From: Heinz Graalfs <graalfs@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: mst@redhat.com, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Cc: borntraeger@de.ibm.com
Subject: [PATCH v3 RFC 3/4] virtio_blk: avoid calling blk_cleanup_queue() on device loss
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 11:32:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1385548360-31943-4-git-send-email-graalfs@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1385548360-31943-1-git-send-email-graalfs@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Code is added to avoid calling blk_cleanup_queue() when the surprize_removal
flag is set due to a disappeared device. It avoid hangs due to incomplete
requests (e.g. in-flight requests). Such requests must be considered as lost.
If the current remove callback was triggered due to an unregister driver,
and the surprize_removal is not already set (although the actual device
is already gone, e.g. virsh detach), blk_cleanup_queue() would be triggered
resulting in a possible hang. This hang is caused by e.g. 'in-flight' requests
that will never complete. This is a weird situation, and most likely not
'serializable'.
Signed-off-by: Heinz Graalfs <graalfs@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
drivers/block/virtio_blk.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
index 0f64282..8c05001 100644
--- a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
+++ b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
@@ -892,7 +892,8 @@ static void virtblk_remove(struct virtio_device *vdev)
}
del_gendisk(vblk->disk);
- blk_cleanup_queue(vblk->disk->queue);
+ if (!vdev->surprize_removal)
+ blk_cleanup_queue(vblk->disk->queue);
/* Stop all the virtqueues. */
vdev->config->reset(vdev);
--
1.8.3.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-27 10:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-27 10:32 [PATCH v3 RFC 0/4] virtio: add 'surprize_removal' to virtio_device Heinz Graalfs
2013-11-27 10:32 ` [PATCH v3 RFC 1/4] virtio: add surprize_removal " Heinz Graalfs
2013-11-27 10:32 ` [PATCH v3 RFC 2/4] virtio_blk: avoid further request queueing on device loss Heinz Graalfs
2013-12-04 4:04 ` Rusty Russell
2013-11-27 10:32 ` Heinz Graalfs [this message]
2013-11-27 10:47 ` [PATCH v3 RFC 3/4] virtio_blk: avoid calling blk_cleanup_queue() " Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-11-27 11:37 ` Heinz Graalfs
2013-11-27 12:28 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-11-27 12:49 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-11-27 14:15 ` Heinz Graalfs
2013-11-27 14:37 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-11-27 10:32 ` [PATCH v3 RFC 4/4] virtio_ccw: set surprize_removal in virtio_device if a device was lost Heinz Graalfs
2013-11-27 10:49 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1385548360-31943-4-git-send-email-graalfs@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=graalfs@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).