virtualization.lists.linux-foundation.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Heng Qi <hengqi@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Daniel Jurgens <danielj@nvidia.com>
Cc: <mst@redhat.com>, <jasowang@redhat.com>,
	<xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>, <virtualization@lists.linux.dev>,
	<davem@davemloft.net>, <edumazet@google.com>, <kuba@kernel.org>,
	<pabeni@redhat.com>, <jiri@nvidia.com>,
	Daniel Jurgens <danielj@nvidia.com>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 0/6] Remove RTNL lock protection of CVQ
Date: Mon, 6 May 2024 14:16:12 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1714976172.0470116-1-hengqi@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240503202445.1415560-1-danielj@nvidia.com>

On Fri, 3 May 2024 23:24:39 +0300, Daniel Jurgens <danielj@nvidia.com> wrote:
> Currently the buffer used for control VQ commands is protected by the
> RTNL lock. Previously this wasn't a major concern because the control VQ
> was only used during device setup and user interaction. With the recent
> addition of dynamic interrupt moderation the control VQ may be used
> frequently during normal operation.
> 
> This series removes the RNTL lock dependency by introducing a mutex
> to protect the control buffer and writing SGs to the control VQ.
> 

For the series, keep tags:

Reviewed-by: Heng Qi <hengqi@linux.alibaba.com>
Tested-by: Heng Qi <hengqi@linux.alibaba.com>


> v6:
> 	- Rebased over new stats code.
> 	- Added comment to cvq_lock, init the mutex unconditionally,
> 	  and replaced some duplicate code with a goto.
> 	- Fixed minor grammer errors, checkpatch warnings, and clarified
> 	  a comment.
> v5:
> 	- Changed cvq_lock to a mutex.
> 	- Changed dim_lock to mutex, because it's held taking
> 	  the cvq_lock.
> 	- Use spin/mutex_lock/unlock vs guard macros.
> v4:
> 	- Protect dim_enabled with same lock as well intr_coal.
> 	- Rename intr_coal_lock to dim_lock.
> 	- Remove some scoped_guard where the error path doesn't
> 	  have to be in the lock.
> v3:
> 	- Changed type of _offloads to __virtio16 to fix static
> 	  analysis warning.
> 	- Moved a misplaced hunk to the correct patch.
> v2:
> 	- New patch to only process the provided queue in
> 	  virtnet_dim_work
> 	- New patch to lock per queue rx coalescing structure.
> 
> Daniel Jurgens (6):
>   virtio_net: Store RSS setting in virtnet_info
>   virtio_net: Remove command data from control_buf
>   virtio_net: Add a lock for the command VQ.
>   virtio_net: Do DIM update for specified queue only
>   virtio_net: Add a lock for per queue RX coalesce
>   virtio_net: Remove rtnl lock protection of command buffers
> 
>  drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 288 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
>  1 file changed, 173 insertions(+), 115 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> 2.44.0
> 
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-05-06  6:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-03 20:24 [PATCH net-next v6 0/6] Remove RTNL lock protection of CVQ Daniel Jurgens
2024-05-03 20:24 ` [PATCH net-next v6 1/6] virtio_net: Store RSS setting in virtnet_info Daniel Jurgens
2024-05-03 20:24 ` [PATCH net-next v6 2/6] virtio_net: Remove command data from control_buf Daniel Jurgens
2024-05-15 12:44   ` Eric Dumazet
2024-05-15 13:27     ` Dan Jurgens
2024-05-03 20:24 ` [PATCH net-next v6 3/6] virtio_net: Add a lock for the command VQ Daniel Jurgens
2024-05-03 20:24 ` [PATCH net-next v6 4/6] virtio_net: Do DIM update for specified queue only Daniel Jurgens
2024-05-03 20:24 ` [PATCH net-next v6 5/6] virtio_net: Add a lock for per queue RX coalesce Daniel Jurgens
2024-05-03 20:24 ` [PATCH net-next v6 6/6] virtio_net: Remove rtnl lock protection of command buffers Daniel Jurgens
2024-05-06  6:16 ` Heng Qi [this message]
2024-05-07  6:29   ` [PATCH net-next v6 0/6] Remove RTNL lock protection of CVQ Jason Wang
2024-05-07 10:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1714976172.0470116-1-hengqi@linux.alibaba.com \
    --to=hengqi@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=danielj@nvidia.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=jiri@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).