From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from m16.mail.163.com (m16.mail.163.com [117.135.210.3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FD386FC5 for ; Sat, 11 Apr 2026 00:33:41 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=117.135.210.3 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1775867628; cv=none; b=lswGuYK/ceLSm8tpTI+koNI35S2+EadrFTwh/3fs5K4CqqIRL8GDFHOOf45m8GYAN6y03fiDk8KiqW6ogtqJuurjRTd1tlQjtpXm7RVzhopOvpVyHpSZrlDeV54wZ31h2pjVs2V3bXJKZ3jTNkFBGppUL5d+QW5uTH8B2qJMF7w= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1775867628; c=relaxed/simple; bh=hZmYgx6N35U1PNa5aPxvldJ8w84iPx4xEepXwqPiJyc=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-Id: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=Bxn/hyLGwxi6QIyIMw97VC8b650cAljG2nh/z2e0PhbFom1sNyCQgNanOUUDBgRg9zfuQOxWQrOWmp9COa9kkHaCDgZ6g9UElw6jevYOPLnOiz2689fmtf9lVgiJTFa17NI/jKWg5chhfK9LasKiQJuDuu5n2uKShQWG9xOSiZE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=163.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=163.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=163.com header.i=@163.com header.b=ccFpTkYf; arc=none smtp.client-ip=117.135.210.3 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=163.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=163.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=163.com header.i=@163.com header.b="ccFpTkYf" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=163.com; s=s110527; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-Id:Content-Type: MIME-Version; bh=aCJgJEXOOYWHgY+vNytWHl/rzVHq7HwxBHOyVe82DmA=; b=ccFpTkYf+NNEQqqas0+ovyu7moloK5CuGGhRQHcI5Pe7SmjZSFJHxpUKv3CPcq GIhvygyWa8hE1qVKt2BWo3IDL29h7s5udpi6UcQ8/VNvm76fzJ4xYqQB8hW8Uf5N IQ35PSh/9HZUexhR1JNVIJ3jRPjOZqcD9Vuv7hSE6CIXw= Received: from 229.199.16.172.in-addr.arpa (unknown []) by gzga-smtp-mtada-g0-4 (Coremail) with SMTP id _____wBnU9vVltlpBLjTEQ--.50831S2; Sat, 11 Apr 2026 08:33:30 +0800 (CST) From: Cao Ruichuang To: Jakub Kicinski Cc: Stefano Garzarella , Bobby Eshleman , virtualization@lists.linux.dev, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] selftests: vsock: avoid races creating Unix socket paths In-Reply-To: <20260410134733.1c10a183@kernel.org> References: <177581562073.13887.468247298173578281@163.com> <20260410134733.1c10a183@kernel.org> Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2026 08:33:25 +0800 Message-Id: <177586760504.23328.14397180554353198920@163.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: virtualization@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CM-TRANSID:_____wBnU9vVltlpBLjTEQ--.50831S2 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1Uf129KBjDUn29KB7ZKAUJUUUUU529EdanIXcx71UUUUU7v73 VFW2AGmfu7bjvjm3AaLaJ3UbIYCTnIWIevJa73UjIFyTuYvjxUUPfHDUUUU X-CM-SenderInfo: pfuht3jhqyimi6rwjhhfrp/xtbC5xqs5WnZltqNFwAA3S Hi Jakub, Thanks for the correction. No, I do not have a concrete failure reproducer for this one. My change was based on the mktemp -u TOCTOU window in the selftest setup rather than on a demonstrated flaky failure. Given that, I agree this is not strong enough to keep reposting on the netdev side. I will stop here unless I can come back with a real repro. I will also follow the netdev posting rules you mentioned for future updates. Thanks, Cao Ruichuang