From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" Subject: Re: [RFC-v2 0/4] tcm_vhost+cmwq fabric driver code for-3.6 Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 15:04:42 -0700 Message-ID: <1342562682.18004.482.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org> References: <1342041304-29728-1-git-send-email-nab@linux-iscsi.org> <20120717150548.GA11587@redhat.com> <1342559842.18004.440.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org> <20120717215848.GD1868@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20120717215848.GD1868@redhat.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: Jens Axboe , Stefan Hajnoczi , kvm-devel , Zhi Yong Wu , Anthony Liguori , target-devel , linux-scsi , Paolo Bonzini , lf-virt , Christoph Hellwig List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org On Wed, 2012-07-18 at 00:58 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 02:17:22PM -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > > Wrt to staging, I'd like to avoid mucking with staging because: > > > > *) The code has been posted for review > > *) The code has been converted to use the latest target-core primitives > > *) The code does not require cleanups between staging -> merge > > *) The code has been stable the last 7 days since RFC-v2 with heavy > > BTW I don't suggest putting code itself in staging. Just the config > flag to enable it. Once we are more or less sure multiple userspaces > are using this driver, we'll move the config hopefully already in 3.7. > What's the downside? > Ahh, sorry I managed to miss that part.. ;) If it's just a CONFIG_STAGING flag for a release or two until we work out the userspace bits, I don't have an objection doing something like that if it helps getting the code exposed to a large set of eyes in mainline. --nab