virtualization.lists.linux-foundation.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alok Kataria <akataria@vmware.com>
To: "jgross@suse.com" <jgross@suse.com>
Cc: "x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org"
	<virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"hpa@zytor.com" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
	"boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com" <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
	"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/11] vmware: set cpu capabilities during platform initialization
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 10:29:27 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1492079789.5342.0.camel@vmware.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170413101116.723-11-jgross@suse.com>


On Thu, 2017-04-13 at 12:11 +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
> There is no need to set the same capabilities for each cpu
> individually. This can be done for all cpus in platform initialization.

Looks reasonable to me.
Acked-by: Alok Kataria <akataria@vmware.com>

Thanks,
Alok

> 
> Cc: Alok Kataria <akataria@vmware.com>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
> Cc: x86@kernel.org
> Cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
> Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/vmware.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/vmware.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/vmware.c
> index 22403a28caf5..40ed26852ebd 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/vmware.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/vmware.c
> @@ -113,6 +113,24 @@ static void __init vmware_paravirt_ops_setup(void)
>  #define vmware_paravirt_ops_setup() do {} while (0)
>  #endif
>  
> +/*
> + * VMware hypervisor takes care of exporting a reliable TSC to the guest.
> + * Still, due to timing difference when running on virtual cpus, the TSC can
> + * be marked as unstable in some cases. For example, the TSC sync check at
> + * bootup can fail due to a marginal offset between vcpus' TSCs (though the
> + * TSCs do not drift from each other).  Also, the ACPI PM timer clocksource
> + * is not suitable as a watchdog when running on a hypervisor because the
> + * kernel may miss a wrap of the counter if the vcpu is descheduled for a
> + * long time. To skip these checks at runtime we set these capability bits,
> + * so that the kernel could just trust the hypervisor with providing a
> + * reliable virtual TSC that is suitable for timekeeping.
> + */
> +static void __init vmware_set_capabilities(void)
> +{
> +	setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC);
> +	setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_TSC_RELIABLE);
> +}
> +
>  static void __init vmware_platform_setup(void)
>  {
>  	uint32_t eax, ebx, ecx, edx;
> @@ -152,6 +170,8 @@ static void __init vmware_platform_setup(void)
>  #ifdef CONFIG_X86_IO_APIC
>  	no_timer_check = 1;
>  #endif
> +
> +	vmware_set_capabilities();
>  }
>  
>  /*
> @@ -176,24 +196,6 @@ static uint32_t __init vmware_platform(void)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -/*
> - * VMware hypervisor takes care of exporting a reliable TSC to the guest.
> - * Still, due to timing difference when running on virtual cpus, the TSC can
> - * be marked as unstable in some cases. For example, the TSC sync check at
> - * bootup can fail due to a marginal offset between vcpus' TSCs (though the
> - * TSCs do not drift from each other).  Also, the ACPI PM timer clocksource
> - * is not suitable as a watchdog when running on a hypervisor because the
> - * kernel may miss a wrap of the counter if the vcpu is descheduled for a
> - * long time. To skip these checks at runtime we set these capability bits,
> - * so that the kernel could just trust the hypervisor with providing a
> - * reliable virtual TSC that is suitable for timekeeping.
> - */
> -static void vmware_set_cpu_features(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
> -{
> -	set_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC);
> -	set_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_TSC_RELIABLE);
> -}
> -
>  /* Checks if hypervisor supports x2apic without VT-D interrupt remapping. */
>  static bool __init vmware_legacy_x2apic_available(void)
>  {
> @@ -206,7 +208,6 @@ static bool __init vmware_legacy_x2apic_available(void)
>  const __refconst struct hypervisor_x86 x86_hyper_vmware = {
>  	.name			= "VMware",
>  	.detect			= vmware_platform,
> -	.set_cpu_features	= vmware_set_cpu_features,
>  	.init_platform		= vmware_platform_setup,
>  	.x2apic_available	= vmware_legacy_x2apic_available,
>  };

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-04-13 10:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20170413101116.723-1-jgross@suse.com>
2017-04-13 10:11 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] vmware: set cpu capabilities during platform initialization Juergen Gross
     [not found] ` <20170413101116.723-11-jgross@suse.com>
2017-04-13 10:29   ` Alok Kataria [this message]
2017-04-13 13:39 ` [PATCH v2 00/11] x86: xen cpuid() cleanup Boris Ostrovsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1492079789.5342.0.camel@vmware.com \
    --to=akataria@vmware.com \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).