From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: [RFC 1/3] hvc_console: rework setup to replace irq functions with callbacks (not word wrapped) Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2008 19:06:42 +1000 Message-ID: <1212570402.9496.72.camel@pasglop> References: <200806031444.21945.borntraeger@de.ibm.com> <200806031449.14385.borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Reply-To: benh@kernel.crashing.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <200806031449.14385.borntraeger@de.ibm.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linuxppc-dev-bounces+glppd-linuxppc64-dev=m.gmane.org@ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+glppd-linuxppc64-dev=m.gmane.org@ozlabs.org To: Christian Borntraeger Cc: Linux PPC devel , Jeremy Fitzhardinge , Rusty Russell , LKML , Virtualization Mailing List List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 14:49 +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > This patch tries to change hvc_console to not use request_irq/free_irq if > the backend does not use irqs. This allows virtio_console to use hvc_console > without having a linker reference to request_irq/free_irq. > > The irq specific code is moved to hvc_irq.c and selected by the drivers that > use irqs (System p, System i, XEN). > > I replaced "irq" with the opaque name "data". The request_irq and free_irq > calls are replaced with notifier_add and notifier_del. I have also changed > the code a bit to call the notifier_add and notifier_del inside the spinlock > area as the callbacks are found via hp->ops. > > Feedback is appreciated. I haven't looked at the patch proper but I agree with the basic premises. We routinely use hvc_console for things that don't have an irq. In fact, David even did a backend hooking up to udbg which is useful when bringing up weird stuffs :-) Cheers, Ben.