From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rusty Russell Subject: Re: lguest over qemu Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 09:44:34 +1000 Message-ID: <1184283874.6005.812.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <21a166410707110251x574bbb13h4c8d70a7e39155c7@mail.gmail.com> <1184210340.6005.723.camel@localhost.localdomain> <21a166410707120802g705b64d4o424e1f74a876ba60@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <21a166410707120802g705b64d4o424e1f74a876ba60@mail.gmail.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: Matias Zabaljauregui Cc: virtualization@lists.osdl.org List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org On Thu, 2007-07-12 at 17:02 +0200, Matias Zabaljauregui wrote: > Rusty, > > You were right, it was the kernel configuration. Hi Matias, Any chance you could tell me what configuration option broke lguest? I should either fix it or document it... > Changing the subject, in the next month I will be studying the > possibilities of implementing the idea behind xenoprof, for lguest. > Do you think this can be useful ? > Any advice? One purpose of lguest is to demonstrate how virtualization should work, so including profiling support is useful. But the other purpose of lguest is to be simple, so it depends how simple the patch to lguest is... (Note that lguest doesn't support NMIs, but Steven has code for NMI support for lguest-x86-64 which could be ported across). Cheers! Rusty.