Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/4] xen kconfig: relax INPUT_XEN_KBDDEV_FRONTEND deps

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/4] xen kconfig: relax INPUT_XEN_KBDDEV_FRONTEND deps

[Andrew Jones]

----- Original Message -----
> Hi Andrew,
> 
> On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 10:58:06AM -0500, Andrew Jones wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > > On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 10:43:09AM +0100, Andrew Jones wrote:
> > > > PV-on-HVM guests may want to use the xen keyboard/mouse
> > > > frontend,
> > > > but
> > > > they don't use the xen frame buffer frontend. For this case it
> > > > doesn't
> > > > make much sense for INPUT_XEN_KBDDEV_FRONTEND to depend on
> > > > XEN_FBDEV_FRONTEND. The opposite direction always makes more
> > > > sense,
> > > > i.e.
> > > > if you're using xenfb, then you'll want xenkbd. Switch the
> > > > dependencies.
> > > 
> > > You need to CC as well these people that have 'maintainer' field
> > > on
> > > them:
> > > 
> > > konrad@phenom:~/work/linux$ scripts/get_maintainer.pl -f
> > > drivers/video/Kconfig
> > > Florian Tobias Schandinat <FlorianSchandinat@gmx.de>
> > > (maintainer:FRAMEBUFFER LAYER)
> > > linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org (open list:FRAMEBUFFER LAYER)
> > > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list)
> > > konrad@phenom:~/work/linux$ scripts/get_maintainer.pl -f
> > > drivers/input/misc/Kconfig
> > > Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> (maintainer:INPUT
> > > (KEYBOARD,...,commit_signer:9/16=56%)
> > > Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com> (commit_signer:3/16=19%)
> > > Anirudh Ghayal <aghayal@codeaurora.org> (commit_signer:2/16=12%)
> > > Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> (commit_signer:2/16=12%)
> > > Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com> (commit_signer:2/16=12%)
> > > linux-input@vger.kernel.org (open list:INPUT (KEYBOARD,...)
> > > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list)
> > > 
> > 
> > Thanks. Replied with them in CC.
> > 
> > Drew
> > 
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  drivers/input/misc/Kconfig |    2 +-
> > > >  drivers/video/Kconfig      |    1 +
> > > >  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/Kconfig
> > > > b/drivers/input/misc/Kconfig
> > > > index 22d875f..36c15bf 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/input/misc/Kconfig
> > > > +++ b/drivers/input/misc/Kconfig
> > > > @@ -533,7 +533,7 @@ config INPUT_CMA3000_I2C
> > > >  
> > > >  config INPUT_XEN_KBDDEV_FRONTEND
> > > >  	tristate "Xen virtual keyboard and mouse support"
> > > > -	depends on XEN_FBDEV_FRONTEND
> > > > +	depends on XEN
> 
> This is OK with me.
> 
> > > >  	default y
> > > >  	select XEN_XENBUS_FRONTEND
> > > >  	help
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/video/Kconfig b/drivers/video/Kconfig
> > > > index d83e967..269b299 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/video/Kconfig
> > > > +++ b/drivers/video/Kconfig
> > > > @@ -2269,6 +2269,7 @@ config XEN_FBDEV_FRONTEND
> > > >  	select FB_SYS_IMAGEBLIT
> > > >  	select FB_SYS_FOPS
> > > >  	select FB_DEFERRED_IO
> > > > +	select INPUT_XEN_KBDDEV_FRONTEND
> 
> But here you need to either depend on or select INPUT as select does
> not
> resolve dependencies for selected symbol.
> 

Would I actually need 'select INPUT' and select 'INPUT_MISC'? Maybe
'depends on' would just be cleaner and safer. I'll send a V2.

Thanks,
Drew


> Thanks.
> 
> --
> Dmitry
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
> 

[PATCH 2/4 v2] xen kconfig: relax INPUT_XEN_KBDDEV_FRONTEND deps

[Andrew Jones]

PV-on-HVM guests may want to use the xen keyboard/mouse frontend, but
they don't use the xen frame buffer frontend. For this case it doesn't
make much sense for INPUT_XEN_KBDDEV_FRONTEND to depend on
XEN_FBDEV_FRONTEND. The opposite direction always makes more sense, i.e.
if you're using xenfb, then you'll want xenkbd. Switch the dependencies.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/input/misc/Kconfig |    2 +-
 drivers/video/Kconfig      |    2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/Kconfig b/drivers/input/misc/Kconfig
index 22d875f..36c15bf 100644
--- a/drivers/input/misc/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/input/misc/Kconfig
@@ -533,7 +533,7 @@ config INPUT_CMA3000_I2C
 
 config INPUT_XEN_KBDDEV_FRONTEND
 	tristate "Xen virtual keyboard and mouse support"
-	depends on XEN_FBDEV_FRONTEND
+	depends on XEN
 	default y
 	select XEN_XENBUS_FRONTEND
 	help
diff --git a/drivers/video/Kconfig b/drivers/video/Kconfig
index d83e967..3e38c2f 100644
--- a/drivers/video/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/video/Kconfig
@@ -2263,7 +2263,7 @@ config FB_VIRTUAL
 
 config XEN_FBDEV_FRONTEND
 	tristate "Xen virtual frame buffer support"
-	depends on FB && XEN
+	depends on FB && XEN && INPUT_XEN_KBDDEV_FRONTEND
 	select FB_SYS_FILLRECT
 	select FB_SYS_COPYAREA
 	select FB_SYS_IMAGEBLIT
-- 
1.7.7.5

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/4 v2] xen kconfig: relax INPUT_XEN_KBDDEV_FRONTEND deps

[Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk]

On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 06:51:41PM +0100, Andrew Jones wrote:
> PV-on-HVM guests may want to use the xen keyboard/mouse frontend, but
> they don't use the xen frame buffer frontend. For this case it doesn't

Ok, but PV does?
> make much sense for INPUT_XEN_KBDDEV_FRONTEND to depend on
> XEN_FBDEV_FRONTEND. The opposite direction always makes more sense, i.e.
> if you're using xenfb, then you'll want xenkbd. Switch the dependencies.

That sounds like it would be universal irregardless if it is
PV or PVonHVM?
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
> ---
>  drivers/input/misc/Kconfig |    2 +-
>  drivers/video/Kconfig      |    2 +-
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/Kconfig b/drivers/input/misc/Kconfig
> index 22d875f..36c15bf 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/misc/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/input/misc/Kconfig
> @@ -533,7 +533,7 @@ config INPUT_CMA3000_I2C
>  
>  config INPUT_XEN_KBDDEV_FRONTEND
>  	tristate "Xen virtual keyboard and mouse support"
> -	depends on XEN_FBDEV_FRONTEND
> +	depends on XEN
>  	default y
>  	select XEN_XENBUS_FRONTEND
>  	help
> diff --git a/drivers/video/Kconfig b/drivers/video/Kconfig
> index d83e967..3e38c2f 100644
> --- a/drivers/video/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/video/Kconfig
> @@ -2263,7 +2263,7 @@ config FB_VIRTUAL
>  
>  config XEN_FBDEV_FRONTEND
>  	tristate "Xen virtual frame buffer support"
> -	depends on FB && XEN
> +	depends on FB && XEN && INPUT_XEN_KBDDEV_FRONTEND
>  	select FB_SYS_FILLRECT
>  	select FB_SYS_COPYAREA
>  	select FB_SYS_IMAGEBLIT
> -- 
> 1.7.7.5
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/4 v2] xen kconfig: relax INPUT_XEN_KBDDEV_FRONTEND deps

[Andrew Jones]

----- Original Message -----
> On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 06:51:41PM +0100, Andrew Jones wrote:
> > PV-on-HVM guests may want to use the xen keyboard/mouse frontend,
> > but
> > they don't use the xen frame buffer frontend. For this case it
> > doesn't
> 
> Ok, but PV does?
> > make much sense for INPUT_XEN_KBDDEV_FRONTEND to depend on
> > XEN_FBDEV_FRONTEND. The opposite direction always makes more sense,
> > i.e.
> > if you're using xenfb, then you'll want xenkbd. Switch the
> > dependencies.
> 
> That sounds like it would be universal irregardless if it is
> PV or PVonHVM?

This patch makes it such that if you want to use both, then you must
select both. It also says that if you want FB, then you need the
KBD. However, if you only want the KBD then you're fine with just
that. So there isn't any risk of breaking configs designed to use
FB, because FB should be manually selected for those configs anyway.

Drew

> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/input/misc/Kconfig |    2 +-
> >  drivers/video/Kconfig      |    2 +-
> >  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/Kconfig
> > b/drivers/input/misc/Kconfig
> > index 22d875f..36c15bf 100644
> > --- a/drivers/input/misc/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/input/misc/Kconfig
> > @@ -533,7 +533,7 @@ config INPUT_CMA3000_I2C
> >  
> >  config INPUT_XEN_KBDDEV_FRONTEND
> >  	tristate "Xen virtual keyboard and mouse support"
> > -	depends on XEN_FBDEV_FRONTEND
> > +	depends on XEN
> >  	default y
> >  	select XEN_XENBUS_FRONTEND
> >  	help
> > diff --git a/drivers/video/Kconfig b/drivers/video/Kconfig
> > index d83e967..3e38c2f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/video/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/video/Kconfig
> > @@ -2263,7 +2263,7 @@ config FB_VIRTUAL
> >  
> >  config XEN_FBDEV_FRONTEND
> >  	tristate "Xen virtual frame buffer support"
> > -	depends on FB && XEN
> > +	depends on FB && XEN && INPUT_XEN_KBDDEV_FRONTEND
> >  	select FB_SYS_FILLRECT
> >  	select FB_SYS_COPYAREA
> >  	select FB_SYS_IMAGEBLIT
> > --
> > 1.7.7.5
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Xen-devel mailing list
> > Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
> 

[PATCH 2/4 v2] xen kconfig: relax INPUT_XEN_KBDDEV_FRONTEND deps

[Andrew Jones]

PV-on-HVM guests may want to use the xen keyboard/mouse frontend, but
they don't use the xen frame buffer frontend. For this case it doesn't
make much sense for INPUT_XEN_KBDDEV_FRONTEND to depend on
XEN_FBDEV_FRONTEND. The opposite direction always makes more sense, i.e.
if you're using xenfb, then you'll want xenkbd. Switch the dependencies.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/input/misc/Kconfig |    2 +-
 drivers/video/Kconfig      |    2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/Kconfig b/drivers/input/misc/Kconfig
index 22d875f..36c15bf 100644
--- a/drivers/input/misc/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/input/misc/Kconfig
@@ -533,7 +533,7 @@ config INPUT_CMA3000_I2C
 
 config INPUT_XEN_KBDDEV_FRONTEND
 	tristate "Xen virtual keyboard and mouse support"
-	depends on XEN_FBDEV_FRONTEND
+	depends on XEN
 	default y
 	select XEN_XENBUS_FRONTEND
 	help
diff --git a/drivers/video/Kconfig b/drivers/video/Kconfig
index d83e967..3e38c2f 100644
--- a/drivers/video/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/video/Kconfig
@@ -2263,7 +2263,7 @@ config FB_VIRTUAL
 
 config XEN_FBDEV_FRONTEND
 	tristate "Xen virtual frame buffer support"
-	depends on FB && XEN
+	depends on FB && XEN && INPUT_XEN_KBDDEV_FRONTEND
 	select FB_SYS_FILLRECT
 	select FB_SYS_COPYAREA
 	select FB_SYS_IMAGEBLIT
-- 
1.7.7.5

Re: [PATCH 2/4 v2] xen kconfig: relax INPUT_XEN_KBDDEV_FRONTEND deps

[Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk]

On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 05:36:39PM +0100, Andrew Jones wrote:
> PV-on-HVM guests may want to use the xen keyboard/mouse frontend, but
> they don't use the xen frame buffer frontend. For this case it doesn't
> make much sense for INPUT_XEN_KBDDEV_FRONTEND to depend on
> XEN_FBDEV_FRONTEND. The opposite direction always makes more sense, i.e.

What is the disadvantege of keeping it as is?

> if you're using xenfb, then you'll want xenkbd. Switch the dependencies.
> 
You are missing the CC to the proper maintainer.

Also, did you test this with PV and PVonHVM guests?

> Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
> ---
>  drivers/input/misc/Kconfig |    2 +-
>  drivers/video/Kconfig      |    2 +-
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/Kconfig b/drivers/input/misc/Kconfig
> index 22d875f..36c15bf 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/misc/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/input/misc/Kconfig
> @@ -533,7 +533,7 @@ config INPUT_CMA3000_I2C
>  
>  config INPUT_XEN_KBDDEV_FRONTEND
>  	tristate "Xen virtual keyboard and mouse support"
> -	depends on XEN_FBDEV_FRONTEND
> +	depends on XEN
>  	default y
>  	select XEN_XENBUS_FRONTEND
>  	help
> diff --git a/drivers/video/Kconfig b/drivers/video/Kconfig
> index d83e967..3e38c2f 100644
> --- a/drivers/video/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/video/Kconfig
> @@ -2263,7 +2263,7 @@ config FB_VIRTUAL
>  
>  config XEN_FBDEV_FRONTEND
>  	tristate "Xen virtual frame buffer support"
> -	depends on FB && XEN
> +	depends on FB && XEN && INPUT_XEN_KBDDEV_FRONTEND
>  	select FB_SYS_FILLRECT
>  	select FB_SYS_COPYAREA
>  	select FB_SYS_IMAGEBLIT
> -- 
> 1.7.7.5

Re: [PATCH 2/4 v2] xen kconfig: relax INPUT_XEN_KBDDEV_FRONTEND deps

[Andrew Jones]

----- Original Message -----
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 05:36:39PM +0100, Andrew Jones wrote:
> > PV-on-HVM guests may want to use the xen keyboard/mouse frontend,
> > but
> > they don't use the xen frame buffer frontend. For this case it
> > doesn't
> > make much sense for INPUT_XEN_KBDDEV_FRONTEND to depend on
> > XEN_FBDEV_FRONTEND. The opposite direction always makes more sense,
> > i.e.
> 
> What is the disadvantege of keeping it as is?

If you don't want FB, but you do want KBD, then you're stuck with FB
anyway, even though it isn't necessary. Perhaps I'm the only one who
ever considering building a config without FB?

> 
> > if you're using xenfb, then you'll want xenkbd. Switch the
> > dependencies.
> > 
> You are missing the CC to the proper maintainer.
> 

I added them the last time you reminded me. See the following
message-ids for the thread where this patch was discussed and then
led to the V2 here.

20120109075911.GA4049@core.coreip.homeip.net
725950ad-d5cf-4ddb-9870-a5c8d75cfa51@zmail13.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com
1326131501-9610-1-git-send-email-drjones@redhat.com

I've re-added them to this thread, since the multiple
posting/reposting must have lost them again.

> Also, did you test this with PV and PVonHVM guests?

Testing-wise you don't really need to do much more then
'make oldconfig'. FB doesn't work on pv-on-hvm, the mod wouldn't
even init if you tried as there's a

        if (!xen_pv_domain())
                return -ENODEV;

I have tested a pv-on-hvm guest after this patch with FB off though,
which worked. For PV guests using FB, they'll work the same, as you
wouldn't want to change your config.

Drew

> 
> > Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/input/misc/Kconfig |    2 +-
> >  drivers/video/Kconfig      |    2 +-
> >  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/Kconfig
> > b/drivers/input/misc/Kconfig
> > index 22d875f..36c15bf 100644
> > --- a/drivers/input/misc/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/input/misc/Kconfig
> > @@ -533,7 +533,7 @@ config INPUT_CMA3000_I2C
> >  
> >  config INPUT_XEN_KBDDEV_FRONTEND
> >  	tristate "Xen virtual keyboard and mouse support"
> > -	depends on XEN_FBDEV_FRONTEND
> > +	depends on XEN
> >  	default y
> >  	select XEN_XENBUS_FRONTEND
> >  	help
> > diff --git a/drivers/video/Kconfig b/drivers/video/Kconfig
> > index d83e967..3e38c2f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/video/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/video/Kconfig
> > @@ -2263,7 +2263,7 @@ config FB_VIRTUAL
> >  
> >  config XEN_FBDEV_FRONTEND
> >  	tristate "Xen virtual frame buffer support"
> > -	depends on FB && XEN
> > +	depends on FB && XEN && INPUT_XEN_KBDDEV_FRONTEND
> >  	select FB_SYS_FILLRECT
> >  	select FB_SYS_COPYAREA
> >  	select FB_SYS_IMAGEBLIT
> > --
> > 1.7.7.5
> 

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/4 v2] xen kconfig: relax INPUT_XEN_KBDDEV_FRONTEND deps

[Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk]

On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 11:29:20AM -0500, Andrew Jones wrote:
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> > On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 06:51:41PM +0100, Andrew Jones wrote:
> > > PV-on-HVM guests may want to use the xen keyboard/mouse frontend,
> > > but
> > > they don't use the xen frame buffer frontend. For this case it
> > > doesn't
> > 
> > Ok, but PV does?
> > > make much sense for INPUT_XEN_KBDDEV_FRONTEND to depend on
> > > XEN_FBDEV_FRONTEND. The opposite direction always makes more sense,
> > > i.e.
> > > if you're using xenfb, then you'll want xenkbd. Switch the
> > > dependencies.
> > 
> > That sounds like it would be universal irregardless if it is
> > PV or PVonHVM?
> 
> This patch makes it such that if you want to use both, then you must
> select both. It also says that if you want FB, then you need the
> KBD. However, if you only want the KBD then you're fine with just
> that. So there isn't any risk of breaking configs designed to use
> FB, because FB should be manually selected for those configs anyway.

Dmitry,

I am OK with this patch. Should I pick it up on my tree for 3.4 or
are you OK doing it via your tree?

Thanks!
> 
> Drew
> 
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/input/misc/Kconfig |    2 +-
> > >  drivers/video/Kconfig      |    2 +-
> > >  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/Kconfig
> > > b/drivers/input/misc/Kconfig
> > > index 22d875f..36c15bf 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/input/misc/Kconfig
> > > +++ b/drivers/input/misc/Kconfig
> > > @@ -533,7 +533,7 @@ config INPUT_CMA3000_I2C
> > >  
> > >  config INPUT_XEN_KBDDEV_FRONTEND
> > >  	tristate "Xen virtual keyboard and mouse support"
> > > -	depends on XEN_FBDEV_FRONTEND
> > > +	depends on XEN
> > >  	default y
> > >  	select XEN_XENBUS_FRONTEND
> > >  	help
> > > diff --git a/drivers/video/Kconfig b/drivers/video/Kconfig
> > > index d83e967..3e38c2f 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/video/Kconfig
> > > +++ b/drivers/video/Kconfig
> > > @@ -2263,7 +2263,7 @@ config FB_VIRTUAL
> > >  
> > >  config XEN_FBDEV_FRONTEND
> > >  	tristate "Xen virtual frame buffer support"
> > > -	depends on FB && XEN
> > > +	depends on FB && XEN && INPUT_XEN_KBDDEV_FRONTEND
> > >  	select FB_SYS_FILLRECT
> > >  	select FB_SYS_COPYAREA
> > >  	select FB_SYS_IMAGEBLIT
> > > --
> > > 1.7.7.5
> > > 
> > > 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Xen-devel mailing list
> > > Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> > > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
> > 

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/4 v2] xen kconfig: relax INPUT_XEN_KBDDEV_FRONTEND deps

[Dmitry Torokhov]

On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 01:23:05PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 11:29:20AM -0500, Andrew Jones wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > > On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 06:51:41PM +0100, Andrew Jones wrote:
> > > > PV-on-HVM guests may want to use the xen keyboard/mouse frontend,
> > > > but
> > > > they don't use the xen frame buffer frontend. For this case it
> > > > doesn't
> > > 
> > > Ok, but PV does?
> > > > make much sense for INPUT_XEN_KBDDEV_FRONTEND to depend on
> > > > XEN_FBDEV_FRONTEND. The opposite direction always makes more sense,
> > > > i.e.
> > > > if you're using xenfb, then you'll want xenkbd. Switch the
> > > > dependencies.
> > > 
> > > That sounds like it would be universal irregardless if it is
> > > PV or PVonHVM?
> > 
> > This patch makes it such that if you want to use both, then you must
> > select both. It also says that if you want FB, then you need the
> > KBD. However, if you only want the KBD then you're fine with just
> > that. So there isn't any risk of breaking configs designed to use
> > FB, because FB should be manually selected for those configs anyway.
> 
> Dmitry,
> 
> I am OK with this patch. Should I pick it up on my tree for 3.4 or
> are you OK doing it via your tree?

Konrad,

I don't have a good copy of the patch so it you could pick it up that
would be great.

Thanks.

-- 
Dmitry

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/4 v2] xen kconfig: relax INPUT_XEN_KBDDEV_FRONTEND deps

[Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk]

On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 11:24:28PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 01:23:05PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 11:29:20AM -0500, Andrew Jones wrote:
> > > 
> > > 
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 06:51:41PM +0100, Andrew Jones wrote:
> > > > > PV-on-HVM guests may want to use the xen keyboard/mouse frontend,
> > > > > but
> > > > > they don't use the xen frame buffer frontend. For this case it
> > > > > doesn't
> > > > 
> > > > Ok, but PV does?
> > > > > make much sense for INPUT_XEN_KBDDEV_FRONTEND to depend on
> > > > > XEN_FBDEV_FRONTEND. The opposite direction always makes more sense,
> > > > > i.e.
> > > > > if you're using xenfb, then you'll want xenkbd. Switch the
> > > > > dependencies.
> > > > 
> > > > That sounds like it would be universal irregardless if it is
> > > > PV or PVonHVM?
> > > 
> > > This patch makes it such that if you want to use both, then you must
> > > select both. It also says that if you want FB, then you need the
> > > KBD. However, if you only want the KBD then you're fine with just
> > > that. So there isn't any risk of breaking configs designed to use
> > > FB, because FB should be manually selected for those configs anyway.
> > 
> > Dmitry,
> > 
> > I am OK with this patch. Should I pick it up on my tree for 3.4 or
> > are you OK doing it via your tree?
> 
> Konrad,
> 
> I don't have a good copy of the patch so it you could pick it up that
> would be great.

OK, will stick you Ack on it. Thx!
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> -- 
> Dmitry
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel