From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Cc: cohuck@redhat.com, mst@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH] [RFC] virtio: Limit the retries on a virtio device reset
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2017 18:33:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1503505982-29568-1-git-send-email-pmorel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
Reseting a device can sometime fail, even a virtual device.
If the device is not reseted after a while the driver should
abandon the retries.
This is the change proposed for the modern virtio_pci.
More generally, when this happens,the virtio driver can set the
VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_FAILED status flag to advertise the caller.
The virtio core can test if the reset was succesful by testing
this flag after a reset.
This behavior is backward compatible with existing drivers.
This behavior seems to me compatible with Virtio-1.0 specifications,
Chapters 2.1 Device Status Field.
There I definitively need your opinion: Is it right?
This patch also lead to another question:
do we care if a device provided by the hypervisor is buggy?
Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
drivers/virtio/virtio.c | 4 ++++
drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern.c | 11 ++++++++++-
2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio.c
index 48230a5..6255dc4 100644
--- a/drivers/virtio/virtio.c
+++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio.c
@@ -324,6 +324,8 @@ int register_virtio_device(struct virtio_device *dev)
/* We always start by resetting the device, in case a previous
* driver messed it up. This also tests that code path a little. */
dev->config->reset(dev);
+ if (dev->config->get_status(dev) & VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_FAILED)
+ return -EIO;
/* Acknowledge that we've seen the device. */
virtio_add_status(dev, VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_ACKNOWLEDGE);
@@ -373,6 +375,8 @@ int virtio_device_restore(struct virtio_device *dev)
/* We always start by resetting the device, in case a previous
* driver messed it up. */
dev->config->reset(dev);
+ if (dev->config->get_status(dev) & VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_FAILED)
+ return -EIO;
/* Acknowledge that we've seen the device. */
virtio_add_status(dev, VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_ACKNOWLEDGE);
diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern.c
index 2555d80..bfc5fc1 100644
--- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern.c
+++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern.c
@@ -270,6 +270,7 @@ static void vp_set_status(struct virtio_device *vdev, u8 status)
static void vp_reset(struct virtio_device *vdev)
{
struct virtio_pci_device *vp_dev = to_vp_device(vdev);
+ int retry_count = 10;
/* 0 status means a reset. */
vp_iowrite8(0, &vp_dev->common->device_status);
/* After writing 0 to device_status, the driver MUST wait for a read of
@@ -277,8 +278,16 @@ static void vp_reset(struct virtio_device *vdev)
* This will flush out the status write, and flush in device writes,
* including MSI-X interrupts, if any.
*/
- while (vp_ioread8(&vp_dev->common->device_status))
+ while (vp_ioread8(&vp_dev->common->device_status) && retry_count--)
msleep(1);
+ /* If the read did not return 0 before the timeout consider that
+ * the device failed.
+ */
+ if (retry_count <= 0) {
+ virtio_add_status(vdev, VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_FAILED);
+ return;
+ }
+ virtio_add_status(vdev, VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_ACKNOWLEDGE);
/* Flush pending VQ/configuration callbacks. */
vp_synchronize_vectors(vdev);
}
--
2.3.0
next reply other threads:[~2017-08-23 16:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-23 16:33 Pierre Morel [this message]
2017-08-24 11:07 ` [PATCH] [RFC] virtio: Limit the retries on a virtio device reset Cornelia Huck
2017-08-24 12:16 ` Pierre Morel
2017-08-24 14:12 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-08-24 17:07 ` Pierre Morel
2017-08-24 21:16 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-08-25 8:26 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-08-25 11:21 ` Pierre Morel
2017-08-25 16:43 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-08-24 14:19 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-08-24 17:42 ` Pierre Morel
2017-08-24 21:23 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-08-25 8:33 ` Pierre Morel
2017-08-25 16:46 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1503505982-29568-1-git-send-email-pmorel@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=pmorel@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).