Re: [PATCH RFC v2 2/2] virtio-net: support receive timestamp

[Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>]

On Thu, 29 Jan 2026 11:08:27 +0100, Steffen Trumtrar <s.trumtrar@pengutronix.de> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 2026-01-29 at 17:48 +08, Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
> >
> > Since patch #1 used this struct, this one should be placed first in the series.
>
> oh, you are right, the order should be the other way around.
>
> > Also, has the virtio specification process accepted such a draft proposal?
>
> I haven't sent the draft yet, because I'm unsure if I understood the way this should be implemented with the flow filter correctly.
> If the direction is correct, I'd try and get the specification process going again.
> (That is not that easy, if you're not used to it and not that deep into the whole virtio universe ;))


There have been many historical attempts in this area- you may want to take a
look first.

Thanks.

>
>
> Best regards,
> Steffen
>
> --
> Pengutronix e.K.                | Dipl.-Inform. Steffen Trumtrar |
> Steuerwalder Str. 21            | https://www.pengutronix.de/    |
> 31137 Hildesheim, Germany       | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0       |
> Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686| Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555    |