From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rusty Russell Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix preemptible lazy mode bug Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2007 03:48:59 +1000 Message-ID: <1189014539.10802.177.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <46CE70C8.2030005@vmware.com> <46CE8069.9070404@goop.org> <46CE81DC.90103@vmware.com> <46D9D517.6010201@goop.org> <1188850468.10802.66.camel@localhost.localdomain> <46DD60A9.8080203@goop.org> <1189010022.10802.161.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1189011909.21516.1.camel@bodhitayantram.eng.vmware.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1189011909.21516.1.camel@bodhitayantram.eng.vmware.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Zachary Amsden Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge , Linus Torvalds , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Andrew Morton , Chris Wright , stable@kernel.org, Virtualization Mailing List , Andi Kleen , Anthony Liguori List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org On Wed, 2007-09-05 at 10:05 -0700, Zachary Amsden wrote: > On Thu, 2007-09-06 at 02:33 +1000, Rusty Russell wrote: > > + BUG_ON(get_lazy_mode() && !(mode == PARAVIRT_LAZY_NONE | > > + | mode == PARAVIRT_LAZY_FLUSH)); > > That's a pretty strange line break. Sorry, should have mentioned it's completely untested: too far from my test machine 8( Thanks, Rusty.