From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] tcm_vhost/virtio-scsi WIP code for-3.6 Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2012 20:13:56 -0700 Message-ID: <1341544436.23954.296.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org> References: <1341375846-27882-1-git-send-email-nab@linux-iscsi.org> <20120704140259.GB26485@redhat.com> <4FF45890.6000205@redhat.com> <20120704150557.GA26951@redhat.com> <1341453665.23954.224.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org> <20120705093113.GC29373@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20120705093113.GC29373@redhat.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: Jens Axboe , Stefan Hajnoczi , kvm-devel , lf-virt , Anthony Liguori , target-devel , linux-scsi , Paolo Bonzini , Zhi Yong Wu , Christoph Hellwig List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org On Thu, 2012-07-05 at 12:31 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 07:01:05PM -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > > On Wed, 2012-07-04 at 18:05 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > I was talking about 4/6 first of all. > > > > So yeah, this code is still considered RFC at this point for-3.6, but > > I'd like to get this into target-pending/for-next in next week for more > > feedback and start collecting signoffs for the necessary pieces that > > effect existing vhost code. > > > > By that time the cmwq conversion of tcm_vhost should be in place as > > well.. > > I'll try to give some feedback but I think we do need > to see the qemu patches - they weren't posted yet, were they? > This driver has some userspace interface and once > that is merged it has to be supported. > So I think we need the buy-in from the qemu side at the principal level. > Stefan posted the QEMU vhost-scsi patches a few items, but I think it's been awhile since the last round of review. For the recent development's with tcm_vhost, I've been using Zhi's QEMU tree here: https://github.com/wuzhy/qemu/tree/vhost-scsi Other than a few printf I added to help me understand how it works, no function changes have been made to work with target-pending/tcm_vhost. Thank you, --nab