From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37578B672; Tue, 13 May 2025 22:09:57 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747174198; cv=none; b=Qtsi82zcNnk5jUMKQRtV+CZseYQj6pUWsONyPIf4WyxWm6e4WcJGYlwJ+iR348pZlGh1HcREoDgISJKQDab0rL3yx9elYBHClVH5DORqPTTF+kkzJ+vzGZR/UEWggVKJ/547CbgMHIrvUMyUiGvAA9P4JwRINXJNGIRebQK0Oxk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747174198; c=relaxed/simple; bh=CuoB0qR21auBIS7t8r+wUd5t5czoU7L/4n2tHTDAVMY=; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Subject:From:Message-Id:Date:References: In-Reply-To:To:Cc; b=euHfynTFZo/gTMU+04VKWmWkpqo+daWM2WDwq3ojIQbJe0oBIeeyO3w4zbVV6FH4E6XgHoCwaQQ4NByfvN1LBXx28S0Q7r2Cng9XL4/NPnjdwU34TXXYnEl+h2rCHObswBdLC6WpQh5Uc/haLb/D/tsa5z/74l+NWRwooGJBLxg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=NX0zv1U9; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="NX0zv1U9" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B8FF5C4CEE4; Tue, 13 May 2025 22:09:57 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1747174197; bh=CuoB0qR21auBIS7t8r+wUd5t5czoU7L/4n2tHTDAVMY=; h=Subject:From:Date:References:In-Reply-To:To:Cc:From; b=NX0zv1U9qLOYcC5F1x5pkTC1jQTpAa3hQpPn+Kg6LcAKwAv8cBvRYyrCwNaPFC4pK pIwdJrXwcJeb0atAGMVwWVnI78aELEOysxZmLMTJGqLWu6uFQ8dOeLCZlP4Ss0VB1/ 0jQiOs4C5fy+0dazakyEt8zegNCHCBKHaIpPpsslKeDzJRmVZWkZW6d7hrJqx6k7Zl MgGPx218VJq8gRS7L3sMtYV1+eK36zwIchYDX7CKybnwm/FLxuviBoc7wXvfBLvtkR bDP0hsFz2D6gtWQSHnX/cXIojIgHvAPCpTQnpIxm9enkBppCn5v4J8LvNJlwcWAsXs ct9YJbyi1XTtQ== Received: from [10.30.226.235] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by aws-us-west-2-korg-oddjob-rhel9-1.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 710A4380DBE8; Tue, 13 May 2025 22:10:36 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: virtualization@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] vsock/test: Fix occasional failure in SIOCOUTQ tests From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org Message-Id: <174717423527.1805570.13155176594875742702.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> Date: Tue, 13 May 2025 22:10:35 +0000 References: <20250507151456.2577061-1-kshk@linux.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <20250507151456.2577061-1-kshk@linux.ibm.com> To: Konstantin Shkolnyy Cc: sgarzare@redhat.com, virtualization@lists.linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mjrosato@linux.ibm.com Hello: This patch was applied to netdev/net.git (main) by Jakub Kicinski : On Wed, 7 May 2025 10:14:56 -0500 you wrote: > These tests: > "SOCK_STREAM ioctl(SIOCOUTQ) 0 unsent bytes" > "SOCK_SEQPACKET ioctl(SIOCOUTQ) 0 unsent bytes" > output: "Unexpected 'SIOCOUTQ' value, expected 0, got 64 (CLIENT)". > > They test that the SIOCOUTQ ioctl reports 0 unsent bytes after the data > have been received by the other side. However, sometimes there is a delay > in updating this "unsent bytes" counter, and the test fails even though > the counter properly goes to 0 several milliseconds later. > > [...] Here is the summary with links: - [net,v2] vsock/test: Fix occasional failure in SIOCOUTQ tests https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/7fd7ad6f36af You are awesome, thank you! -- Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot. https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html