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com, virtualization@lists.osdl.org, "Eric W. Biederman" , "H. Peter Anvin" , Andrew Morton List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org On Sat, 2007-04-28 at 11:39 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > > Last test was 2.6.21-rc7, where I fixed the non-WP thing. The > > FP-emulator seems to work. > > > > Which kind of breakage is new ? > > Nothing known so far, but there were a lot of changes recently. It would be good > if you could retest mainline on that box once the x86 tree is merged up. I added that box to my auto test farm of bizarre hardware already, so I will notice breakage quite fast. tglx